CrowCross
Well-known member
They never evolved teeth.Why would chickens waste resources making teeth they do not need? Loss of teeth is an advantage.
They never evolved teeth.Why would chickens waste resources making teeth they do not need? Loss of teeth is an advantage.
PROVE YOUR CLAIMSrossum said: Information is copied from the environment into DNA by random mutation and natural selection
Its even more dishonest to shift the burden of proof since syllogisms are not scientific proofIt's intellectually dishonest to ask for a proof, receive a syllogism as a reply, and to then claim that no proof has been offered without identifying where the syllogism is wrong, irrelevant, or whatever
No need to- the claimant has the burden to prove they provided proof.- without supporting the claim that no proof has been offered.
Unsupported assertions are not logic or proof. You making an unsupported scientific claim then dishonestly equivocating to nonsensical logical claims is not proof or science or honest.I provided a proof in formal logic.
They did. There is a saying "As rare as hens teeth". Sometimes, rarely, the genes for teeth in a hen are activated. Just as sometimes humans are born with a short tail -- we still have the genes for a tail, just as our early primate ancestors did.They never evolved teeth.
They did. There is a saying "As rare as hens teeth". Sometimes, rarely, the genes for teeth in a hen are activated. Just as sometimes humans are born with a short tail -- we still have the genes for a tail, just as our early primate ancestors did.
Evolution can explain this. Creationism cannot.
I already have proved my claim with my syllogism upthread. You have not refuted my syllogism so, as things stand, I have proved my claim.rossum said: Information is copied from the environment into DNA by random mutation and natural selection
PROVE YOUR CLAIMS
LOL- NOT - You dont prove scientific claims with logic and syllogisms are not proofs.I already have proved my claim with my syllogism upthread.
You asked for proof. I provided proof. My proof stands until you refute it.You dont prove scientific claims with logic and syllogisms are not proofs.
FALSE - againYou asked for proof. I provided proof.
A scientific conclusion and the evidence that leads to that conclusion can be presented in a syllogism:. . . syllogisms are not scientific proof
False - the premises are listed - not evidence.A scientific conclusion and the evidence that leads to that conclusion can be presented in a syllogism:
A premise can be evidence.False - the premises are listed - not evidence.
Already done in post #30 above.PROVE YOUR CLAIMS
Creationism is founded on the denial of reality. What a great creationist ferengi is! No one can deny reality so doggedly!Already done in post #30 above.
Where is your refutation of my proof?
How can creationism deny reality when reality is creation?Creationism is founded on the denial of reality. What a great creationist ferengi is! No one can deny reality so doggedly!
Oh boy, what next?They did. There is a saying "As rare as hens teeth". Sometimes, rarely, the genes for teeth in a hen are activated. Just as sometimes humans are born with a short tail -- we still have the genes for a tail, just as our early primate ancestors did.
Evolution can explain this. Creationism cannot.
So, from now on don't complain that we don't show you evidence. We do, it is just that you ignore it.Talk origins....no thanks.