Part of why the libertarians cannot move forward.

Most social media sites are not government owned so they may set their own rules. Trump cultists want the government to control the rules.

At truth social they have their own set of rules. The government should not interfere.
Not so. The "Trump cultists" as you call them want a level playing field, that all media sites adhere to our national ideal of the free and open exchange of ideas. The government is already involved in this with Act 420, which gives these sites an exemption to do what they do. They are supposed to act like open platforms, but now they are acting like publishers with their censorship of content. Act 420 needs to be revoked, no more exemptions for the authoritarian censors!
 
Most social media sites are not government owned so they may set their own rules. Trump cultists want the government to control the rules.

At truth social they have their own set of rules. The government should not interfere.
Are you in favor or removal the exception that they bsve?
 
So do we have the freedom to call our the social media sights for saying they are a place for people to exchange ideas, and then ban people they don't like?
You have the freedom to complain all you like. Do what Trump did start his own social media site with their very own set of rules
 
Show us the place in the Constitution where healthcare is a right.
Just because she says it is some sort of "human right" and that makes it so, I guess, and that it must be unilaterally and immediately be accepted by the governing authority of the United States and the citizenry. Ridiculous!

But as you know, that is not how our nation is governed. We don't make things up and then say the government now has to provide it. Even when the Constitution says we have the "right to bear arms", I certainly don't expect it to provide me with a firearm.
 
You have the freedom to complain all you like. Do what Trump did start his own social media site with their very own set of rules
Please address the current government involvement in the social media world with Act 420 and the exemption it gives these sites.
 
Show us the place in the Constitution where healthcare is a right.
It is not in the constitution however that does not make healthcare not a basic human right. All children when hurt are cared for and receive medical attention from their mothers. Other humans lend a hand to help others.

Jesus healed the sick and did not ask for payment.
 
Not so. The "Trump cultists" as you call them want a level playing field, that all media sites adhere to our national ideal of the free and open exchange of ideas. The government is already involved in this with Act 420, which gives these sites an exemption to do what they do. They are supposed to act like open platforms, but now they are acting like publishers with their censorship of content. Act 420 needs to be revoked, no more exemptions for the authoritarian censors!
Sorry you can't call for violence.
 
I think you mean this.


Yeah it's called freedom
Okay, it's 230. It used to be freedom at the inception of the internet where these sites said they would be open platforms. Now, they are acting like publishers instead of open platforms with their censorship. These media sites have also morphed into becoming the nations town hall, things have changed and now the law needs to be changed, or they need to go back to being the "open platforms " that they said they would be.
 
It is not in the constitution however that does not make healthcare not a basic human right. All children when hurt are cared for and receive medical attention from their mothers. Other humans lend a hand to help others.

Jesus healed the sick and did not ask for payment.
Healing someone with a wave of the hand is completely different than providing healthcare for a lifetime that would cost millions of someone else's dollars.
 
Back
Top