I have directly addressed that
HERE, and shown from scripture how faith precedes a heart of flesh, and a new life and spirit. You admitted that commands from God are obeyed by unbelievers, so your idea that you need the Spirit to obey is false, and Acts 5:32 proves that idea is unscriptural.
Your repeating this only serves to avoid the damage being done to the false doctrine of regeneration before faith. By your own inability to deny that truth, you admit that commands can be obeyed by those with a heart of stone. The bible speaks to this directly, both by examples like Balaam, and statements like Romans 2, which says that those without the law do things contained in the law. Faith in His blood is how He washes us, through faith. Thats how ez 26:25 is explained in the NT. That comes before a heart of flesh, its what takes you from a heart of stone to a heart of flesh. Your doctrine teaches life in sin, which is heretical.
You admit the truth that unbelievers can and do obey Gods commands. The bible proves it when Balaam obeyed God while being unrighteous.
You never answered HOW God cleansed you as He promised in Ez 36:25?
You never addressed how Ez 36:25-27 follows the exact same pattern (removal of sin before new heart/spirit) in FOUR other passages???
You never explained how you were able to obtain a promise of God
before faith, in light of what the word says in Heb 6:12, and 11:33?
You never answered to why you believe one needs the Spirit to obtain faith, seeing what the bible says in Gal 3:2, 5, and 14?
We have no idea how you reconcile your beliefs with Acts 5:32, since you wont even mention it.
Another one for you, number 9 lie.
Lying is a sin, and does pay a wage. So in that regard, you are right, you are collecting something..
Keep lying. This loop began when you admitted anyone can obey Gods commands, and your argument went out the window.
@Rockson gave you the type of answer you wanted
HERE, and the next post was just a whimper. Proving that you dont really have a substantive response to the issues your doctrine presents, and this is all just a diversion.
