organgrinder
Well-known member
You have yet to say how you test the spirits as we are told in scripture. Lots of diversion but as yet no answer.It is the Church's role to teach, given by Jesus Himself just before He ascended to heaven.
You have yet to say how you test the spirits as we are told in scripture. Lots of diversion but as yet no answer.It is the Church's role to teach, given by Jesus Himself just before He ascended to heaven.
the rcc wasn't mentioned, nor did it exist in that time period. those He called to teach taught what He had taught them.It is the Church's role to teach, given by Jesus Himself just before He ascended to heaven.
Yes, to teach the truth of the true Gospel message of Jesus Cnrist--your church ceased to do that many centuries ago.It is the Church's role to teach, given by Jesus Himself just before He ascended to heaven.
That's what it does and will continue to do.Yes, to teach the truth of the true Gospel message of Jesus Cnrist--your church ceased to do that many centuries ago.
You have still failed to tell us how to test the spirits. You have been called out on this a couple of times. If you don't know just say so. I am pretty sure you don't.That's what it does and will continue to do.
Bonnie said:
Yes, to teach the truth of the true Gospel message of Jesus Cnrist--your church ceased to do that many centuries ago.
no it doesn't teach it. if it did then why don't catholics know it? go ahead and post it here for us.That's what it does and will continue to do.
No person in scripture was ever elevated above a servant.It was a women whom Satan tempted that led to the fall of mankind, so it was appropriate that it was through a women that God used to redeem mankind and destroy the works of Satan. God used the most humblest of creatures to defeat the most proud.
God has given us Mary as our mother, and he has placed Mary in a position to help us in our battle against the spiritual forces of darkness. Thank God for giving us Mary as our mother.
not against it either and the bible belongs to the Church. it is not just me and a bible, it is the church Christ founded and the book, which was written by that church, guided by the HS. Not everything is stated, word for word in the bible. The books that were to belong to the bible are not listed in the bible itself. It was the Church Christ founded, guided by the HS, that gave us the bible.Not found in Bible.
And that would include Mary.No person in scripture was ever elevated above a servant.
Matthew 11:11 NASB95 — “Truly I say to you, among those born of women there has not arisen anyone greater than John the Baptist! Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
I do not reject what Jesus said about the bread and wine, but I also remember He called the wine in the cup "this/the fruit of the vine", which Catholics ignore--meaning, the wine somehow is Jesus' blood in, with, and under the wine, yet it is also fully wine at the same time. Catholics ignore that, don't they? Our own senses tell us that. By extension, the body of Jesus is present in, with, and under the bread, but the bread is still bread, as well. A mystery, to be sure, but one I gladly accept.not against it either and the bible belongs to the Church. it is not just me and a bible, it is the church Christ founded and the book, which was written by that church, guided by the HS. Not everything is stated, word for word in the bible. The books that were to belong to the bible are not listed in the bible itself. It was the Church Christ founded, guided by the HS, that gave us the bible.
What is ironic, is that there are things that are explicitly taught in the bible, like Jesus saying eat my flesh, that protestants reject. It is like you want it both ways.
what meaning do you have about this/the fruit of the vine?I do not reject what Jesus said about the bread and wine, but I also remember He called the wine in the cup "this/the fruit of the vine", which Catholics ignore--meaning, the wine somehow is Jesus' blood in, with, and under the wine, yet it is also fully wine at the same time. Catholics ignore that, don't they? Our own senses tell us that. By extension, the body of Jesus is present in, with, and under the bread, but the bread is still bread, as well. A mystery, to be sure, but one I gladly accept.
So, why do Catholics ignore the "this/the fruit of the vine" that Jesus calls the contents of the cup, right after He says it is His blood?
There are other areas where Catholicism ignores what Jesus or one of His apostles clearly says...why is that, Blessings?
Yes, the Bible is against praying to Mary.not against it either
And what is the context?And that would include Mary.
intercessory pray is not against the bible.Yes, the Bible is against praying to Mary.
https://forums.carm.org/threads/only-pray-to-god.7370/
Was she a prophet?And what is the context?
That argument won't work.intercessory pray is not against the bible.
Funny, how many mothers in heaven do I have? God's inspired written word mentions only one, and not a single verse for Mary:
Gal 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
it is the answer.That argument won't work.
An incorrect one.it is the answer.
No, that is explicitly misinterpreted by your idolatrous "church".not against it either and the bible belongs to the Church. it is not just me and a bible, it is the church Christ founded and the book, which was written by that church, guided by the HS. Not everything is stated, word for word in the bible. The books that were to belong to the bible are not listed in the bible itself. It was the Church Christ founded, guided by the HS, that gave us the bible.
What is ironic, is that there are things that are explicitly taught in the bible, like Jesus saying eat my flesh, that protestants reject. It is like you want it both ways.
what is all of this? what question(s) were you asked that you can't answer, which caused you to 2 step in multiple directions?not against it either and the bible belongs to the Church. it is not just me and a bible, it is the church Christ founded and the book, which was written by that church, guided by the HS. Not everything is stated, word for word in the bible. The books that were to belong to the bible are not listed in the bible itself. It was the Church Christ founded, guided by the HS, that gave us the bible.
What is ironic, is that there are things that are explicitly taught in the bible, like Jesus saying eat my flesh, that protestants reject. It is like you want it both ways.