Russia loses entire attack squadron of four aircraft

Reepicheep

Well-known member
I've done some research into how Ukraine managed to down two Russian jets and two helicopters within a 30 second period (the Russians, of course, are claiming that all four aircraft were downed as a result of careless smoking by Russian aircrews, just as they claim the 30 Russain naval vessels that have been sunk were destroyed as a result of careless smoking by Russian sailors). Ukraine is keeping silent on the incident, although it appears the following is most likely what happened.

Since very early in the war, Russia has avoided sending aircraft over Ukraine, since those pesky Ukrainians have a habit of using surface to air missiles to shoot down any Russian aircraft that venture into Ukraine airspace. The new Russian strategy is to send a jet armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs towards the Russian/Ukrainian border and have the jet launch the missiles/bombs while the plane is still deep in Russian territory. This makes it impossible for Ukraine to shoot down the jets.

The attack in question seems typical of recent Russian attacks, and was intended to unfold as follows: a Russian SU-34 fighter bomber armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs approaches the Russian/Ukrainian border, with the intention of launching the ordinance while still deep in Russian territory. The fighter bomber was accompanied by a SU-35 fighter, whose mission is to engage any Ukrainian aircraft that may appear. Two MI-8 helicopters were also present, and their duel role was to jam Ukrainian radar and to pick up the Russian pilots if either or both planes were shot down.

The Ukrainians have two anti-aircraft systems which are capable of shooting down Russian aircraft, the American supplied Patriot system and Soviet era S-300 system. Since Ukraine has promised not to use the Patriot system to shoot down planes over Russia, the following is most likely what happened:

A few days before the Russian planes were downed, the Ukrainians secretly moved a S-300 battery to the Ukraine/Russia border. The battery was well hidden and kept turned off so that the Russians couldn't detect it. Over the course of several days, the S-300 crew monitored Russian attacks until the Ukrainian soldiers manning the battery understood how the Russians operated. On the day the planes were shot down, the Ukrainians monitored the approaching Russian aircraft until the planes were within range. The Ukrainians then turned on the "active radar" of the S-300 battery, locked onto the four aircraft within seconds, and then launched a wave of missiles. Since turning on the active radar would reveal the location of the hidden battery, the Ukrainians immediately packed up and moved. The wave of anti-aircraft missiles successfully downed all four Russian craft, which were 15 or so kilometers deep in Russian territory.

Ukrainian anti-missile systems have also been very successful recently in shooting down Russian missiles. It appears we have reached a turning point in the air war, with Ukraine holding a significant advantage.
 
Are you saying the Russians did not build in the ability in their current airforce to defend against their own
S300 system?

Really?
 
I've done some research into how Ukraine managed to down two Russian jets and two helicopters within a 30 second period (the Russians, of course, are claiming that all four aircraft were downed as a result of careless smoking by Russian aircrews, just as they claim the 30 Russain naval vessels that have been sunk were destroyed as a result of careless smoking by Russian sailors). Ukraine is keeping silent on the incident, although it appears the following is most likely what happened.

Since very early in the war, Russia has avoided sending aircraft over Ukraine, since those pesky Ukrainians have a habit of using surface to air missiles to shoot down any Russian aircraft that venture into Ukraine airspace. The new Russian strategy is to send a jet armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs towards the Russian/Ukrainian border and have the jet launch the missiles/bombs while the plane is still deep in Russian territory. This makes it impossible for Ukraine to shoot down the jets.

The attack in question seems typical of recent Russian attacks, and was intended to unfold as follows: a Russian SU-34 fighter bomber armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs approaches the Russian/Ukrainian border, with the intention of launching the ordinance while still deep in Russian territory. The fighter bomber was accompanied by a SU-35 fighter, whose mission is to engage any Ukrainian aircraft that may appear. Two MI-8 helicopters were also present, and their duel role was to jam Ukrainian radar and to pick up the Russian pilots if either or both planes were shot down.

