As I said, one ad hominem warrants another:No it is not. See the OP where I summarized his arguments.
It was you saying you'd discuss this without ad hominems. But it turns out you had no intention of refraining from ad hominems.
Proverbs 26:4 "Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes."
The word "cruel" or "cruelty" as alleged against Christians appear no less than 4 times in your own summary. Obviously you're into ad hominen just as much as he himself was.An absurd list of strawmen. It is not an ad hominem attack on Christians to criticize Christianity. If you can't handle a critique then you shouldn't have asked for one.
Where? Quote him calling you cruel.
Try looking it up in the dictionary.He said "logically anterior" which has nothing to do with time.