Rev Darwin preaches white supremacy and offers zero biology. No discussion of proteins.

Harry Leggs

Well-known member
Well that's a big swing and a miss....
How so? Either way your use of the term moron indicative of inequality and is hateful. So lets not give lip service to equality when what you do speaks much louder
The science behind evolutionary biology is light years beyond what Darwin could have imagined.
Not really. They still believe in common ancestry via Darwin.
Whatever he believed or didn't believe is irrelevant to the validity of the modern theory.
Your belief in fish ancestry of humans is not valid nor is it science.

So you acknowledge Darwin believed in race inequality. And what big science advances have falsified racial inequality? That being since humans and apes are biological cousins? Does that mean you all believe humans and apes are equal or unequal?

There are two models. Humans and apes are biologically related thru a mystery common ancestor or they are not biologically related at all and there is plenty of observable evidence for that.
 

Mr Laurier

Well-known member
Charlies was not a believer in racial equality. Charlies believed in race inequality and why not? That is why Darwinists' assent to race equality is suspected for social reasons as opposed to science convictions. Lip service and nothing more. Your use of the term moron denotes inferiority which means inequality so it sounds like you are on board with all this although it is doubtful Darwin was as hostile or hateful as you appear to be. Moron in this context sounds like hate speech. A sub for the N-word.
Darwin however, rejected the prevailing racist norms of his society and culture. He accepted, as few englishmen did, that negros in Africa, and hindaloos in India, were as fully human as kentishmen in the south of England. An idea that scandalized most of his fellow christians at the time.
 

Kwiitsupaitu

Active member
How so? Either way your use of the term moron indicative of inequality and is hateful. So lets not give lip service to equality when what you do speaks much louder

Not really. They still believe in common ancestry via Darwin.

Your belief in fish ancestry of humans is not valid nor is it science.

So you acknowledge Darwin believed in race inequality. And what big science advances have falsified racial inequality? That being since humans and apes are biological cousins? Does that mean you all believe humans and apes are equal or unequal?

There are two models. Humans and apes are biologically related thru a mystery common ancestor or they are not biologically related at all and there is plenty of observable evidence for that.
Moron? It's not a judgement, it's an observation...

I'm not going to spend my morning trying to correct your epic level of misunderstanding regarding evolutionary biology...
 
Top