No, our goal is not reducing auto accidents

BMS

Well-known member
Foetus, baby, toddler, teenager, adult, corpse. All stages on the human life story. All with different rights. The terms are not interchangeable. You can't call yourself an adult if you are a teenager, so that you can buy alcohol. You can't call yourself a corpse to avoid taxes. You can't call a foetus a baby to foster delusions of right to life. The reality everyone can see but you cannot acknowledge.
Except that the foetus doesn't have any rights, and especially after having been terminated. So no. not quite.
Since you say a man can call himself a transwomen and enter women's spaces, why cant a man call himself a transcorpse and avoid taxes? Why do you discriminate against people like that?
The rights given to humans are by those who have power to. They should be given in the best interest of that human and society as a whole. Pro-choice abortion fails that with the unborn.
 
Last edited:

Temujin

Well-known member
Except that the foetus doesn't have any rights, and especially after having been terminated. So no. not quite.
Exactly as I said. No rights is different from all the others. Glad you agree that the foetus has no rights.
Since you say a man can call himself a transwomen and enter women's spaces, why cant a man call himself a transcorpse and avoid taxes?
Because the first is reasonable, legal and acceptable to the vast majority of society, while the second is unreasonable, illegal and unacceptable to the vast majority of society. Society as a whole sets the rules.
Why do you discriminate against people like that?
You should look up the meaning of discriminate. I know you love definitions.
The rights given to humans are by those who have power to. They should be given in the best interest of that human and society as a whole. Pro-choice abortion fails that.
On the contrary. Pro-choice does exactly that. Which is why it is a fact that the more democratic a country is, the more liberal their abortion laws are likely to be, since that is what society as a whole deems is best.
 

Mik

Well-known member
Except that the foetus doesn't have any rights, and especially after having been terminated. So no. not quite.
Since you say a man can call himself a transwomen and enter women's spaces, why cant a man call himself a transcorpse and avoid taxes? Why do you discriminate against people like that?
The rights given to humans are by those who have power to. They should be given in the best interest of that human and society as a whole. Pro-choice abortion fails that with the unborn.
Baby murderers have to continually come up with new asinine ways to justify their belief in baby murdering. They know they reasoning is weak and asinine, but will continue defending baby murders with a smug smile on their faces. It's a fact that at conception a new human being/baby is present in the womb. They will blow off that scientific fact, so must come up with others ways justify the murder of their children in the womb. They take the saying 'womb to tomb' literally.

'These people try so hard to not say what is actually going on, the murder of life, a baby.'
 

BMS

Well-known member
Exactly as I said. No rights is different from all the others. Glad you agree that the foetus has no rights. Because the first is reasonable, legal and acceptable to the vast majority of society, while the second is unreasonable, illegal and unacceptable to the vast majority of society. Society as a whole sets the rules. You should look up the meaning of discriminate. I know you love definitions.
On the contrary. Pro-choice does exactly that. Which is why it is a fact that the more democratic a country is, the more liberal their abortion laws are likely to be, since that is what society as a whole deems is best.
So you named most of the developmental stages of the human life foetus to adult, and said all with different rights. You then said glad I agree the foetus has no rights. No I said I didnt agree. So your foetus that has different rights to the adult doesnt have any rights? Come on, make your mind up. Does the transfoetus have more or less rights than the cisfoetus
Go away and come back when you are coherent.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Baby murderers have to continually come up with new asinine ways to justify their belief in baby murdering. They know they reasoning is weak and asinine, but will continue defending baby murders with a smug smile on their faces. It's a fact that at conception a new human being/baby is present in the womb. They will blow off that scientific fact, so must come up with others ways justify the murder of their children in the womb. They take the saying 'womb to tomb' literally.

'These people try so hard to not say what is actually going on, the murder of life, a baby.'
They have lost touch with reality and they hate their lunacy being exposed. There are human lives being lost by pro-choice abortion just for their fantasy. Bless you for your stand against the evil injustice
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mik

Mik

Well-known member
They have lost touch with reality and they hate their lunacy being exposed. There are human lives being lost by pro-choice abortion just for their fantasy. Bless you for your stand against the evil injustice
Bless you for standing up for what is right. Sometimes with these baby murderers and their supporters we reach the point we need to follow/listen to God's Word. (Matt 7:6, Proverbs 29:9, 18:2, 1:7, 26:11, 15:2 and others).
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
Yep. Mental illness.
Close. It's a mental illness with a specific cause. It is psychological distress that results from an incongruence between one’s sex assigned at birth and one’s gender identity. Get that? It is the distress, not the incongruence, that is gender dysphoria.

Treat through counseling, not mutilation of their bodies.
Since you've provided precisely zero evidence that you have any psychiatric or psychological training, qualifications, expertise or experience, I'll defer to those people who do.
 

Mik

Well-known member
Close. It's a mental illness with a specific cause. It is psychological distress that results from an incongruence between one’s sex assigned at birth and one’s gender identity. Get that? It is the distress, not the incongruence, that is gender dysphoria.


Since you've provided precisely zero evidence that you have any psychiatric or psychological training, qualifications, expertise or experience, I'll defer to those people who do.
so you’ve refuted nothing I wrote. Get that?
 

BMS

Well-known member
Close. It's a mental illness with a specific cause. It is psychological distress that results from an incongruence between one’s sex assigned at birth and one’s gender identity. Get that? It is the distress, not the incongruence, that is gender dysphoria.


Since you've provided precisely zero evidence that you have any psychiatric or psychological training, qualifications, expertise or experience, I'll defer to those people who do.
Where there is s dis ease that someone has about their sex it is dysphoria. Where it is gender identity it is mental illness
 

BMS

Well-known member
Since you've provided precisely zero evidence that you have any psychiatric or psychological training, qualifications, expertise or experience, your opinion is worse than useless.

Got it?
Since you dismissed the expertise of hundreds of scientists clearly everyone in the world should come to you for everything they need to know. ;)
Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mik
Top