Question for Christians on Morality

stiggy wiggy

Well-known member
I never said I was.

Let ME try out that kind of stuff:

Are you vaping a jewjitzu? Oh my aching sides.

True, which proves he's human.

Correct. He became human. It's called the Incarnation.

Humans bleed.

Correct.

Jesus told Peter that God is neither flesh nor blood, Mat 16:17.

Nope, doesn't say that.

The prophet Isaiah in 40:18,25:46:5, shows the same with the Hebrew choice of damah for likeness, used for physicality, blood, man, but you wouldn't know that.

Isaiah lived before God became incarnate. But you wouldn't know that.

The idea of a physical god is ridiculed by Elijah in 1 Kings 18:27 CEV.

At noon, Elijah began making fun of them. “Pray louder!” he said. “Baal must be a god. Maybe he's daydreaming or using the toilet or traveling somewhere. Or maybe he's asleep, and you have to wake him up.”

Elijah lived before God became incarnate. But you wouldn't know that.

While you're down on a lower level, you can shine my shoes.

Should I scrape off the feces you've been stepping in with this thread while I'm down here, sweet Virginia?
 

Jewjitzu

Well-known member
Let ME try out that kind of stuff:

Are you vaping a jewjitzu? Oh my aching sides.
Boy, you don't follow along very well. And it shows.

Correct. He became human. It's called the Incarnation.
Zero proof for incarnation. Born of natural means.

And Jesus is human.

Nope, doesn't say that.
It says flesh and blood didn't show the understanding to Peter but the Father in heaven. Can't you follow syllogisms?

Isaiah lived before God became incarnate. But you wouldn't know that.
It says God has no likeness to humans. And elsewhere that He isn't a man. No where is an incarnation predicted. You failed again.

Elijah lived before God became incarnate. But you wouldn't know that.
So the gods of myth are human and eliminate and your ok with that concept for your deity?

You don't think Elijah would laugh in the future as well with a false god?

Should I scrape off the feces you've been stepping in with this thread while I'm down here, sweet Virginia?
Sure. Scrape off your Christian morality. You're supposed to be preaching the gospel? Boy you're an utter failure. Use the beam in the eye for the fireplace.

Rotfl... put a fork in it. You're done.
 
Last edited:

stiggy wiggy

Well-known member
Zero proof for incarnation.

Zero proof I said I have proof.

And Jesus is human.

Correct.

It says flesh and blood didn't show the understanding to Peter but the Father in heaven.

Correct. Our heavenly Father is not flesh and blood.

It says God has no likeness to humans.

Correct. He was unique among humans.

And elsewhere that He isn't a man.

Incorrect.

No where is an incarnation predicted.

No where (sic) did I say it was, though it was.

So the gods of myth are human and eliminate and your ok with that concept for your deity?

That sentence make no sense. Try again.
 

Jewjitzu

Well-known member
Zero proof I said I have proof.
Then zero incarnation. Great you agree with me.

Born like ordinary men, bled and died like one too. Oh well.

Correct. Our heavenly Father is not flesh and blood.
Then God can't incarnate. It's pretty simple. Just like Isaiah said. No human likeness, flesh, blood.

Correct. He was unique among humans.
Not really. He has normal human bodily functions.

Incorrect.
Rotfl... you should know better than that. Num 23:19, 1 Samuel 15:29, Hosea 11:9.

No where (sic) did I say it was, though it was.
Rotfl... Zero scriptural support.

That sentence make no sense. Try again.
Makes plenty of sense. You're okay with a bathroom stall god. Pass him the tissue. What a throne! Rotfl...

Are you done with your scraping?
 
Last edited:

stiggy wiggy

Well-known member
Then zero incarnation.

Candy bars cannot be incarnated.

Born like ordinary men, bled and died like one too.

Correct. See Hebrews 4:15.

Then God can't incarnate.

And yet He did.

He has normal human bodily functions.

Correct. He had to take dumps.


Another nitrous oxide induced seizure? Dude, get some help.

Num 23:19, 1 Samuel 15:29, Hosea 11:9.

AMEN! Love those. What do you like about them?

Rotfl... Zero scriptural support.

Isaiah 53, Gen 3:15, Isaiah 7:14, Micah 5:2

Buddy, you've now got enough egg on your face to serve an entire squad of marines at a Waffle House.

Are you done with your scraping?

That was my joke, sweet Virginia. Get your own material..
 

Jewjitzu

Well-known member
Candy bars cannot be incarnated.
Never said they could. But they're already physical.

Correct. See Hebrews 4:15.
High Priests are from the line of Aaron. Jesus wasn't one.

And yet He did.
You gave zero proof.

Correct. He had to take dumps.
Right. God doesn't. No corruption, etc.

Another nitrous oxide induced seizure? Dude, get some help.
Why spread falsehoods? Where are your Christian morals?

