that comes from not knowing / understanding His word.The bread and wine are the body and blood of Christ - at least according to Jesus.
the rcc doesn't teach it.
that comes from not knowing / understanding His word.The bread and wine are the body and blood of Christ - at least according to Jesus.
According to Jesus it is symbolic. Or else Peter is SatanThe bread and wine are the body and blood of Christ - at least according to Jesus.
just nothing addedMaybe read my posts in full, they are not long.
good for a DH... it's the fielding that is needed ?I had 6 brothers they taught me how to bat.
welcome to the Catholic Church ??believers already know His truth.
We don't eat a wafer, we receive Christ.that happens in the rebirth, not eating a wafer.
It doesn't. We aren't supposed to follow false teachers.where does scripture say anyone receives Him by denying His Son and following a false teacher?
If you have Him in you as you claimed earlier, why do you need to keep receiving Him?We don't eat a wafer, we receive Christ.
Nourishment; renewal of the covenant. Our relationship with God comes in Baptism. God nourishes us in the Eucharist as well as renews the covenant.If you have Him in you as you claimed earlier, why do you need to keep receiving Him?
Nourishment; renewal of the covenant.
Our relationship with God comes in Baptism.
God nourishes us in the Eucharist as well as renews the covenant.
Seriously? No, really, I mean SERIOUSLY?Where does Scripture say this?
We are not trying to get you to follow us. we are pointing to Jesus Christ. but you and your fellow rc's are more interested in following you anti-Christ pompous maximus.It doesn't. We aren't supposed to follow false teachers.
That is why I do not follow you or any of the other Protestants on this site.
You are right, you and your fellow rc's show us that every day.Seriously? No, really, I mean SERIOUSLY?
You know, 4-Him, there are somethings that just can't be taught.
Doesn't scripture feed us?Nourishment; renewal of the covenant. Our relationship with God comes in Baptism. God nourishes us in the Eucharist as well as renews the covenant.
why 'either/or'? ?Doesn't scripture feed us?
That Peter was prominent in the life of the early church is undeniable, but nowhere in the writings of the apostles is there the slightest hint that any of the other apostles treated Peter as the head of the church - the spiritual head of God's people. Jesus never made Peter, nor any of his supposed successors, a Roman Catholic pope.f you isolate all of the verses concerning Peter--such as Peter and the keys, "Feed my sheep" "I have prayed for you that your Faith may not fail" etc, no one verse alone proves anything.
Catholics believe that the combination of verses, the confluence of the verses gives strong indications of the papacy. The verses read together, not in isolation give strong indications of a papacy.
Do I agree--one verse with Jesus saying to Peter "feed my sheep" proves very little. But taking that verse in context with everything else in the New Testament--certainly gives strong indications of a papacy. The only reason someone would deny this--is simply becasue they do not want to believe in a papacy.
Seriously? No, really, I mean SERIOUSLY?
mica said:
believers already know His truth.
you're wrong again... still.welcome to the Catholic Church ??
mica said:
where does scripture say anyone receives Him by denying His Son and following a false teacher?
yet you do - the rcc.It doesn't. We aren't supposed to follow false teachers.
not all here are protestants - but we know catholics use that word to be derogatory. believers don't protest God's word, the rcc does that.That is why I do not follow you or any of the other Protestants on this site.
eat -->God cannot be eaten Balshan. God can be received, but not eaten.
I do not believe I am eating God, I believe I am receiving God and he is nourishing my soul.