Remember when Obama investigated Trump during Transistion?

DeSanto

Well-known member
No riots yet, but a bunch of your compatriots have been stopped on their way to kill people.
Huh? My compatriots?
Same thing; a bunch of right-wing terrorist plots have been foiled. Nerd-raging conservative videos are found all over Youtube. And really, the meltdown is happening here, too; in this little forum.
Oh, you mean fake MAGA antifa thugs trying to set up (ie. frame) conservatives and project their crimes onto them in order to distort public perception?
 
Last edited:

DieBrille

Member
It's what we're surrounded with 7-24-365. OF course there's always "Days of our lives", "90 day fiance", "The Masked Singer", or "House hunters International" - if you need more intelligent intellectual input.
Then stay at the intellectual level you feel at home with.
But don't claim you have anything worthwhile to say from that level.
 

Harry Leggs

Well-known member
Right now, Republicans in PA are saying Biden has probably won :D


In other news Jeff Toobin shown the door at Rolling Stone for weenie waggin. Underage or barely legal?

Jeffrey Toobin Fired by The New Yorker Following Zoom Call Incident | Newsmax.com

You do you, but the rest of us are enjoying the right-wing meltdown.
Right there are around 72 million angry Trump voters as distinct from Repubs. Dead people vote by unsolicited mail ballots I.E. postal voting. Dem initiated cheating. No ID check and eliminate signature verification in mail-ins making it easier to cheat. That is why they advocated for postal voting. So they could cheat and break federal law. The Dems and the left media, all advocates of felony crimes.

3:15 in

 
Last edited:

Thistle

Well-known member
Good, you win a cookie.
Therefore the talk about "President Elect Biden" is unambiguously ignorant. And any and all leaders who have congratulated Biden are galactically stupid.
There are still plenty of results, and for the most part, Biden is scheduled to win :D
The process is continuing and it looks like it will continue quite a while longer.
If you're not going to bother getting even the slightest details right,
We can't have that; I stand ready to be corrected. Please feel free to lower the boom.
why waste your time posting about them?
What we have here is two fold. Number one, you conceded my point, as though you had any choice. Number two you failed to present a lucid argument. Thus we have (to quote from Cool Hand Luke) "a failure to communicate." At least on your part. "Loose your [argument] spend a night in the box."
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
Right there are around 72 million angry Trump voters as distinct from Repubs. Dead people vote by unsolicited mail ballots I.E. postal voting. Dem initiated cheating. No ID check and eliminate signature verification in mail-ins making it easier to cheat. That is why they advocated for postal voting. So they could cheat and break federal law. The Dems and the left media, all advocates of felony crimes.
Neither you nor anybody else has any idea how many "angry Trump voters" there are. We have no idea what percentage of people who voted for Trump have accepted the result and how many, like you, are protesting it.

Of course, there is no evidence to support any of the protests.
 

Whateverman

Well-known member
Right there are around 72 million angry Trump voters as distinct from Repubs. Dead people vote by unsolicited mail ballots I.E. postal voting. Dem initiated cheating. No ID check and eliminate signature verification in mail-ins making it easier to cheat. That is why they advocated for postal voting. So they could cheat and break federal law. The Dems and the left media, all advocates of felony crimes.

3:15 in

That got taken down in record time ;)
 

Harry Leggs

Well-known member
Neither you nor anybody else has any idea how many "angry Trump voters"
It is a safe deduction knowing they were cheated.
We have no idea what percentage of people who voted for Trump have accepted the result and how many, like you, are protesting it.
If you have no idea then why believe you?
Of course, there is no evidence to support any of the protests.
It is little early and Repubs are not toxic Dems. Anyways this is the Tuker youtube documenting dead vote when MSM declared no evidence of vote fraud anywhere. Now a documented lie by a bunch of incompetents. MSM =main stream media or leftist hacks.

 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
It is a safe deduction knowing they were cheated.
No, it's not, since we have no idea how many are under the delusion that they were 'cheated' and how many have just accepted the disappointing fact that their candidate lost.
If you have no idea then why believe you?
Nobody has any idea, despite your claims.
It is little early and Repubs are not toxic Dems. Anyways this is the Tuker youtube documenting dead vote when MSM declared no evidence of vote fraud anywhere. Now a documented lie by a bunch of incompetents. MSM =main stream media or leftist hacks.
No, toxic Repubs are certainly not Dems. And it's been a week. Some cases have already been presented (and thrown out). Just how long will this take?
Please. Do you really think that any rational person takes any Tucker youtube video as evidence of anything at all?

