Carbon
Well-known member
Yes they do! Each and every time Christ calls them to life! I'm an example of it.Wrong; dead men respond all the time.
Yes they do! Each and every time Christ calls them to life! I'm an example of it.Wrong; dead men respond all the time.
Lol, Read my threads !Indeed!
What about after one is regenerated by God? Does God do the believing for him, or does man (then) freely choose willingly?
Its you. I would rather not discuss that with you. You are the exception. You cannot make me, you need to move on.except with homosexuals as the exception you do not discuss your interactions with others.
I'm just stating your own words that contradicted your earlier statement. Try to be more consistent without contradicting yourself. Say what you mean and mean what you say !Its you. I would rather not discuss that with you. You are the exception. You cannot make me, you need to move on.
There is no contradiction, you and I aren’t discussing it and your tantrum isn’t going to change that.I'm just stating your own words that contradicted your earlier statement. Try to be more consistent without contradicting yourself. Say what you mean and mean what you say !
You are the one being sarcastic and evasive not me. I was just pointing out your contradictions since you did not claim any exceptions to your statements such as homosexuals. That is on you, not me.There is no contradiction, you and I aren’t discussing it and your tantrum isn’t going to change that.
Failure: accusing others what you refuse to do yourself. You claim it but refuse to share it with us. Its such a secret witnessing technique that is so private between you and the homosexual.I wish you were that stern with homosexuals instead of compromising your witness to them because of what you think they might say.
You are the exception. The first time you asked me, I told you directly that I would not discuss it with you. In turn you generalized my statement in a way I never did, and falsely accused me of a contradiction.You are the one being sarcastic and evasive not me. I was just pointing out your contradictions since you did not claim any exceptions to your statements such as homosexuals. That is on you, not me.
I said exactly what I mean, and I mean exactly what I say. I don’t have to discuss that with you, I owe you no explanation why, and you need to move on.conclusion: mean what you say and say what you mean. Otherwise you will be called on it big fella who refuses to share his witnessing techniques when asked.
hope this helps !!!
You need to be accurate in what you claim and quit making absolute statements when there are " exceptions" to the rule and your get out of jail free card.You are the exception. The first time you asked me, I told you directly that I would not discuss it with you. In turn you generalized my statement in a way I never did, and falsely accused me of a contradiction.
I said exactly what I mean, and I mean exactly what I say. I don’t have to discuss that with you, I owe you no explanation why, and you need to move on.
There is nothing more accurate than what I told you the FIRST time:You need to be accurate in what you claim and quit making absolute statements when there are " exceptions" to the rule and your get out of jail free card.
next............................
Not really you just like to argue for arguments sake and you were caught with your hand in the cookie jar so man up and admit it big fella. If you can't stand the heat by all means get out of the kitchen.There is nothing more accurate than what I told you the FIRST time:
"No, I don’t feel particularly inclined to discuss that with you." link
Notice I never said that I dont discuss it in general, just that I wont discuss with you. The SECOND time you asked me, I told you that:
"I refuse to elaborate on those particular conversations" link
I am talking directly to you, and telling you, for a second time, that I wont talk about it. Not to be deterred, you generalized my statement, ignored my request to not talk about it with you, and asked about it a THIRD time, to which I had to again reiterate my stance:
"Its you. I would rather not discuss that with you. You are the exception. You cannot make me, you need to move on." link
And now here is the false claim of contradiction. You ignored my first response, generalized my second response, and falsely claimed my second response contradicted my third response. All of this could have been avoided if you had just accepted my refusal the first time.
I extend you the courtesy of telling you upfront that I wont talk about this with you, partially in hopes that you wont waste your time asking me things I already refused to share. It seems here that you are determined to waste your time, and thats ok with me. Asking me wont change my stance, but you are free to pointlessly make posts like this.Failure: accusing others what you refuse to do yourself. You claim it but refuse to share it with us. Its such a secret witnessing technique that is so private between you and the homosexual.
Are you a homophobe ?
Do you have any homosexual acquaintances ?
Any conversions ?
or just condemnation ?
Do you share the gospel with someone who is overweight and tell them they are sinning ?
What about someone underweight ? Do you expose them too ?
And what about someone that has a drink in public ? Do you witness to them that they could be a stumbling block to the weak ?
Do you point out everyone's particular sins when sharing the gospel ? If not why not ?
Or do you jut point out the sins of lesbians and homosexuals ?
Good luck with sharing the gospel............................
hope this helps !!!
I am man enough to admit any mistakes on my part, but you have to produce a legitimate one for me to do so. Just saying it doesnt make it so. I think you need to man up and accept the fact that you cannot make me talk about something I have already refused.Not really you just like to argue for arguments sake and you were caught with your hand in the cookie jar so man up and admit it big fella. If you can't stand the heat by all means get out of the kitchen.
hope this helps !!!
Are you using Leviticus for Jews or Gentiles in this case as it makes a difference . If so then you should kill anyone of the people God commanded under the OT law. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. You better stone everyone God commanded to stone. Otherwise you are misusing the Law in this case .I am man enough to admit any mistakes on my part, but you have to produce a legitimate one for me to do so. Just saying it doesnt make it so. I think you need to man up and accept the fact that you cannot make me talk about something I have already refused.
This all started with someone saying not to use Lev to witness to homosexuals. I take offense to that because I base how I witness of what Jesus to His disciples concerning future events:
Luke 21
13 And it shall turn to you for a testimony.
14 Settle it therefore in your hearts, not to meditate before what ye shall answer:
15 For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.
Jesus told them to not think about what they are going to say, that HE would give them a mouth and wisdom, to which their adversaries would not resist. To me, a person on an internet forum saying "dont use leviticus with homosexuals because they might point out how we dont follow the bible" flies in the face of our Lord. You are defending her line of thinking, and therefore we dont have anything to talk about.
Good bye.Are you using Leviticus for Jews or Gentiles in this case as it makes a difference . If so then you should kill anyone of the people God commanded under the OT law. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. You better stone everyone God commanded to stone. Otherwise you are misusing the Law in this case .
hope this helps !!!
You say goodbye and I say hello , hello hello I don’t know why you say goodbye I say helloGood bye.
He also misused Exodus 30:11-16 in which ransom and atonement have nothing to do with salvation eternally but with a census taken, and those of age are expected to contribute to the offering for the tabernacle. That and it also generally refers to taking a census to number those who can go to war.Are you using Leviticus for Jews or Gentiles in this case as it makes a difference . If so then you should kill anyone of the people God commanded under the OT law. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. You better stone everyone God commanded to stone. Otherwise you are misusing the Law in this case .
hope this helps !!!
I have a two part question about King David. Yes, I am going somewhere with this, but first I would like yours (and everyone elses) opinion on it.You say goodbye and I say hello , hello hello I don’t know why you say goodbye I say hello