You know, I am getting a little tired of having the right opinion all the time. Down right tiring. [That is a pretty hefty serving of sarcasm...]Sorry that is just your opinion
Yes, but the verse you used was about physical baptism, which is why it is used to support baptismal regeneration, and not your opinion. The problem is, your opinion in scripture does not support your original premise, so you chose to support baptismal regeneration.Colossians 3
"11 In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead. 13 And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, 14 by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross. 15 He disarmed the rulers and authorities[b] and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him.[c]"
Just as the circumcision was spiritual and not the literal cutting of flesh so also the baptism was spiritual