If belief is necessary in order to ,make the truth known to you and you cannot both believe and unbelieve at the same time in order to make the truth and reality known to you, then how can you know unbelief exists in reality when belief is what it necessary in rodre to make the truth and reality known to you to begin with?
Once again you confuse unbelief and the object of that unbelief.
Unbelief exists; everybody lacks belief in somethings. You lack belief in any number of things; your unbelief exists. The objects of your unbelief may not.
Unbelief exists in reality; objects of unbelief may not exist in reality.
All Christians believe in their belief's capacity to make the truth and reality known to them, because in reality belief is necessary in order to make the truth and reality known to everyone including atheists silly.
No, they do not. Nobody but you beliefs in their belief's capacity to make anything known to them. Belief is necessary (as everybody agrees); it is not sufficient (as everybody but you agree).
The lack of something that occurs in reality, in this case belief, doesn't have the capacity to make the truth and reality known to anyone, because in reality it is belief that is necessary in order to make the truth known and not unbelief at all silly.
So what? You have an unbelief in leprechauns. So what? You have other beliefs that allow you to know the truth and reality. Just like atheists.
Actually in realty it is "going to come down" to how and why the truth and reality is known to us, because it is ONLY in and with belief and a believing mind that the truth and reality is known to us. And NOT with unbelief or a unbelieving mind silly.
Your mind is just as unbelieving as mine. I don't know whether this is the usual problem with your English language comprehension or what. A mind that has an unbelief (like yours and mine) is an unbelieving mind. So according to your 'logic', neither of us can know anything about truth or reality, which is obvious nonsense.
Lack of belief has NO ontological or epistemological status in reality, because if belief is necessary and NOT unbelief to make the truth and reality known to us to begin with, then in reality YOUR unbelief doesn't have the capacity to make the truth known to anyone including you . You are wallowing around in your own delusional nonsense silly.
Nobody suggested that unbelief has the capacity to make anything known. That is your strawman.
You dont' know what either 'strawman' or 'projection' mean, as you demonstrate every time you use them.
In reality there is no belief required nor any necessary in order for something to not exist in reality silly.
That's a strawman, since I never said anything to the contrary.
And unbelief nor lack of belief cannot be a belief and a unbelief at the same time.
Another strawman since I never said anything to the contrary.
Also, for the same reason why in reality you cannot believe and disbelieve in the same thing at the same time, as that is in violation of the Law of Non-Contradiction.
Yet another strawman since I never said anything to the contrary.
None of this even addresses the fact that you, just like me, have a number of unbeliefs. Those unbeliefs exist in reality; the objects of them may not.