Rand Paul took down Fauci today...

[Authentic Nouveau]

I will let you figure that out, but I meant to say "they (Copeland and Hagan and Joyce Meyers and all of the rest of them) bear out the witness to the fruit of the whole Harlot church that both them and you also belong and are a part of"

You fed us baloney when you said Rand Paul was a dentist and when you pretend you have gift of discernment.

 

[Thistle]

Rand Paul is not a virologist scientist and therefore he ought to stick to his own profession

By training in many years of experience, when is he is not serving as a US representative, Rand Paul is a physician. What exactly do you think it is that physicians do?

 

[Yahweh will increase]

You fed us baloney when you said Rand Paul was a dentist and when you pretend you have gift of discernment.

ROFLOL, and do you really believe that I care how you take that, the fact remains that spiritual discernment is not given for things like knowing for certain what profession someone is of but rather spiritual discernment is given for spiritual matters alone and period.

 

[Thistle]

I will let you figure that out, but I meant to say that they (Copeland and Hagan and Joyce Meyers and all of the rest of them) bear out the witness to the fruit of the whole Harlot church that both them and you also belong and are a part of"

Is that a fact? What does Annas Ben Seth and Joseph ben Caiaphas a witness of?

 

[Yahweh will increase]

You are a medical outsider blow hard. "been getting vaccines since I was a kid"

Learn about your ignorance. Every vaccine is different and every disease is different. The cases of teen males with inflammatory myocarditis after the jab which all had no cardio history tells us a lot. We also see the cases with DVT follow a similar coagulation pattern.

Hey believe what you want and just like every simpleton will do, for that is the risk that comes with any medicines and that is why when they advertise them on TV now they make sure to tell everyone of the risks associated with them for some people but without the medicines many people would die anyhow and usually more lives are saved by them then there are people who die after taking them.

By the way, anyone who believes in Conspiracy theories involved the masses is a complete idiot.

Furthermore, the Bible tells us that we are not wrestling with flesh and blood (and their conspiracies) but rather against principalities and powers and the rulers of the darkness of this world and against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Which means, that what is causing the most damage among unbelievers they are not even aware of because the rulers of the darkness are keeping them in the dark about what they are doing behind the scenes and in the spiritual realm and for certain one way that they are doing this, is by getting people like you, to search for conspiracies of human beings instead.

It is a cleaver diversionary tactic, to get you to look for conspiracies outside and among others while the spirit of antichrist is right in your midst and pulling the wool over your eyes and leading you astray.

 

[Yahweh will increase]

Is that a fact? What does Annas Ben Seth and Joseph ben Caiaphas a witness of?

Never heard of them unless you are talking about the men in the Bible who Jesus was brought before for Judgment, but I don't see how this relates to what I stated????.

 

[Thistle]

Never heard of them unless you are talking about the men in the Bible who Jesus was brought before for Judgment,

That's an extraordinarily lucky guest for someone who never heard of them before.

but I don't see how this relates to what I stated????.

You name a couple of infamous names purportedly associated with the Christian religion and suggested that is evidence of your defamatory assessment of the Christian faith. Would you be equally sanguine of that same kind of procedure applied do your faith? My interest here is in the integrity of your line of argument.

 

[Yahweh will increase]

By training in many years of experience, when is he is not serving as a US representative, Rand Paul is a physician. What exactly do you think it is that physicians do?

Sorry but Rand Paul being a physician of the eyes does not make him an expert virologist scientist by any means.

But while he want to accuse Fauci of what has not yet been proven, he didn't want Fauci to be able to speak in his own defense because every time Fauci tried to explain why he wasn't guilty of what Paul was accusing him, Rand Paul wouldn't let him talk but keep butting in and why do you suppose he did this?

Probably, because he was afraid that if Fauci was able to explain himself, Rand Paul would end up once again looking like and arrogant idiot and which he has a habit of also.

You see I am neither pro Fauci or pro Rand Paul but I am pro "innocent until actually proven guilty by a court of law" and I also hate arrogance when I discern it in someone and God does to and more than me also..

