It is one big fat lie by your institution. There is no such thing and the apostles would have nothing at all to do with your leaders. You are besmirching their names by saying they do. Your leaders do not follow their writings, they do not act like the apostles. There is nothing apostolic about them.
Pope backs civil unions
- Thread starter organgrinder
- Start date
The RCC lies and it lies about its history, it lies about what it does, it lies to the legal authorities. and it teaches false doctrines.
Yep not RCC at all in the 1st Century. Your vile institution had not raised its ugly head. It does not follow the NT churches, it does not test the spirits and it lies.
Yep you brought up legends post 1571.
You posted:
Legend says he was the child jesus took up in his arms (mk9: 35).
My response was another legend, what you said about Romulus and Remus can be said about your legend about Ignatius. If you don't want the stupidity of what is posted to be revealed, don't post the rubbish.
No I quoted scripture, you are rejecting what scripture says about testing the spirits. It is you who are your own authority, ignoring the scriptures you don't like.
You can never get my avatar right. But this shows the problems with how the RCs read scripture etc.
I have never said I am the final authority. I quoted the scripture which stated exactly what I said. But you are you own authority, you have decided to reject the scripture about testing the spirits, you have decided this imo because you know your institution fails those tests. You ignore scriptures because the scriptures show the truth about your institution and its lies.
Thank you. I am absolutely amazed at how they ignore the scriptures and blame us for revealing the truth. Not by what we say or think, we reveal it by quoting scripture.
Yep an RC started it.
By the way Mark 9:35 states:
35 Sitting down, Jesus called the Twelve and said, “Anyone who wants to be first must be the very last, and the servant of all.”
they don't want to hear the truth.
mica said:
the stuff the rcc was built on, not the Rock of Christ and not found in scripture.
the rcc and its history does.
the stuff the rcc was built on, not the Rock of Christ and not found in scripture.
the bible does not.
the rcc and its history does.
then you should be able to find your catholic teachings in Paul's writing to it. look for them.
yes, test the spirits but who is the authority to decide... you?
it is historical truth. since you cannot accept it, all you can do is evade and deny.
catholics don't accept biblical truth.
Well do you think God would lead us astray, we have His word to guide us. It is obvious your institution has ignored those tests because it fails them. It fails because it ignores the writings of Paul and Peter, and Paul makes up most of the NT.
N
We do not have to follow false leaders, we do not have to follow liars that means we do not have to follow your institution.
No I didn't evade and deny. I do not deny your the fact that Peter would have nothing to do with an institution that wallows in all forms of sexual sin. He said that words of Paul are scripture, Paul is clear if so called brothers and sisters do sexual sin expel them. But your misogynist institution excommunicates women who have abortions but does nothing about leaders who abuse children, rape nuns and fornicate. That is being hypocritical, which puts your leaders in the same boat as the Pharisees.
We do not have to follow false leaders, we do not have to follow liars that means we do not have to follow your institution.
I didn't say he was a legend please do not misinterpret my post. Your reading comprehension shows why RCs have trouble with scripture. I was commenting on the legend about Ignatius that an RC brought up without any evidence. I never said Ignatius was a legend. He didn't reach those heights.
so, being the bishop of the catholic church in antioch is historical truth. thanks.I didn't say he was a legend please do not misinterpret my post. Your reading comprehension shows why RCs have trouble with scripture. I was commenting on the legend about Ignatius that an RC brought up without any evidence. I never said Ignatius was a legend. He didn't reach those heights.