No Benefit to Taking Ivermectin for COVID-19 Symptoms

inertia

Super Member
In memory of long-winded politicised debates here at CARM

"A study led by the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) in partnership with Vanderbilt University found no differences in relief of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms between participants taking ivermectin and participants taking a placebo."*

- science comes through- again...

"Conclusions: Ivermectin dosed at 400 mcg/kg daily for 3 days resulted in less than one day of shortening of symptoms and did not lower incidence of hospitalization or death among outpatients with COVID-19 in the United States during the delta and omicron variant time periods."

Alex Jones and Joe Rogan still made their money.

____

*References:

- Duke Health ( June 13th 2022)
- MedRxiv
 
Last edited:

Nedsk

Well-known member
In memory of long-winded politicised debates here at CARM

"A study led by the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) in partnership with Vanderbilt University found no differences in relief of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms between participants taking ivermectin and participants taking a placebo."*

- science comes through- again...

"Conclusions: Ivermectin dosed at 400 mcg/kg daily for 3 days resulted in less than one day of shortening of symptoms and did not lower incidence of hospitalization or death among outpatients with COVID-19 in the United States during the delta and omicron variant time periods."

Alex Jones and Joe Rogan still made their money.

____

*References:

- Duke Health ( June 13th 2022)
- MedRxiv
Mild to moderate covid symptoms????? Lol

So did fauci and he made a hell of a lot more than either one of them.
 

Furion

Well-known member
Alex Jones and Joe Rogan still made their money.
And you still post your posts. You are like the voice in the wilderness warning everyone of the dangers of nothing. It's a big job man.

Aside from you and vibise, maybe one or two others, I don't see much credibility given here to your many studies. People decide for themselves and once you lie to them all bets are off. Fauci made your job much harder.

You've lost the fight over COVID fear, you've lost the fight over mandating your vaccines. Now it's fighting over whether some drug makes one feel better.
 

Harry Leggs

Super Member
In memory of long-winded politicised debates here at CARM

"A study led by the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) in partnership with Vanderbilt University found no differences in relief of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms between participants taking ivermectin and participants taking a placebo."*

- science comes through- again...

"Conclusions: Ivermectin dosed at 400 mcg/kg daily for 3 days resulted in less than one day of shortening of symptoms and did not lower incidence of hospitalization or death among outpatients with COVID-19 in the United States during the delta and omicron variant time periods."

Alex Jones and Joe Rogan still made their money.

____

*References:

- Duke Health ( June 13th 2022)
- MedRxiv
You mean no financial benefit for big pharma. There is all kinds of studies demonstrating the benefits of IVM, with others since the treatment is a cocktail, in correct dosage and early treatment. They have been posted here. Who funded the Duke study? Who benefits from the Duke study? How bout big pharma? From your Duke study. A i understand the IVM is not used in isolation but with others so you and your study are off on that.

''Ivermectin is not approved by the FDA to treat COVID-19 and should only be taken for COVID-19 as part of a clinical trial.''

That means Big Pharma wants no competition for their high-priced shots since it cuts into their profits. It is a rigged game bought and paid for by big pharma oligarchs. Always use tried and true medications over new, expensive and experimental shots that pass a low bar. Besides IVM is for treatment and the shots are EUA approved for prevention. If the shots prevented the spread then there would be no reason for IVM. :D All the shots do is make more billionaires for the already rich.
 
Last edited:

Nedsk

Well-known member
And you still post your posts. You are like the voice in the wilderness warning everyone of the dangers of nothing. It's a big job man.

Aside from you and vibise, maybe one or two others, I don't see much credibility given here to your many studies. People decide for themselves and once you lie to them all bets are off. Fauci made your job much harder.

You've lost the fight over COVID fear, you've lost the fight over mandating your vaccines. Now it's fighting over whether some drug makes one feel better.
Sad part is so many poor souls bought their lies.
 

vibise

Well-known member
And you still post your posts. You are like the voice in the wilderness warning everyone of the dangers of nothing. It's a big job man.

Aside from you and vibise, maybe one or two others, I don't see much credibility given here to your many studies. People decide for themselves and once you lie to them all bets are off. Fauci made your job much harder.