So where does that leave Rand Paul and Donald J. Trump who can't seem to help exposing their arrogance by what comes out of their mouth continually and the way it comes out also?

 

[Yahweh will increase]

That's an extraordinarily lucky guest for someone who never heard of them before.

You name a couple of infamous names purportedly associated with the Christian religion and suggested that is evidence of your defamatory assessment of the Christian faith. Would you be equally sanguine of that same kind of procedure applied do your faith? My interest here is in the integrity of your line of argument.

Hey dude, I belonged to it myself for better than thirty years of my converted to Christ and born again life, and I have witnessed first hand the social selfishness and money greed of those who claim to belong to God but do not have the love of Jesus with impartiality and then there are the many contradicting false doctrines also and which is why they are in that condition to start with.

I tried for years to push all of this under the rug and just forgive and forget the mess, but God wouldn't let me but kept revealing from the scriptures the many contradicting errors in their teachings and which is the main issue with me.

For I have been there and done that and I have seen it and lived around it and it is hogwash and not the Christianity that Jesus taught.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

By training in many years of experience, when is he is not serving as a US representative, Rand Paul is a physician. What exactly do you think it is that physicians do?

That guy said Rand Paul was a dentist. Do Ophthamologists pull "eye teeth"" Asking for our neighbor kid's short bus friend.

 

[Yahweh will increase]

That guy said Rand Paul was a dentist. Do Ophthamologists pull "eye teeth"" Asking for our neighbor kid's short bus friend.

Isn't it a shame that you really can't refute what I said and therefore you have to turn to repeat your pathetic nonsense over and over again and like what you did again in the above and when it doesn't refute a thing that I said other than my mistake that I said Paul was a dentist and which is hardly worth your repeating it over and over.


The fact is, that Rand Paul wanted to accuse Fauci but then wouldn't let Fauci explain why he was not guilty of what he was being accused of and which is completely rude and also arrogant and I have always believed that if one makes an accusation, they should give the one they are accusing the ability to defend himself and which Paul wouldn't do.

Probably because he was afraid that if he ever stopped yapping over Fauci when he was trying to explain himself, he would have been proven a fool once again.

I am not even pro Fauci, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt until he is proven guilty in a court of law but what you people are doing with this is flat out evil and not Christian at all.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

Isn't it a shame that you really can't refute what I said and therefore you have to turn to your pathetic nonsense in the above.

The fact is, that Rand Paul wanted to accuse Fauci but then wouldn't let Fauci explain why he was not guilty of what he was being accused of and which is completely rude and also arrogant and I have always believed that if one makes an accusation, they should give the one they are accusing the ability to defend himself and which Paul wouldn't do.

Probably because he was afraid that if he ever stopped yapping over Fauci when he was trying to explain himself, he would have been proven a fool once again.

I am not even pro Fauci, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt until he is proven guilty in a court of law but what you people are doing with this is flat out evil and not Christian at all.

Don't waste our time. Rand Paul has documents that support and trace money that was sent and no need for toni to mouth off and "explain".
The evidence speaks for itself. The acknowledgment by The lab scientist is evidence. Toni wanted to mouth off and got all defensive.

Fauchi was caught.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

Isn't it a shame that you really can't refute what I said and therefore you have to turn to repeat your pathetic nonsense over and over again and like what you did again in the above and when it doesn't refute a thing that I said other than my mistake that I said Paul was a dentist and which is hardly worth your repeating it over and over.


The fact is, that Rand Paul wanted to accuse Fauci but then wouldn't let Fauci explain why he was not guilty of what he was being accused of and which is completely rude and also arrogant and I have always believed that if one makes an accusation, they should give the one they are accusing the ability to defend himself and which Paul wouldn't do.

Probably because he was afraid that if he ever stopped yapping over Fauci when he was trying to explain himself, he would have been proven a fool once again.

I am not even pro Fauci, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt until he is proven guilty in a court of law but what you people are doing with this is flat out evil and not Christian at all.

