No Stella, this is what "begs the question" - if any one who has been a professing active Baptist their entire life and yet plainly states verbally, that "in the mass a true and proper sacrifice is not offered to God; or, that to be offered is nothing but that Christ is given man to eat," would that person be "anathema?"
I would rather be considered an anathema before man rather than GOD.
WHY does the Roman Catholic Church think that they have the right or power to pass judgement on ANYONE??? Just look and listen to the representatives of the RCC in this forum! The Church of Roman Catholicism would have undoubtedly been the FIRST to crucify Jesus Christ!
Because they say they do, and their followers all bow down and say, "Yes, O Masters, You do have that power!" These days, the RCC's power is derived solely from the consent of their peeons, unlike back when they could enforce their rule by military strength.
Well, yes, the Pharisees were certain they knew what the Messiah would do. Then when the true Messiah showed up, not looking at all like their idolic messiah, they rejected Him. Then when they thought He had more power over the people than they did, they responded with, "Crucify Him!"
You have to love the way RCs carry on that on one can judge yet all they do is judge. They judge who are heretics, who are damned, who are to be excommunicated. The excommunicated is normally women especially those who have abortions, but priests who molest children are not. That alone says a lot about the hypocrisy of the RCC.
But it was not taught in RC schools in Australia. We were taught only RCs went to heaven. Limbo for unbaptised babies and a few others if they were very very very lucky.
Well the RCC had Judas damned for centuries. It is only under this latest regime that has changed.
No. It doesn't apply to a cradle Baptist.... who is understood in this way....
Oh, I see Stella, now you are changing the words and the meaning, in the authoritative statements of Roman Catholic teaching on the Sacrifice of the Mass ..... which are the very words I posted from the Council of Trent . . . Session XXII: On the Sacrifice of the Mass . . . . Canon 1: . . . . . .
RCs love having the power to decide who God will accept into the kingdom and who He reject. But they don't judge anyone, yep sure, we are gullible and believe them.
The anathemas are only addressed to believers. Not to pagans or Muslims or any other religious non Christian. At the time of the Council of Trent, all Christians were Catholics or direct descendants of Catholics. Today, many Christians are far removed from the original protestors and can't be culpable for any sin involved in the original separation.
Prove that claim about Trent. No real Christians were Catholics. Luther committed sin standing up to false teachers who failed to meet the scriptural requirements for leaders. That is hogwash.
Oh, sorry balshan, Stella can't answer that because she is just far too busy ordering "take-outs" from her daddy, the Roman Catholic Church.
Stella is afraid of my posts and will not answer them, I am sure she has many excuses for that. I am glad to be on most RCs ignore lists, it proves I am posting the truth.
Amen! Every former Roman Catholic in here knows you post the truth too! It's only the Roman Catholics who are clueless because they are steeped in false teaching and information, which is just the way the RCC wants to keep them. They only hear the trained voices of their masters who are routinely programmed to indoctrinate the pew peons as to what their "church" teaches, and then, thinking it is true, they post it on here!
Maybe. I think they have gone back to Egypt and are "deep in de Nile".
True. Just look at the fits RCs have in trying to come up with an answer to "what more than faith is needed to be saved?" The RCC's "wise guys" have been incapable of answering that (other than with the sword) for nearly half a millennium.
I am wonder is the sentence i highlighted referring to ex RCs or RCs?
Sorry for the confusion. ? It's the RCC and its followers who I believe have gone back to Egypt. "Oooh! The fish! Oooh! The melons! The garlic! The easy life!"
I was sure you did but I was confused not your fault. It seems to be my way worse I rang my GP, when he was seeing my son, unknown to me. At the same time my son sent me a text saying he was there. I said to the GP say hello to my son, that started him making out my son wasn't there. He said we were trying to confuse you. I said no need I do that my self. But we laughed. The one thing I am not confused about is Jesus and that the RCC is clearly not what they claim to be.