Philip makes a request to Jesus: "Show us the Father."

[Yahchristian]

Blessings, oh slow one.

I answer that A thru D carries with it the same in meaning as is with E. Why your modern humanism cannot comprehend this, I will never know.

So all these are “the same in meaning”...

A) Jesus' divine nature
B) the divine Being
C) the first Person of the Trinity
D) the attributes of the first Person of the Trinity
E) eternal GOD

I thought Trinitarians made a big distinction between Person, Being, attributes, etc.

 

[aeg4971]

So all these are “the same in meaning”...

A) Jesus' divine nature
B) the divine Being
C) the first Person of the Trinity
D) the attributes of the first Person of the Trinity
E) eternal GOD

I thought Trinitarians made a big distinction between Person, Being, attributes, etc.

Ok I am going to try and talk to you like a 5th grader . There is nothing in God that is not simply God ,since ALL in Him is His ESSENCE for He by Himself prepossesses the perfection of All being, It follows what is predicated of Him, we still must speak of each word and term according to their own proper concept idea and perfection ,like person being attributes etc.

As I stated before and by every word written in scriptures, clearly we All Christians, even the heretics; we speak of God in His simplicity and we speak of God in His subsistence.

.......Alan

 

[Yahchristian]

Ok I am going to try and talk to you like a 5th grader . There is nothing in God that is not simply God ,since ALL in Him is His ESSENCE for He by Himself prepossesses the perfection of All being, It follows what is predicated of Him, we still must speak of each word and term according to their own proper concept idea and perfection ,like person being attributes etc.

As I stated before and by every word written in scriptures, clearly we All Christians, even the heretics; we speak of God in His simplicity and we speak of God in His subsistence.

.......Alan

I specifically mentioned these terms...

A) Jesus' divine nature
B) the divine Being
C) the first Person of the Trinity
D) the attributes of the first Person of the Trinity
E) eternal GOD

And you say they are all "the same in meaning".

I was just giving you a chance to change your mind.

If you don't want to, just say so.

 

[aeg4971]

I specifically mentioned these terms...

A) Jesus' divine nature
B) the divine Being
C) the first Person of the Trinity
D) the attributes of the first Person of the Trinity
E) eternal GOD

And you say they are all "the same in meaning".

I was just giving you a chance to change your mind.

If you don't want to, just say so.

I don't need to change my mind because I don't nearly speak so much in the corporal and created conditions that so easily beset you as with many . God is nowise a composition of quantitative parts . Hence I gave you proper context in which words and terms are spoken according to their own proper concept and idea , nevertheless they carry with it divine substance itself. Hence undivided Supremely being itself; the same meaning. As in God.

You keep looking for polytheism and you are not going to get it from me because there isn't any to give. God is absolutely one thing, God . It follows as God is the same as Godhead:

A is God
B is God
C is God
D is God
E is God


........Alan

 

[Yahchristian]

Ok I am going to try and talk to you like a 5th grader .

"Jesus' divine nature" and "the first Person of the Trinity" cannot be "the SAME in meaning" unless these two statements are either BOTH true or BOTH false...

A) Jesus' divine nature assumed a human nature.
B) The first Person of the Trinity assumed a human nature.

So, which (if any) of those statements do you say are true?

 

[Woody50]

You're missing the point entirely.

So prove it. Show me.

Knock this off, dude. Answer or don't.

Your turn....

 

[aeg4971]

"Jesus' divine nature" and "the first Person of the Trinity" cannot be "the SAME in meaning" unless these two statements are either BOTH true or BOTH false...

A) Jesus' divine nature assumed a human nature.
B) The first Person of the Trinity assumed a human nature.

So, which (if any) of those statements do you say are true?

The Word Himself was made flesh , hence the second person of the Trinity assumed by union.

Hope that helps...... Alan

 

[johnny guitar]

"Jesus' divine nature" and "the first Person of the Trinity" cannot be "the SAME in meaning" unless these two statements are either BOTH true or BOTH false...

A) Jesus' divine nature assumed a human nature.
B) The first Person of the Trinity assumed a human nature.

So, which (if any) of those statements do you say are true?

Both are false.