Why are EDIT foe several insults

 

[Thistle]

Sorry but Rand Paul being a physician of the eyes does not make him an expert virologist scientist by any means.

You're not answering the question. What skills and capabilities do physicians have to have before considering their specialty? Do you plan on answering the question this time?

But while he want to accuse Fauci of what has not yet been proven,

First of all, he believes it's true. Secondly, it's his job. Thirdly, the full investigation comes after the criminal referral.

he didn't want Fauci to be able to speak in his own defense because every time Fauci tried to explain why he wasn't guilty of what Paul was accusing him, Rand Paul wouldn't let him talk but keep butting in and why do you suppose he did this?

Fauci was re-casting and changing the nature of the question so he could misdirect until the time the Rand Paul had expired. Rand Paul's refusal to let Fauci rope a dope out the clock was exactly correct, completely germane and effective to the proper purpose the Constitution gives Congress oversight of the executive branch.

Probably, because he was afraid that if Fauci was able to explain himself,

The two people who understood the points at issue were Rand Paul and Fauci. Fauci lied and Rand Paul is not going to allow him to run out the clock with a canned pre-prepared answer that would accomplish that very objective.

Rand Paul would end up once again looking like and arrogant idiot and which he has a habit of also.

Fauci's criminal testimony before Congress is not really affected one way or the other by your opinion of Rand Rand.

You see I am neither pro Fauci or pro Rand Paul

Then I congratulate you on your ability to conceal that.

but I am pro "innocent until actually proven guilty by a court of law"

Congratulations, you just saw how being proven guilty starts.

and I also hate arrogance when I discern it in someone

You can see all that pretty well too…

and God does to and more than me also..

True enough

So where does that leave Rand Paul and Donald J. Trump

I didn't see Donald Trump in that hearing.

who can't seem to help exposing their arrogance by what comes out of their mouth continually and the way it comes out also?

If you find Donald Trump to be arrogant in someway that is not exceeded by his detractors, I must say I'm completely gobsmacked by that.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

You're not answering the question. What skills and capabilities do physicians have to have before considering their specialty? Do you plan on answering the question this time?

First of all, he believes it's true. Secondly, it's his job. Thirdly, the full investigation comes after the criminal referral.

Fauci was re-casting and changing the nature of the question so he could misdirect until the time the Rand Paul had expired. Rand Paul's refusal to let Fauci rope a dope out the clock was exactly correct, completely germane and effective to the proper purpose the Constitution gives Congress oversight of the executive branch.

The two people who understood the points at issue were Rand Paul and Fauci. Fauci lied and Rand Paul is not going to allow him to run out the clock with a canned pre-prepared answer that would accomplish that very objective.

I Fauci's criminal testimony before Congress is not really affected one way or the other by your opinion of Rand Rand.

Then I congratulate you on your ability to conceal that.

Congratulations, you just saw how being proven guilty starts.

You can see all that pretty well too…

True enough

I didn't see Donald Trump in that hearing.

If you find Donald Trump to be arrogant in someway that is not exceeded by his detractors, I must say I'm completely gobsmacked by that.

So Rand Paul gave Fauchi opportunity to correct previous testimony under oath and he refused.

With your good memory, do you remember Commie right before the election announced some very damaging information about Hillary investigation?
He knew the law and knew it was his nipple in a wringer. He had a legal ongoing duty to amend previous testimony for HIS own protection.

He had testified in August was accused of throwing election favor away from Hillary while he was just covering his own anatomy.

 

[Thistle]

So Rand Paul gave Fauchi opportunity to correct previous testimony under oath and he refused.

He took the advice of his public relations firm rather than his attorneys.

With your good memory, do you remember Commie right before the election announced some very damaging information about Hillary investigation?

What does ring a bell…

He knew the law and knew it was his nipple in a wringer. He had a legal ongoing duty to amend previous testimony for HIS own protection.

Indeed

He had testified in August was accused of throwing election favor away from Hillary while he was just covering his own anatomy.

So it seemed.