You've lost the fight over COVID fear, you've lost the fight over mandating your vaccines. Now it's fighting over whether some drug makes one feel better.
And how do these people decide for themselves? By listening to Jones and Rogan and other RW voices that disparage actual science, right?
People who "do their research" on RW websites instead of in medical libraries?
 

CrowCross

Super Member
In memory of long-winded politicised debates here at CARM

"A study led by the Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI) in partnership with Vanderbilt University found no differences in relief of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms between participants taking ivermectin and participants taking a placebo."*

- science comes through- again...

"Conclusions: Ivermectin dosed at 400 mcg/kg daily for 3 days resulted in less than one day of shortening of symptoms and did not lower incidence of hospitalization or death among outpatients with COVID-19 in the United States during the delta and omicron variant time periods."

Alex Jones and Joe Rogan still made their money.

____

*References:

- Duke Health ( June 13th 2022)
- MedRxiv
Should I post a few articles where studies show that Ivermectin does work?
 

inertia

Super Member
Mild to moderate covid symptoms????? Lol

So did fauci and he made a hell of a lot more than either one of them.

The OP is not about Dr. Fauci. It is about hard-nosed, properly conducted, decentralized, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled medical science.

___
 

inertia

Super Member
And you still post your posts. You are like the voice in the wilderness warning everyone of the dangers of nothing. It's a big job man.

Aside from you and vibise, maybe one or two others, I don't see much credibility given here to your many studies. People decide for themselves and once you lie to them all bets are off. Fauci made your job much harder.

You've lost the fight over COVID fear, you've lost the fight over mandating your vaccines. Now it's fighting over whether some drug makes one feel better.

Alex Jones for president perhaps?

___
 

Nedsk

Well-known member
The OP is not about Dr. Fauci. It is about hard-nosed, properly conducted, decentralized, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled medical science.

___
Oh I know it's not about fauci. So what????? The existence of this supposed "...hard-nosed, properly conducted, decentralized, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled medical science." doesnt prove fauci didn't take in tons of money from pushing this useless vaccine.
 

inertia

Super Member
You mean no financial benefit for big pharma. There is all kinds of studies demonstrating the benefits of IVM, with others since the treatment is a cocktail, in correct dosage and early treatment. They have been posted here. Who funded the Duke study? Who benefits from the Duke study? How bout big pharma? From your Duke study. A i understand the IVM is not used in isolation but with others so you and your study are off on that.

''Ivermectin is not approved by the FDA to treat COVID-19 and should only be taken for COVID-19 as part of a clinical trial.''

That means Big Pharma wants no competition for their high-priced shots since it cuts into their profits. It is a rigged game bought and paid for by big pharma oligarchs. Always use tried and true medications over new, expensive and experimental shots that pass a low bar. Besides IVM is for treatment and the shots are EUA approved for prevention. If the shots prevented the spread then there would be no reason for IVM. :D All the shots do is make more billionaires for the already rich.

Class war politics. Haves vs. Have Nots.

Has old fashioned Democratic politics leaked into the GOP?

___
 

inertia

Super Member
And how do these people decide for themselves? By listening to Jones and Rogan and other RW voices that disparage actual science, right?
People who "do their research" on RW websites instead of in medical libraries?

Excellent questions.

___
 

inertia

Super Member
Should I post a few articles where studies show that Ivermectin does work?

Did these studies include a decentralized, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled platform?

Sure - go ahead - make my day.

__
 
Last edited:

inertia

Super Member
Oh I know it's not about fauci. So what????? The existence of this supposed "...hard-nosed, properly conducted, decentralized, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled medical science." doesnt prove fauci didn't take in tons of money from pushing this useless vaccine.

When did class war politics become a GOP platform? It used to be, and still is, a basic tenet of the Democratic party.

___
 

Harry Leggs

Super Member
And how do these people decide for themselves? By listening to Jones and Rogan and other RW voices that disparage actual science, right?
You are a Fauci groupie. More important a stooge for a bunch of filthy rich corrupted fat cats in medicine who loves lies to truth.
People who "do their research" on RW websites instead of in medical libraries?
You would be lost in a medical library.
 
Top