Roe vs Wade benefits everybody

DaGeo

Active member
No, it is indeed a minority opinion. Repeated polls show that the majority thinks Roe vs Wade should remain, and that every woman should have the right to abortion.


No, you're not. You might be trying to do so, but you're not.
Can’t believe there are still people appealing to such fallacious reasoning.

Maybe the world really was flat back them‼️😂😂🤣🤣

SHEEEEESH‼️‼️‼️🙄
 

Temujin

Well-known member
Your denials are getting more lengthy but less relevant. Can you explain this comical dichotomy.

I have a suggestion, why don’t you confer with “electric skeptic” before posting 🤣🤣😂😂
Why? I am not responsible for his opinions and how he expresses them. Nor is he responsible for mine. If you actually cared to address any actual points made rather than flitting about like a malignant gnat who has just learnt how to use emojiis, there might be a discussion to be had. Instead you are busily scoring points off imaginary posters who have said imaginary things and trying, but failing to link them to actual posters here.

Come on, let's see if you can construct a truthful sentence. What is it that you claim that I am denying?
 

DaGeo

Active member
Again, what do YOU consider to be a "scientifically verifiable transitional form"?What definition are YOU using for this term? Until you answer this, your question is meaningless, and therefore unanswerable. I suspect that you are not answering because doing so would reveal that you know very little about evolution and that you are vaguely aware of that. Quit the bluster and be specific. What precisely is it that you want us to show you, and why do you think it is relevant to the facts of evolution?
There you go again. Did you check with electric skeptic before you posted??? Perhaps he is nearby—just in case?? 🤣🤣😂😂😂

You’re telling me I know little about evolution—compared to what—-you⁉️⁉️😂😂🤣

Ok, allow me to indulge your acute ignorance. This may come to you like a news flash—-I don’t invent evolutionary terminology‼️‼️‼️ I do what you should be doing, I question the myth makers themselves—the evolutionist to explain what they mean by the terms they use.

Are ya with me so far⁉️⁉️

SO, where do we go for information about evolution⁉️ To the evolutionist—right ??

An online Berkeley evolutionist says this: A transitional form is a “fossil that shows an intermediate state between an ancestral trait and that of its later descendants is said to bear a transitional feature.”

There’s ONE evolutionary definition for ya.
Hope that helps

there ya go‼️‼️
 

DaGeo

Active member
Why? I am not responsible for his opinions and how he expresses them. Nor is he responsible for mine. If you actually cared to address any actual points made rather than flitting about like a malignant gnat who has just learnt how to use emojiis, there might be a discussion to be had. Instead you are busily scoring points off imaginary posters who have said imaginary things and trying, but failing to link them to actual posters here.

Come on, let's see if you can construct a truthful sentence. What is it that you claim that I am denying?
Come on, don’t go sour on me just because you occasionally need help explaining what you believe. BTW, You haven’t thanked me for all the help I’ve offered you

Ah, don’t mention it😂👍
 

DaGeo

Active member
Why? I am not responsible for his opinions and how he expresses them. Nor is he responsible for mine. If you actually cared to address any actual points made rather than flitting about like a malignant gnat who has just learnt how to use emojiis, there might be a discussion to be had. Instead you are busily scoring points off imaginary posters who have said imaginary things and trying, but failing to link them to actual posters here.

Come on, let's see if you can construct a truthful sentence. What is it that you claim that I am denying?
Oh so now the evolutionists I quote are imaginary posters—-ok suit yourself
 

Temujin

Well-known member
There you go again. Did you check with electric skeptic before you posted??? Perhaps he is nearby—just in case?? 🤣🤣😂😂😂

You’re telling me I know little about evolution—compared to what—-you⁉️⁉️😂😂🤣

Ok, allow me to indulge your acute ignorance. This may come to you like a news flash—-I don’t invent evolutionary terminology‼️‼️‼️ I do what you should be doing, I question the myth makers themselves—the evolutionist to explain what they mean by the terms they use.

Are ya with me so far⁉️⁉️

SO, where do we go for information about evolution⁉️ To the evolutionist—right ??

An online Berkeley evolutionist says this: A transitional form is a “fossil that shows an intermediate state between an ancestral trait and that of its later descendants is said to bear a transitional feature.”