 

[Yahweh will increase]

You're not answering the question. What skills and capabilities do physicians have to have before considering their specialty? Do you plan on answering the question this time?

First of all, he believes it's true. Secondly, it's his job. Thirdly, the full investigation comes after the criminal referral.

Fauci was re-casting and changing the nature of the question so he could misdirect until the time the Rand Paul had expired. Rand Paul's refusal to let Fauci rope a dope out the clock was exactly correct, completely germane and effective to the proper purpose the Constitution gives Congress oversight of the executive branch.

The two people who understood the points at issue were Rand Paul and Fauci. Fauci lied and Rand Paul is not going to allow him to run out the clock with a canned pre-prepared answer that would accomplish that very objective.

Fauci's criminal testimony before Congress is not really affected one way or the other by your opinion of Rand Rand.

Then I congratulate you on your ability to conceal that.

Congratulations, you just saw how being proven guilty starts.

You can see all that pretty well too…

True enough

I didn't see Donald Trump in that hearing.

If you find Donald Trump to be arrogant in someway that is not exceeded by his detractors, I must say I'm completely gobsmacked by that.

Sorry but I am not going to accommodate you or waste any of my time with you so you can practice your nonsensical argumentation as you are doing with your long winded post above.

You need to get this through your head, Fauci is still a free man and hasn't yet been convicted and if you call yourself a believer, you need to put the breaks on about this and get on to what the real business of the church is and it isn't to overly concern yourself with the affair of those outside of the church like you are doing with this.

If Fauci hasn't been convicted yet in a real court of law, then you shouldn't be playing judge, jury and executioner over him like what you are doing but you need to leave it to the law and get on with the business of doing what God has instructed his church to do instead.

By the way, EDIT for insult

 

[Thistle]

Sorry but I am not going to accommodate you or waste any of my time with you so you can practice your nonsensical argumentation as you are doing with your long winded post above.

You're working with some pretty liberal definitions. My longest comment was three sentences.

You need to get this through your head,

I'm perfectly capable of judging what I need; I'm happy to hear your comment.

Fauci is still a free man

As is every person who is not a convict.

and hasn't yet been convicted

Some criminals are never convicted.

and if you call yourself a believer, you need to put the breaks on about this and get on to what the real business of the church is and it isn't to overly concern yourself with the affair of those outside of the church like you are doing with this.

In a republic like ours where sovereignty flows from God to men and from men to the government, the concerns of the republic at some point devolve to every citizen, even if the citizen is a believer.

If Fauci hasn't been convicted yet in a real court of law, then you shouldn't be playing judge, jury and executioner over him like what you are doing

Congress has oversight over Fauci he is a federal employee in the executive branch. He lied to Congress. I heard his testimony in both instances, and he clearly lied. That's a statement of fact that I can ascertain before the legal process begins. I'm not going to refuse to acknowledge that in a conversation where it is absolutely central to the point.

but you need to leave it to the law

Again this is a republic where sovereignty flows from God to man to the government, thus all public corruption is the concern of every citizen, even if the Citizen happens to be a believer.

and get on with the business of doing what God has instructed his church to do instead.

It would be quite wrong to take the New Testament commands of Jesus to his church in such a way as believers would be so heavenly minded that they are of no earthly use. That was not the sum, substance, nor meaning of Jesus commands to his church.

By the way, that little demon you have for your Avatar suits you well with what you are doing on this thread..

Demon? Give people a chance and they will reveal themselves…

 

[Thistle]

That guy said Rand Paul was a dentist. Do Ophthamologists pull "eye teeth"" Asking for our neighbor kid's short bus friend.

I'm not entirely sure but he does seem to have a bit of an attitude.

 

[Backup]

, Rand Paul is a physician. What exactly do you think it is that physicians do?

Rand Paul is an eye doctor, who got COVID, like so many deniers, because he didn’t have the horse sense to avoid it.

Why would anyone listen to him about the vaccine? He is unqualified and already proven himself to be an idiot when it comes to the virus.