The Ukrainians have two anti-aircraft systems which are capable of shooting down Russian aircraft, the American supplied Patriot system and Soviet era S-300 system. Since Ukraine has promised not to use the Patriot system to shoot down planes over Russia, the following is most likely what happened:

A few days before the Russian planes were downed, the Ukrainians secretly moved a S-300 battery to the Ukraine/Russia border. The battery was well hidden and kept turned off so that the Russians couldn't detect it. Over the course of several days, the S-300 crew monitored Russian attacks until the Ukrainian soldiers manning the battery understood how the Russians operated. On the day the planes were shot down, the Ukrainians monitored the approaching Russian aircraft until the planes were within range. The Ukrainians then turned on the "active radar" of the S-300 battery, locked onto the four aircraft within seconds, and then launched a wave of missiles. Since turning on the active radar would reveal the location of the hidden battery, the Ukrainians immediately packed up and moved. The wave of anti-aircraft missiles successfully downed all four Russian craft, which were 15 or so kilometers deep in Russian territory.

Ukrainian anti-missile systems have also been very successful recently in shooting down Russian missiles. It appears we have reached a turning point in the air war, with Ukraine holding a significant advantage.

The British believe that Russians have a faulty identify friend or foe system (IFF system).

Source:


They literally shot their own aircraft.

_________
.
 
Last edited:
I've done some research into how Ukraine managed to down two Russian jets and two helicopters within a 30 second period (the Russians, of course, are claiming that all four aircraft were downed as a result of careless smoking by Russian aircrews, just as they claim the 30 Russain naval vessels that have been sunk were destroyed as a result of careless smoking by Russian sailors). Ukraine is keeping silent on the incident, although it appears the following is most likely what happened.

Since very early in the war, Russia has avoided sending aircraft over Ukraine, since those pesky Ukrainians have a habit of using surface to air missiles to shoot down any Russian aircraft that venture into Ukraine airspace. The new Russian strategy is to send a jet armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs towards the Russian/Ukrainian border and have the jet launch the missiles/bombs while the plane is still deep in Russian territory. This makes it impossible for Ukraine to shoot down the jets.

The attack in question seems typical of recent Russian attacks, and was intended to unfold as follows: a Russian SU-34 fighter bomber armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs approaches the Russian/Ukrainian border, with the intention of launching the ordinance while still deep in Russian territory. The fighter bomber was accompanied by a SU-35 fighter, whose mission is to engage any Ukrainian aircraft that may appear. Two MI-8 helicopters were also present, and their duel role was to jam Ukrainian radar and to pick up the Russian pilots if either or both planes were shot down.

The Ukrainians have two anti-aircraft systems which are capable of shooting down Russian aircraft, the American supplied Patriot system and Soviet era S-300 system. Since Ukraine has promised not to use the Patriot system to shoot down planes over Russia, the following is most likely what happened:

A few days before the Russian planes were downed, the Ukrainians secretly moved a S-300 battery to the Ukraine/Russia border. The battery was well hidden and kept turned off so that the Russians couldn't detect it. Over the course of several days, the S-300 crew monitored Russian attacks until the Ukrainian soldiers manning the battery understood how the Russians operated. On the day the planes were shot down, the Ukrainians monitored the approaching Russian aircraft until the planes were within range. The Ukrainians then turned on the "active radar" of the S-300 battery, locked onto the four aircraft within seconds, and then launched a wave of missiles. Since turning on the active radar would reveal the location of the hidden battery, the Ukrainians immediately packed up and moved. The wave of anti-aircraft missiles successfully downed all four Russian craft, which were 15 or so kilometers deep in Russian territory.

Ukrainian anti-missile systems have also been very successful recently in shooting down Russian missiles. It appears we have reached a turning point in the air war, with Ukraine holding a significant advantage.
The first four words puts yoyr story in the trash can, you suffer from TDS 10th stage, go see a doctor
 
I've done some research into how Ukraine managed to down two Russian jets and two helicopters within a 30 second period (the Russians, of course, are claiming that all four aircraft were downed as a result of careless smoking by Russian aircrews, just as they claim the 30 Russain naval vessels that have been sunk were destroyed as a result of careless smoking by Russian sailors). Ukraine is keeping silent on the incident, although it appears the following is most likely what happened.

Since very early in the war, Russia has avoided sending aircraft over Ukraine, since those pesky Ukrainians have a habit of using surface to air missiles to shoot down any Russian aircraft that venture into Ukraine airspace. The new Russian strategy is to send a jet armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs towards the Russian/Ukrainian border and have the jet launch the missiles/bombs while the plane is still deep in Russian territory. This makes it impossible for Ukraine to shoot down the jets.

