Gus Bovona
Well-known member
Can I offer a friendly amendment? Ferengi doesn't think that anything is evidence.Don't expect anything soon, ferengi doesn't know what evidence is.
Can I offer a friendly amendment? Ferengi doesn't think that anything is evidence.Don't expect anything soon, ferengi doesn't know what evidence is.
Can I offer a friendly amendment? Ferengi doesn't think that anything is evidence.
Chickens evolved from ancestors that had teeth, but chickens did not need them and lost the ability to make them, despite retaining the information to make them.They never evolved teeth.
De-evolved from the 171 types of Gallaformes`that exited the Ark after the flood.Chickens evolved from ancestors that had teeth, but chickens did not need them and lost the ability to make them, despite retaining the information to make them.
How big was that Ark to include 171 pairs of Galliformes along with pairs of other living things?De-evolved from the 171 types of Gallaformes`that exited the Ark after the flood.
Look it up in Genesis...the dimensions are given there.How big was that Ark to include 171 pairs of Galliformes along with pairs of other living things?
You prove my pointYou can't even specify which claim you were talking about.
Information is copied from the environment into DNA by random mutation and natural selectionDon't expect anything soon, ferengi doesn't know what evidence is.
Where is your evidence or logic to demonstrate that?You prove my point
Prove your own claims first hypocrite. And stop avoiding the OP.Where is your evidence or logic to demonstrate that?
Which claim?Prove your own claims first hypocrite. And stop avoiding the OP.
Stop shifting the burden. Prove your own claims first hypocrite. And stop avoiding the OP.Which claim?
I have, in post #30. You have not refuted my proof, so it stands.Information is copied from the environment into DNA by random mutation and natural selection
PROVE THE CLAIMS
Unsupported assertions.I have, in post #30.
Shifting the burdenYou have not refuted my proof, so it stands.
BTW, I missed something earlier, you might appreciate it:I have, in post #30. You have not refuted my proof, so it stands.
It's intellectually dishonest to ask for a proof, receive a syllogism as a reply, and to then claim that no proof has been offered without identifying where the syllogism is wrong, irrelevant, or whatever - without supporting the claim that no proof has been offered. . . .
However, once the claimant has provided what they say is proof of their proof, won't they have the burden to prove that they proved that they provided proof?No need to- the claimant has the burden to prove they provided proof.
Address the OP. Prove your claims.BTW, I missed something earlier, you might appreciate it:
Why am I under an obligation to address the OP?Address the OP. Prove your claims.
Address the OP. Prove your claims.Why am I under an obligation to address the OP?
Non-responsive, your honor.Address the OP. Prove your claims.
Address the OP. Prove your claims.Non-responsive, your honor.