Evidence. When will the voluminous evidence be presented to a court?
 

CrowCross

Well-known member
Well if it is all above board then what are you afraid of? What about transparency?

They even predicted a mess with postal voting and now we have vote machines to investigate. A hand recount in Georgia. There is no way Biden legally won Pennsylvania. Not with job-killing energy policies. Why does the left hate blue-collar workers? The left, the party of job killers and hate America first.
It's not about hating blue colar workers...it's more about bringing in the New World Order. Collapsing America and the world.
 

CrowCross

Well-known member
Good, you win a cookie. There are still plenty of results, and for the most part, Biden is scheduled to win :D

If you're not going to bother getting even the slightest details right, why waste your time posting about them?
"Biden is scheduled to win"...how true. Just like Hillary was scheduled to win last time. Are you ready for the final straw if Biden..oops, Harris gets in?
 

Harry Leggs

Well-known member
No, it's not, since we have no idea how

You have no idea because of where your head is at.
many are under the delusion that they were 'cheated'
It must be above your skill level to distinguish between a delusion and an evidence-based deduction. The only delusion here (and delusion is a euphemism for outright lying) is from folks like you who are in denial.
and how many have just accepted the disappointing fact that their candidate lost.
Fact (Trump lost) is a straight-up lie at this point. Trump has not lost anything.
Nobody has any idea, despite your claims.
Well if nobody has any idea then what disappointing fact are you referencing? It cannot be Trump lost as you wrote. So you are contradicting yourself.
Please. Do you really think that any rational person takes any Tucker youtube video as evidence of anything at all?
Then falsify the dead vote referenced. Prove it wrong. If you can't, then by your definition, no rational person should take you seriously. Doubtful you even took the time to watch the video.
Evidence. When will the voluminous evidence be presented to a court?
Be patient.
 

Whateverman

Well-known member
Fact (Trump lost) is a straight-up lie at this point. Trump has not lost anything.
Fact is that Republicans were saying Hillary Clinton lost at this same point in time in 2016.

It's hilarious that you've all suddenly become sticklers for detail, terminology and electoral rules - now that your orange messiah has been kicked to the curb. In an actual landslide, too - rather than the fake one y'all trumpeted for the last 4 years.
 

Whateverman

Well-known member
"Biden is scheduled to win"...how true. Just like Hillary was scheduled to win last time.
Nope. Biden is scheduled to drag ****** out of the white house kicking and screaming on January 21, barring some weird court ruling which appears less-and less likely as each day passes :D
 

Harry Leggs

Well-known member
Fact is that Republicans were saying Hillary Clinton lost at this same point in time in 2016.
So? There was no vote fraud and Hillary always came out and insinuated she won via the popular vote. Also, the origin of Russia collusion is Hillary. As far as Hillary was concerned she was cheated. She still lost. She still conceded. Trump has not conceded. Big difference. The Dems did all they could and more to destabilize the Trump Presidency and got away with it. Right up to and including this election. The Dems once again threw this country into a train wreck. There are people behind bars that have did far less damage than the Dems have to this country and they are out walking free spreading their venom with impunity.

This time is different in that the Dems changed the rules from 2016 to increase their chances of winning (rig the game so they couldn't lose) with unsolicited postal voting. No ID, no in person, and that is just one aspect. There are the vote machines that need to be examined.
It's hilarious that you've all suddenly become sticklers for detail, terminology and electoral rules
They make a difference when the results are disputed with evidence.
- now that your orange messiah has been kicked to the curb.
Right now that is a straight-up lie. I don't know what you guys are sniveling about.
In an actual landslide, too
That is what raised the red flags. Again. Biden could not get 50 people at his rallies prior to the election and spent most time at home. Biden did not even try. Then Biden pulls ahead at different Dem controlled locations at about the same time (dead of night).
- rather than the fake one y'all trumpeted for the last 4 years.
Trump Presidency was real, not fake.
 
Last edited:

Harry Leggs

Well-known member
Nope. Biden is scheduled to drag ****** out of the white house kicking and screaming on January 21, barring some weird court ruling which appears less-and less likely as each day passes :D
You are not referencing the right sources. That much is obvious.
 
Top