The attack in question seems typical of recent Russian attacks, and was intended to unfold as follows: a Russian SU-34 fighter bomber armed with cruise missiles and/or gliding bombs approaches the Russian/Ukrainian border, with the intention of launching the ordinance while still deep in Russian territory. The fighter bomber was accompanied by a SU-35 fighter, whose mission is to engage any Ukrainian aircraft that may appear. Two MI-8 helicopters were also present, and their duel role was to jam Ukrainian radar and to pick up the Russian pilots if either or both planes were shot down.

The Ukrainians have two anti-aircraft systems which are capable of shooting down Russian aircraft, the American supplied Patriot system and Soviet era S-300 system. Since Ukraine has promised not to use the Patriot system to shoot down planes over Russia, the following is most likely what happened:

A few days before the Russian planes were downed, the Ukrainians secretly moved a S-300 battery to the Ukraine/Russia border. The battery was well hidden and kept turned off so that the Russians couldn't detect it. Over the course of several days, the S-300 crew monitored Russian attacks until the Ukrainian soldiers manning the battery understood how the Russians operated. On the day the planes were shot down, the Ukrainians monitored the approaching Russian aircraft until the planes were within range. The Ukrainians then turned on the "active radar" of the S-300 battery, locked onto the four aircraft within seconds, and then launched a wave of missiles. Since turning on the active radar would reveal the location of the hidden battery, the Ukrainians immediately packed up and moved. The wave of anti-aircraft missiles successfully downed all four Russian craft, which were 15 or so kilometers deep in Russian territory.

Ukrainian anti-missile systems have also been very successful recently in shooting down Russian missiles. It appears we have reached a turning point in the air war, with Ukraine holding a significant advantage.
Fascinating if true. Thanks.
 
Other news from Ukraine.

The Russian Navy is launching a salvo of Kalibr cruise missiles from ships in the Black Sea against Ukraine. Dozens of missiles are heading toward Kiev. . . .

This story is happening now (5:42 PM EDT) check back for updates. . ......May 16th.
 
The British believe that Russians have a faulty identify friend or foe system

They literally shot their own aircraft.

As difficult as it is to believe, you could very well be correct. It is possible and perhaps likely that Russia shot down four and perhaps five of their own aircraft!

Ukraine hasn't taken credit for the downing of the five aircraft (a 5th Russian aircraft was shot down on the same day in an unrelated incident). Wagner founder Prigozhin says that he believes Russia shot down their own aircraft. The Russian government has remained silent on the incident.

Neither scenario (Russia shooting down their own planes, or Ukraine destroying the planes using missiles launched from over 45 kilometers away) makes Russia look very good.

The following article gives a good summary of the various possibilities, including additional scenarios such as an attack carried out by Ukrainian planes, and deliberate sabotage by Russian troops.

(ASIDE: the article states that the 5th aircraft shot down, a rescue helicopter, was sent to check if there were any survivors from the first four aircraft; this means that the fifth aircraft was downed as part of the same incident, and not in an unrelated incident as I claimed earlier in this post).

Downed aircraft over Russia’s Bryansk region: who’s responsible?
 
Other news from Ukraine.

The Russian Navy is launching a salvo of Kalibr cruise missiles from ships in the Black Sea against Ukraine. Dozens of missiles are heading toward Kiev. . . .

This story is happening now (5:42 PM EDT) check back for updates. . ......May 16th.

Ukraine says a total of 27 missiles and drones were fired overnight by the Russians, and that Ukraine successfully shot down all 27. There are reports that one of the American supplied Patriot systems was damaged in the attack. The estimated cost of these missiles and drones was $120 million, so not a very good return on investment for the Russians.

Night attack on Ukraine cost Russia at least US$120 million
 
Ukraine says a total of 27 missiles and drones were fired overnight by the Russians, and that Ukraine successfully shot down all 27. There are reports that one of the American supplied Patriot systems was damaged in the attack. The estimated cost of these missiles and drones was $120 million, so not a very good return on investment for the Russians.

Night attack on Ukraine cost Russia at least US$120 million
Perhaps, but I doubt it. If one of the patriot systems was damaged...they were not 27 for 27.

I believe very little as presented by each side of the conflict.
 
As difficult as it is to believe, you could very well be correct. It is possible and perhaps likely that Russia shot down four and perhaps five of their own aircraft!

Ukraine hasn't taken credit for the downing of the five aircraft (a 5th Russian aircraft was shot down on the same day in an unrelated incident). Wagner founder Prigozhin says that he believes Russia shot down their own aircraft. The Russian government has remained silent on the incident.