AMEN! Love those. What do you like about them?
That God isn't man in any way, shape, or form.

Isaiah 53,
Yep, no mention of God as the servant.

Gen 3:15,
Yep, Eve was the context.

Isaiah 7:14,
Yep, the context is in the time of King Ahaz and Isaiah, v15-16. Jesus never fulfilled any of it. And almah means maiden.

Micah 5:2
Yep, messiah will descend from David and Jesse who were both from Bethlehem.

Buddy, you've now got enough egg on your face to serve an entire squad of marines at a Waffle House.
Check your scraping hands, especially under the finger nails 💅.

Waffle house. Boy you're fancy.

That was my joke, sweet Virginia. Get your own material..
Well, are you done scraping? If you start the job finish it so you can finish the rest of your duties at the Waffle House. ;)
 
Last edited:

Jewjitzu

Well-known member
WRONG! Jesus is our High Priest.
Wrong. Priesthood doesn't belong to him. You can't even prove his lineage. Without a physical daddy from the lineage of David, you're dealing with a mamzer. That's unfortunate.

Correct. And you gave zero proof that I said I had proof.
So, you lose either way. Next. You're making progress.

He did when He walked the earth. Urinated and sweat and bled too.
Nope. Zero proof God did. Did you hand your god a square tissue? Scrape his shoes too?

What are Christian morals?
With you, none from what I've seen.

I'll tell you what, enjoy your weekend stiggy and try to recover.

Shabbat Shalom.
 
Last edited:

stiggy wiggy

Well-known member
Wrong. Priesthood doesn't belong to him.

WRONG. Hebrews 4:14. He is our High Priest.. Maybe you need to get you a Bible before mouthing off about it. Next time you're at a Motel 6 open the desk drawer and see if the Gideons lleft one for you.
 

Jewjitzu

Well-known member
WRONG. Hebrews 4:14. He is our High Priest.. Maybe you need to get you a Bible before mouthing off about it. Next time you're at a Motel 6 open the desk drawer and see if the Gideons lleft one for you.
Not for Jews. A High Priest can only be from the Aaronic lineage as promised to him. Show yourself approved, stiggy.

This is another false premise that you've presented.

You sure know lots about Motel 6 and Waffle House.

Tata
 

BMS

Well-known member
But Jesus did by saying divorce wasn't allowed contradicting what God did say.
Except that He didnt by saying God allowed divorce because of their hardness of heart but it wasnt like that in the beginning. This is because the image of God is a man and a woman and, as Jesus quotes, it was for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be united with his wife and the two shall become one flesh. This is why Jesus teaches against divorce.
 

stiggy wiggy

Well-known member
Not for Jews. A High Priest can only be from the Aaronic lineage as promised to him.

What gave you the false notion that I'm a Jew?

Show yourself approved, stiggy.

Not interested in your approval.

This is another false premise that you've presented.

What is? Be specific.

You sure know lots about Motel 6 and Waffle House.

Compared to you, I'm an encyclopedia.


That was rather sissified.

Toodlle oo.
 

Eightcrackers

Well-known member
Only by a very simple-minded literal interpretation of that verse. That's a lot to read into the words "by me". Especially knowing that Jesus often used figurative language. With everything that I've written in our discussion in mind, what might Jesus be conveying in that verse that is more logically consistent with the gospel preached by Jesus in its entirety?
John 3:16-18 says that belief in Jesus = saved, non-belief in Jesus = condemned.

No mention of righteousness; it's "believe" vs "don't".
 

Jewjitzu

Well-known member
Except that He didnt by saying God allowed divorce because of their hardness of heart but it wasnt like that in the beginning.
But, the Torah doesn't say that divorce is allowed because of the hardness of the heart. So, Jesus added to the law.

This is because the image of God is a man and a woman and, as Jesus quotes,
God is neither a man nor woman.

it was for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be united with his wife and the two shall become one flesh. This is why Jesus teaches against divorce.
And yet there are times divorce is allowed by God contrary to Jesus' teaching.
 

Jewjitzu

Well-known member
What gave you the false notion that I'm a Jew?
I never said you were. But since the book of Hebrews was written for a certain audience, the Hebrews, then High Priesthood has nothing to do with Jesus.

BTW, Melkitzedek wasn't a High Priest either.

Not interested in your approval.
And you've utterly failed in your exchanges with me. Study some more.

What is? Be specific.
That Jesus is a High Priest.

Compared to you, I'm an encyclopedia.
When it comes to Waffle House, Motel Six, Marines, Gideon Bible, scraping shoes you've got the market cornered. This must be the Encyclopedia you're referring to. Rotfl...

That was rather sissified.
Aaah, your feelings are hurt? Rotfl...

Toodlle oo.
Enjoy your waffles 🧇.
 
Top