There’s ONE evolutionary definition for ya.
Hope that helps

there ya go‼️‼️
Link? I suspect that you are quote-mining. I am happy to run with this definition if that is what you want, but I would still like to see verification of the Berkeley "evolutionist. Not that I don't trust your integrity, of course.

Assuming you answer, you will have to wait until tomorrow for a response from me. I'm off to bed.
 

Temujin

Well-known member
Oh so now the evolutionists I quote are imaginary posters—-ok suit yourself
Evolutionists are imaginary. There are normal people with mainstream education and scientific understanding. There are normal people with specific and specialised scientific knowledge and understanding. And there are Creationists with no scientific understanding.
 

DaGeo

Active member
Evolutionists are imaginary. There are normal people with mainstream education and scientific understanding. There are normal people with specific and specialised scientific knowledge and understanding. And there are Creationists with no scientific understanding.
If you think evolution is science, you have a really good sense of humor
 

DaGeo

Active member
Link? I suspect that you are quote-mining. I am happy to run with this definition if that is what you want, but I would still like to see verification of the Berkeley "evolutionist. Not that I don't trust your integrity, of course.

Assuming you answer, you will have to wait until tomorrow for a response from me. I'm off to bed.
I tried explaining to you the meaning of evolution from a real evolutionist and they all agree pretty much to the same definition but you can’t even believe your own kind. I don’t think you understand yourself let alone those like you. That’s why you need me to explain the myth of evolution to you!!
You’re HILARIOUS‼️‼️‼️

If what you say goes viral, you might land a gig with Comedy Central ‼️‼️‼️😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😇😇
 

DaGeo

Active member
Link? I suspect that you are quote-mining. I am happy to run with this definition if that is what you want, but I would still like to see verification of the Berkeley "evolutionist. Not that I don't trust your integrity, of course.

Assuming you answer, you will have to wait until tomorrow for a response from me. I'm off to bed.
Ok, here’s your link. Now school yourself 😂😂🤣🤣👍

Come now, you can trust me, you're related to me, remember⁉️⁉️🥸

https://evolution.berkeley.edu › glossary › transitional-forms

Need more help, just ask. I have more jokes to tell and even more myth links to share copy and paste. Whatever it takes

Quote mining, say you? You’re waaay too suspicious. 🤠
 
Last edited:

Temujin

Well-known member
I tried explaining to you the meaning of evolution from a real evolutionist and they all agree pretty much to the same definition but you can’t even believe your own kind. I don’t think you understand yourself let alone those like you. That’s why you need me to explain the myth of evolution to you!!
You’re HILARIOUS‼️‼️‼️

If what you say goes viral, you might land a gig with Comedy Central ‼️‼️‼️😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😇😇
When you were last in school, (yesterday?) did your teachers ask you questions? Do you think that is because they didn't know the answers? I asked you questions regarding YOUR understanding of evolution. It is called formative assessment, an exercise in assessing what you know and how well you know it. If it was possible to fail formative assessment, you would have done so. You have come up with two terms. One of which you cannot spell and cannot explain, and the other that you have made up. You think that by playing the class clown, that people won't notice just how ignorant you are. It doesn't work, sunshine.
 

Temujin

Well-known member
Ok, here’s your link. Now school yourself 😂😂🤣🤣👍

Come now, you can trust me, you're related to me, remember⁉️⁉️🥸

https://evolution.berkeley.edu › glossary › transitional-forms

Need more help, just ask. I have more jokes to tell and even more myth links to share copy and paste. Whatever it takes

Quote mining, say you? You’re waaay too suspicious. 🤠
Thank you. You asked for examples of transitional forms. Here's a link:
https://evolution.berkeley.edu › glossary › transitional-forms.

This link gives a number of obvious and well - known examples, such as whale and horse evolution. But of course, you knew that because it is the link that you gave me.

Please continue behaving as you are. The practical example of Dunning-Kruger is unparalleled.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Evolutionists are imaginary. There are normal people with mainstream education and scientific understanding. There are normal people with specific and specialised scientific knowledge and understanding. And there are Creationists with no scientific understanding.
or not as the case often is.
 

BMS

Well-known member
Thank you. You asked for examples of transitional forms. Here's a link:
https://evolution.berkeley.edu › glossary › transitional-forms.

