Open carry: how many guns is too many?

[inertia]

In situations like this, it can take only seconds before a heavily armed person begins shooting. Marley did not shoot anyone, but the outcome was different in a similar situation where the police elected not to act:

A Heavily Armed Man Caused Panic at a Supermarket. But Did He Break the Law?

In states with permissive gun laws, police and prosecutors have limited tools at their disposal when a heavily armed individual sows fear or panic in public.

www.nytimes.com

How should police handle these situations?
What limits should there be on carrying guns in public places?

I have been "Birched" by a John Birch Society member. He tried to convince me that everyone up to and including a teenage kid should have their own light anti-tank assault weapons.

In my opinion, the John Birch Society fell too deeply into the rabbit hole. - None other than William F. Buckley understood.

The John Birch Society wanted you to know:

"it was all a secret plot, and THEY were lying to you"

( Why does this sentiment seem eerily familiar? )

___

 

[Carol]

So you would do nothing at all if faced with someone in body armor carrying 2 or so weapons and lots of ammo?
Sounds foolish to me.
Or is this sort of thing common in your neighborhood?

I haven't noticed any of my neighbors wearing body armor.....

Most people planning on committing a crime don't usually announce it beforehand by drawing attention to themselves like that.

 

[Eightcrackers]

Actually, repeating crossbows are far more deadly than a Beretta M9. Many people survive when shot with a 9mm. If you get hit with an arrow with a razor broadhead or a poisoned arrow. You're going to die.

You really shouldn't have a conversation about weapons. You don't know much about them at all.

I know that mass-crossbowings are a lot rarer than mass shootings, and your having to resort to poisoned arrows shows how far you've gone down the rabbit-hole.

 

[Eightcrackers]

Democracy in action

Yep - have to be trained to drive a car, but not to own and carry a shooty-bang.

Murca!

 

[Carol]

Your risk of encountering a mass murderer are probably lower than being hit by lightning.

So do you panic when you hear thunder?

Untrained civilians using guns when faced with a criminal can be dangerous. Like the case of the man who tried to shoot a fleeing robber, missed him, but killed a little girl sitting in a car with her father.

 

[Reformedguy]

Yep - have to be trained to drive a car, but not to own and carry a shooty-bang.

Murca!

Driving a car is a little more complicated than shooting a gun.

 

[Reformedguy]

And mass shootings are virtually nonexistent in countries where gun ownership is restricted.

And drunk driving would be nonexistent in a country with no cars.

 

[christ_undivided]

I know that mass-crossbowings are a lot rarer than mass shootings, and your having to resort to poisoned arrows shows how far you've gone down the rabbit-hole.

No. I corrected your mistake. There have been plenty of "mass killings" relative to crossbows in human history.

Get serious, you don't want anyone to be able to defend themselves against what you desire for society. You seek power. That is what drive the antigun agenda. They seek power over everyone.

 

[christ_undivided]

A movie character is relevant...how?

Just saying that a killer will find a way to kill. You're ignoring this fact.

Why not institute "Martial law" and search everyone traveling everywhere?

 

[Eightcrackers]

Get serious, you don't want anyone to be able to defend themselves against what you desire for society.

The typical anti-Second Amendment strawman.

That the idea of wanting to walk the streets without the threat of being shot by some random yahoo, does not occur to you, is sad.

 

[Eightcrackers]

Just saying that a killer will find a way to kill. You're ignoring this fact.

Then why not let everybody buy Gatling guns, or plastic explosives?

 

[christ_undivided]

So you would do nothing at all if faced with someone in body armor carrying 2 or so weapons and lots of ammo?
Sounds foolish to me.
Or is this sort of thing common in your neighborhood?

I would avoid them and get ready for a head shot with my CC weapon......

 

[christ_undivided]

The typical anti-Second Amendment strawman.

That the idea of wanting to walk the streets without the threat of being shot by some random yahoo, does not occur to you, is sad.

What about a random "yahoo" with other weapons..... like a car? Or taking control of a bus or train or ??????

You left out what I said about "power"..... That what you seek. You want to control society and FORCE your ideals on everyone. That is what you want to your "antigun" position.

 

[christ_undivided]

Then why not let everybody buy Gatling guns, or plastic explosives?

Criminals have them already.

 

[Eightcrackers]

What about a random "yahoo" with other weapons..... like a car?

The primary purpose of a car, is not as a weapon.

Or taking control of a bus or train or ??????

See above.

You left out what I said about "power"..... That what you seek.

Nothing will disabuse you of this misapprehension, so I won't bother.

You want to control society and FORCE your ideals on everyone.

See above.

You cannot understand my position because you come from somewhere that's always allowed guns.

 

[Eightcrackers]

Criminals have them already.

Not what I asked - why not let everybody have them, if "killers will find a way"?

 

[glenlogie]

Yep - have to be trained to drive a car, but not to own and carry a shooty-bang.

Murca!

So stay where you are

 

[christ_undivided]

The primary purpose of a car, is not as a weapon.

That makes ZERO difference. It is like saying you can't use water in any other manner than for drinking. Or you can only use Viagra for heart issues.

You cannot understand my position because you come from somewhere that's always allowed guns.

Your government and criminals have guns. Why don't you lay aside your military's weapons?

 

[christ_undivided]

Not what I asked - why not let everybody have them, if "killers will find a way"?

I answered you. You don't like the answer. Your country has plenty of criminals. Don't pretend you don't. When they attack society all you can do is cry.....

 

[Eightcrackers]

Your government and criminals have guns.

The goverment are supposed to have them, and far fewer of our criminals have them because we don't have an idiotic provision that they can be owned by all and sundry.