Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen) Martin Luther.Spoken like a true Lutheran...
Was Martie a troo Lutheran?
On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen) Martin Luther.Spoken like a true Lutheran...
Luther like all other Christians was simul justus et peccator, simultaneously just and sinner.On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen) Martin Luther.
Was Martie a troo Lutheran?
Are you implying he didn't always do what is right or best? That is not news. "If we say we have no sin then we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. But if we confess our sins then God is faithful and just to forgive us our sons." 1 John 1:8-9Markus 12:28-31
Luther Bibel 1545
28 Und es trat zu ihm der Schriftgelehrten einer, der ihnen zugehört hatte, wie sie sich miteinander befragten, und sah, daß er ihnen fein geantwortet hatte, und fragte ihn: Welches ist das vornehmste Gebot vor allen?
29 Jesus aber antwortete ihm: Das vornehmste Gebot vor allen Geboten ist das: "Höre Israel, der HERR, unser Gott, ist ein einiger Gott;
30 und du sollst Gott, deinen HERRN, lieben von ganzem Herzen, von ganzer Seele, von ganzem Gemüte und von allen deinen Kräften." Das ist das vornehmste Gebot.
31 Und das andere ist ihm gleich: "Du sollst deinen Nächsten lieben wie dich selbst." Es ist kein anderes Gebot größer denn diese.
Love thy neighbor as yourself is in the Luther translation.
Martie was no Moses.Luther like all other Christians was simul justus et peccator, simultaneously just and sinner.
You aren't going to complain about Moses, are you?
There are at least nine large volumes of his lectures on Moses that have been translated into English, eight on Moses 1 which he worked on from from 1535 until his death, and one on Moses 5, completed in 1525. You should read them sometime for a better understanding of Moses and the faith once delivered to the saints. As a side benefit you will also recognize the error of your claim.Martie was no Moses.
Moshe Rabbenu (Hebrew: מֹשֶׁה רַבֵּנוּ )
I am sure Martie had issues with Moses' Israelite heritage.
Thanks so much for introducing how Lutherans teach the development of false doctrine.Luther like all other Christians was simul justus et peccator, simultaneously just and sinner.
You aren't going to complain about Moses, are you?
What's your main point in continually disparaging (and frankly: you're mocking) Luther and the Lutherans, while at the same time mentioning above, "Love thy neighbor as yourself?" Do you strive to actually follow the paradigm of "Love thy neighbor as yourself," or do you have some sort of theology that exempts you from it?On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen) Martin Luther.
Was Martie a troo Lutheran?
What is your surety based on? I would be interested to see any documentation that Martin Luther "had issues" with Moses' "Israelite heritage."I am sure Martie had issues with Moses' Israelite heritage.
Hmm. This comparison is unjustified on a meaningful level:Mormons also do finger pointing to whitewash the sins of their founder.
That was part of it, it has a lot of layers. In terms of responsibility though, Luther was certainly responsible for his own words and actions, regardless of who wrote what. No one forced him to write what he did, he chose to write what he did.Plus, several times, James Swan has posted on here why Luther wrote that nasty little treatise--he was responding to a Jewish man who wrote that Mary was a whore and Jesus, her whoreson. Luther saw red about that and thus, responded in kind, unfortunately. He should NOT have reacted as he did. He should just have calmly refuted him, or ignored that letter/publication, or whatever it was.
This is a tactic I learned from Rome's defenders: who made you an authority to determine "the development of false doctrine"? Is there ordaining in the Authentic Nouveau Church? Have you been trained in a seminary?Thanks so much for introducing how Lutherans teach the development of false doctrine.
BJ are you Lutheran? Isn't just and sinner opposites of one another. That is like saying a sterile surgical knife is dirty.Luther like all other Christians was simul justus et peccator, simultaneously just and sinner.
I was referring to the five books of Moses, but since I wasn't more specific I am partly responsible for the comically illogical and false reply above.Thanks so much for introducing how Lutherans teach the development of false doctrine.
Moses. You people leave out his disobedience. he was chosen and disobeyed. If you are an advocate of disobedience, you will leave out how God commanded Moses to speak to the rock to bring hydration to the Israelites. He disobeyed and struck the rock. They got hydration, and
Moses was banished from entering the Promised Land. He got shut down. Learning opportunity for you.
Mormons also do finger pointing to whitewash the sins of their founder.
Yes, I am.BJ are you Lutheran?
No, it is not like your example. Unlike a knife which can't be sterile and dirty at the same time in the same way simul justus et peccator refers to what a person is reckoned by God in Christ through faith and what a person is reckoned by God in and of himself or herself. It is just as 1 John states.Isn't just and sinner opposites of one another. That is like saying a sterile surgical knife is dirty.
Yeah BJ, shouldn't the Bible make perfect sense on everything? (yes, that's a softball for you to knock wherever you want and let the team run around the bases for a while, enjoy).BJ are you Lutheran? Isn't just and sinner opposites of one another. That is like saying a sterile surgical knife is dirty.
Lol! Softball? By the time I got done defining terms, honing the claims and arguments, and addressing some of the common misunderstandings and objections it would seem more like the rock of Sisyphos. It is a good thing others have already addressed the topic directly or indirectly.Yeah BJ, shouldn't the Bible make perfect sense on everything? (yes, that's a softball for you to knock wherever you want and let the team run around the bases for a while, enjoy).
Lol! Its just amazing what one can learn on the internet.This is a tactic I learned from Rome's defenders: who made you an authority to determine "the development of false doctrine"? Is there ordaining in the Authentic Nouveau Church? Have you been trained in a seminary?
Why do you become the standard to determine "the development of false doctrine"? Do you answer to any authority other than your own? Do you ascribe to me in the woods under a tree by myself interpreting the Bible theology?
Yes, I am.
No, it is not like your example. Unlike a knife which can't be sterile and dirty at the same time in the same way simul justus et peccator refers to what a person is reckoned by God in Christ through faith and what a person is reckoned by God in and of himself or herself. It is just as 1 John states.