Temujin
Well-known member
I didn't say when it happened. 😏"Reduced"?
I didn't say when it happened. 😏"Reduced"?
I know you're proud because killing is what you people do. I'm not surprised when a craftsman is proud of his work so why would it be different for morally bankrupt baby killers?It seems that you are reduced to mindless abuse. If it helps, I can tell you that I don't mind being associated with the right to abortion. In fact I am very proud of it. I know first hand the effect it has.
I have no idea, never having come across one.I know you're proud because killing is what you people do. I'm not surprised when a craftsman is proud of his work so why would it be different for morally bankrupt baby killers?
Yeah and no Nazi ever killed a Jew right? It's the joy of having no morals that motivates you people.I have no idea, never having come across one.
It's the worry of having no morals that makes you rely on others to tell you what to think.Yeah and no Nazi ever killed a Jew right? It's the joy of having no morals that motivates you people.
No need to have others tell me. It's quite clear, physically and mentally healthy people desire life and govt or "society" didnt give me life so it doesn't belong to them to decide if or when I have it. It's there job to protect it. Only a dimwit thinks the govt or society can dictate such things.It's the worry of having no morals that makes you rely on others to tell you what to think.
Prisons are full of dimwits who think that they can't.No need to have others tell me. It's quite clear, physically and mentally healthy people desire life and govt or "society" didnt give me life so it doesn't belong to them to decide if or when I have it. It's there job to protect it. Only a dimwit thinks the govt or society can dictate such things.
Society also approved slavery. The fact you can't see the problem says it all. People with power can do lots of things. Whether or not it's right is another matter. According to you anything they decide is just fine.Prisons are full of dimwits who think that they can't.
I get it. Here"Reduced"?
Only people can decide what is right. When enough people think that slavery is wrong, slavery gets abolished. When enough people think that women should have votes, women get the vote. When enough people decide that gay people should have the right to marry the person they love, single sex marriage is permitted. People have the power to decide what is right and what is wrong. You are the blind one. You think that the antediluvian moral stance of your church is the only possible morality there is. Well you are wrong.Society also approved slavery. The fact you can't see the problem says it all. People with power can do lots of things. Whether or not it's right is another matter. According to you anything they decide is just fine.
So you think when enough people thought slavery was right, that it was a moral thing to do to keep slaves? Just Yes or No answers the question.Only people can decide what is right. When enough people think that slavery is wrong, slavery gets abolished. When enough people think that women should have votes, women get the vote. When enough people decide that gay people should have the right to marry the person they love, single sex marriage is permitted. People have the power to decide what is right and what is wrong. You are the blind one. You think that the antediluvian moral stance of your church is the only possible morality there is. Well you are wrong.
Then of course with that position, when enough people think slavery is ok then slavery is legal. But do you support slavery when it is legal and moral? If not then there is the major flaw in your argument.Only people can decide what is right. When enough people think that slavery is wrong, slavery gets abolished. When enough people think that women should have votes, women get the vote. When enough people decide that gay people should have the right to marry the person they love, single sex marriage is permitted. People have the power to decide what is right and what is wrong. You are the blind one. You think that the antediluvian moral stance of your church is the only possible morality there is. Well you are wrong.
Remember that poster is a Brit of some type or description so we're dealing with some strange views there.Then of course with that position, when enough people think slavery is ok then slavery is legal. But do you support slavery when it is legal and moral? If not then there is the major flaw in your argument.
By the way, do gay people love their parents and if so shpuld they be allowed to marry them? ... might want to think about that generalisation
It sure is a baby.Look, its ends up with a dead human being. You call it a fetus and we call it a baby.
Btw when you say rights of women, what do you mean by women?
Pro-choice is the same as pro-abortion in the abortion trades.I am not in favour of drinking - I never touch the stuff, and I wish others wouldn't, either - but I am in favour of the right to drink.
Pro-choice, but not pro-drinking.
Same with abortion, despite your belief to the contrary.
You are simply wrong, and that's an end of it.
What does "in the abortion trades" mean?Pro-choice is the same as pro-abortion in the abortion trades.
Only people can decide what is right. When enough people think that slavery is wrong, slavery gets abolished.
Then your people paid off the slave owners and not the slaves at the end of your slavery decades.When enough people think that women should have votes, women get the vote. When enough people decide that gay people should have the right to marry the person they love, single sex marriage is permitted. People have the power to decide what is right and what is wrong. You are the blind one. You think that the antediluvian moral stance of your church is the only possible morality there is. Well you are wrong.
What is a woman? Watching pro-deathers cast deflection questions.What does "in the abortion trades" mean?
An adult human with XX chromosomes.What is a woman? Watching pro-deathers cast deflection questions.