Sadly not, which is why the comparison with extremist ideologies like the Nazi's and the Marxists.
So they do, but did Christ fulfil the agendas of the NT community? No. It wasnt what the wanted or expected and they were challenged. This is where your remark was faulty, and where mine was correct as you have just shown.
There is the written testimony, so there is some evidence, but what we are challenging you on is the observable reality of the unborn human being.
Why are you still lying about my position? Why can't you acknowledge that I believe biology is irrelevant to abortion? (It is also largely irrelevant to trans gender issues, but that is a different subject). Biology doesn't determine morals and abortion is a moral question. Once again you go off on a tangent, basing your reply on a false statement about me. You are establishing a pattern.
Yes of course, but then once again you didn't address my point which was the subjective limits of 14 and 24 weeks and the subjective criteria they are based on namely either sentience or survivability, which is subjective. They aren't even the subjectivity of the pro-choice claim that a woman should be allowed to choose whether to 'terminate her pregnancy'. If the woman should be allowed to 'terminate her pregnancy' then why do you support a limit of 24 weeks?
In what way? You arent responding to the points put to you.
I do acknowledge that, and my position is that is a denial of reality. That is one of the reasons the law needs changing by educating people of the reality.
Since you cant see the relevance of biology in abortion it is hardly surprising you cant see its relevance so called 'trans gender' issues.
Very happy to address your point, since it supports my position that in reality the objective laws of different states are informed and formulated by the subjective views of those drafting them, not by some ineffable dictate from an invisible and silent god.
Because this right, like virtually every right, is qualified by circumstances. The risks of terminating a pregnancy should be outweighed by the risks of not terminating it.
While I give you credit for referencing the best animation humanity ever conceived of, that same humanity has no umpire for world events - or even crimes at the level of the individual.
Not at all. The unborn child has no rights, cannot be a victim of crime and is not considered at all. What you want is the right to impose your morality on the bodily integrity of women who you have no other connection with.
All your argument is proving is that you don't understand what murder is, you don't understand what a baby is, you don't understand the motivations or rationale of those who support abortion rights and you don't know what is relevant and what is irrelevant. You have homework to do before your arguments can ve treated seriously.
Ahhh, another thing you don't understand. Leaving aside that this doesn't apply to me at all, since I do not agree with abortion up to term, if you think that the only thing that happens at birth is that the baby moves 3 inches, then you are sadly uninformed. There are massive physiological changes, particularly to the respiratory and circulatory systems. The biological difference between a foetus ten minutes before birth and a baby ten minutes after are profound.
So what? The Nazis did X.
I refer you to my previous comments on emotionally gut-renching falsehoods being a poor substitute for actual reason.
No. Never experienced it. I have experienced the joy, thankfulness and relief from stress experienced by the women I have assisted who chose to have an abortion. I don't know about lasting an entire life, but I still get Christmas cards 15 years later.
Nope, not the objectiveness of the existence of the different laws in different countries, but the subjective criteria, unless of course you are saying the limit has to be 24 weeks in the UK and has to be 14 weeks in Europe for some objective reason. I have acknowledged that the laws of different states are objective in themselves but you are unwilling or unable to acknowledge the subjective nature of the decisions those laws are based on.
Sorry, I'm not really interested in discussing all these slogans that have been rehashed a thousand times.
It's a very good song, whether it's about the Nazis or not.
Yup, murder is murder. And abortion is abortion, not murder.
Abortion is not murder. Nobody is "pro-abortion". Most people are pro-choice.
So subjective then according to the different criteria. There is greater risk to the unborn human in terminating a pregnancy just by choice of the mother. Be careful because if you cant accept the unborn human being's life, the mother can lump it. But education will bring love and justice into the situation whereby the care of both the mother and her unborn child are taken into consideration; that cant happen with the rhetoric and ideology coming from pro-choice and yourself
Abortion is murder. Legalised murder in many countries.