This link gives a number of obvious and well - known examples, such as whale and horse evolution. But of course, you knew that because it is the link that you gave me.

Please continue behaving as you are. The practical example of Dunning-Kruger is unparalleled.
We know that. BTW I studied geology at uni so you would be the expert ;) . However since the mule, the product of a horse and a donkey cant reproduce, one might have some doubts how the lineage could have occurred, and certainly kingdom phylum and class.

However, seeing as you are so keen to discuss evolution on a thread about roe v wade..

Define a 'woman' for us
 

BMS

Well-known member
When you were last in school, (yesterday?) did your teachers ask you questions? Do you think that is because they didn't know the answers? I asked you questions regarding YOUR understanding of evolution. It is called formative assessment, an exercise in assessing what you know and how well you know it. If it was possible to fail formative assessment, you would have done so. You have come up with two terms. One of which you cannot spell and cannot explain, and the other that you have made up. You think that by playing the class clown, that people won't notice just how ignorant you are. It doesn't work, sunshine.
do you never ask any questions then? I know you dont answer any, but do you ask any? ;)
 

DaGeo

Active member
Thank you. You asked for examples of transitional forms. Here's a link:
https://evolution.berkeley.edu › glossary › transitional-forms.

This link gives a number of obvious and well - known examples, such as whale and horse evolution. But of course, you knew that because it is the link that you gave me.

Please continue behaving as you are. The practical example of Dunning-Kruger is unparalleled.
Now why do you suppose I gave you that website?
Well, because you’re so sober lately I thought you needed a good 😆 or 🤣 (laugh) or two‼️‼️😂😂😂😊😇
You probably weren’t aware, but scientific inquiry keeps moving on with the influx of new information.
But sooommme theories die hard.
But. Are you sitting down⁉️
The alleged horse series is old “science”, kinda like the Peking Man along with flat earth “science”.
BUT here’s the upside. Neanderthals still roam the earth to this very day. How do I know? Well, because they resurface on the internet from time to time! 😂😂🤣🤣😇😇😇.
I wasn’t GONNA SAY IT😂😂😂🤣👍
Not trying to glory over the hopeful theorists, albeit now disenchanted, nevertheless, some people were never fooled by the transitional horse myth to begin with. There’s more I assure you

But, that’s the down side of science, that is, for soooommme people who get their old ideas crushed in the process. It’s just what happens with the advent of the Information Age

I shouldn’t need to tell you that.
I also shouldn’t have needed to send you a link defining translational forms.

But hey! That’s what good neighbors do when the wheels fall off the neighbor’s wagon er er—theory.
No, not complaining and NOT gonna say I told you so😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣👍😊😆🤩You already know you need a new model——or are ya still hangin’ in there?

Hey yeah‼️‼️ A new model‼️‼️‼️ Or for you at Berkeley, that means “a theory update” 😂😂🤣👍.
 
Last edited:

DaGeo

Active member
When you were last in school, (yesterday?) did your teachers ask you questions? Do you think that is because they didn't know the answers? I asked you questions regarding YOUR understanding of evolution. It is called formative assessment, an exercise in assessing what you know and how well you know it. If it was possible to fail formative assessment, you would have done so. You have come up with two terms. One of which you cannot spell and cannot explain, and the other that you have made up. You think that by playing the class clown, that people won't notice just how ignorant you are. It doesn't work, sunshine.
More adventures into the frivolous AND some after the fact justifications. So long as you’re convinced that’s all that matters

And just how many days did it take you to realize the reason for asking questions⁉️ 😂🤣😇


BTW, did you attend public school and did you believe everything the teacher told you?
 

DaGeo

Active member
Otherwise it's forced birth in a country with the highest maternal mortality rate, no paid maternity leave, no universal, subsidized childcare, no continued birth parent care, and frequently inaccessible mental health care.
Yeah, maybe inaccessible mental health care explains why people kill babies—their not right in the bean
 

Eightcrackers

Well-known member
Evolutionists are imaginary. There are normal people with mainstream education and scientific understanding. There are normal people with specific and specialised scientific knowledge and understanding. And there are Creationists with no scientific understanding.
"Evolutionist" makes as much sense as "gravityist".
 
Top