This is exactly why I rarely post anymore...you literally ignored everything I said to you in the previous post. Not only that, even though what Tertullian said is not difficult to understand, you apparently don't (I say apparently as you ignored everything I said). I will copy and paste what Tertullian said again and this time highlight "the rule of faith" that was handed down to them...ready? Here we go:
"In the course of time, then, the Father forsooth was born, and the Father suffered, God Himself, the Lord Almighty, whom in their preaching they declare to be Jesus Christ. We, however, as we indeed always have done (and more especially since we have been better instructed by the Paraclete, who leads men indeed into all truth), believe that there is one only God, but under the following dispensation, or οἰκονομία, as it is called, that this one only God has also a Son, His Word, who proceeded from Himself, by whom all things were made, and without whom nothing was made. Him we believe to have been sent by the Father into the Virgin, and to have been born of her — being both Man and God, the Son of Man and the Son of God, and to have been called by the name of Jesus Christ; we believe Him to have suffered, died, and been buried, according to the Scriptures, and, after He had been raised again by the Father and taken back to heaven, to be sitting at the right hand of the Father, and that He will come to judge the quick and the dead; who sent also from heaven from the Father, according to His own promise, the Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, the sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father, and in the Son, and in the Holy Ghost. That this rule of faith has come down to us from the beginning of the gospel, even before any of the older heretics, much more before Praxeas, a pretender of yesterday, will be apparent both from the lateness of date which marks all heresies, and also from the absolutely novel character of our new-fangled Praxeas. In this principle also we must henceforth find a presumption of equal force against all heresies whatsoever — that whatever is first is true, whereas that is spurious which is later in date. But keeping this prescriptive rule inviolate, still some opportunity must be given for reviewing (the statements of heretics), with a view to the instruction and protection of various persons; were it only that it may not seem that each perversion of the truth is condemned without examination, and simply prejudged; especially in the case of this heresy, which supposes itself to possess the pure truth, in thinking that one cannot believe in One Only God in any other way than by saying that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are the very selfsame Person. As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons— the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. How they are susceptible of number without division, will be shown as our treatise proceeds." (Tertullian, Against Praxeas, ch 2)
What you see highlighted in red is the "Rule of Faith" that was handed down which is incredibly close to the Nicene Creed. In fact, this rule of faith can be found in other ANF writings and comes from what is known as "the Old Roman Creed." Once again, everything that is in Red is the rule of faith. The majority of believers was never Patripassians. What is more is that as best we know, Praxeas recanted of his false teaching.
Lastly, this Treatise is not against the church at large, it is titled and directed at "Praxeas" and his followers. The the "majority" of his followers are simple does not make all believers Patripassian, he is speaking to those who follow the teachings of Praxeas, those believers. Tertullian just finished clearly stating that this heresy is a new and novel heresy, not something that had been around forever which the majority of people believed. Now if you want to deny what is right in front of you I can't stop you and won't go back and forth on this for fifty posts.
TheLayman
