Regarding Nestorius

D

Diogenes

Guest

Yakuda

Well-known member
If anyone is interested in what Nestorius actually advocated you can read a translation of his work from the link below. It's available in text, PDF, and Kindle versions.

Its quite simple. He taught Jesus' divine nature and human nature were separate. They aren't.
 

1Thess521

Well-known member
Its quite simple. He taught Jesus' divine nature and human nature were separate. They aren't.
FALSE; that is not what Nestorius taught
"The doctrine of Nestorius, patriarch of Constantinople (appointed in 428), by which Christ is asserted to have had distinct human and divine persons"

Chalcedonian Creed

"Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons,"


The adopted Creed specifically maintained the two distinct natures of Christ (divine and human)

 
Last edited:
Top