Neither scenario (Russia shooting down their own planes, or Ukraine destroying the planes using missiles launched from over 45 kilometers away) makes Russia look very good.

The following article gives a good summary of the various possibilities, including additional scenarios such as an attack carried out by Ukrainian planes, and deliberate sabotage by Russian troops.

(ASIDE: the article states that the 5th aircraft shot down, a rescue helicopter, was sent to check if there were any survivors from the first four aircraft; this means that the fifth aircraft was downed as part of the same incident, and not in an unrelated incident as I claimed earlier in this post).

Downed aircraft over Russia’s Bryansk region: who’s responsible?

Russians are becoming so frustrated by their losses day-in, and day-out, that the CIA is actively recruiting them.


Open for business and we have deep pockets ($$$)

_______
.
 
Other news from Ukraine.

The Russian Navy is launching a salvo of Kalibr cruise missiles from ships in the Black Sea against Ukraine. Dozens of missiles are heading toward Kiev. . . .

This story is happening now (5:42 PM EDT) check back for updates. . ......May 16th.

One can expect an accelerated increase in intensity and frequency in the months ahead. It's my hope that this does not turn into another North vs. South Korea continuous "special military operation".

__________
.
 
Perhaps, but I doubt it. If one of the patriot systems was damaged...they were not 27 for 27.

I believe very little as presented by each side of the conflict.

United States technicians arrived in Kyiv and reported minimal damage to the MIM-104 Patriot system and it remains fully operational.

Source

Reuters also reports that the unstoppable next-generation Russian "Kinzhal" hypersonic missiles were shot down.

________
.
 
Last edited:
United States technicians arrived in Kyiv and reported minimal damage to the MIM-104 Patriot system and it remains fully operational.

Source

Reuters also reports that the unstoppable next-generation Russian "Kinzhal" hypersonic missiles were shot down.

________
.
I'm sure that Russia has found this whole exercise very valuable in that it has given a real world assessment of its military capabilities on equipment, leadership, systems, training and morale. Certainly the rest of the world has learnt a lot.
 
I'm sure that Russia has found this whole exercise very valuable in that it has given a real world assessment of its military capabilities on equipment, leadership, systems, training and morale. Certainly the rest of the world has learnt a lot.

I currently have reason to believe that the results of Ukraine's fight for independence, freedom, and integration into the European Union are a critical test concerning future Russian / Chinese / and Iranian economic and military power. Even Africa's resource-rich continent is on the proverbial table.

If Ukraine's fight fails, the European Union, NATO, the United Kingdom, and the United States will appear weaker - emboldening others to attempt and potentially create a new world dominance.

Simply letting Putin have his way as some advocate will initiate a heavy cost that may not be easily be ignored at a later date.

________
.
 
Last edited:
I currently have reason to believe that the results of Ukraine's fight for independence, freedom, and integration into the European Union are a critical test concerning future Russian / Chinese / and Iranian economic and military power in the future. Even Africa's resource-rich continent is on the proverbial table.

If Ukraine's fight fails, the European Union, NATO, the United Kingdom, and the United States will appear weaker - emboldening others to create a new world dominance.

________
.
That's true up to a point. However, I would argue that Russia has already been severely weakened. The reputational damage has been colossal and is probably irreparable in the short or medium term i.e. with Putin in charge. If Ukraine eventually falls, the main beneficiary will be China. The longer things go on, the more China gains at Russian expense. That's why China will seek to ensure that Russia wins, or at least doesn't lose, but not too quickly.
 
That's true up to a point. However, I would argue that Russia has already been severely weakened. The reputational damage has been colossal and is probably irreparable in the short or medium term i.e. with Putin in charge. If Ukraine eventually falls, the main beneficiary will be China. The longer things go on, the more China gains at Russian expense. That's why China will seek to ensure that Russia wins, or at least doesn't lose, but not too quickly.

Ah..yes. A weakened Russia may provide an opportunity for China to reacquire older territory and bolster its currency. I recall reading about this potential outcome a few weeks ago.

I'm nearly half-way through "Putin's Playbook" written by an ex-soviet CIA analyst. Portions of her book are redacted, but it still reveals the Russian attitude concerning its local and global ambitions.

________
.
 
I would argue that Russia has already been severely weakened.
Last night, one of the talking heads on a PBS news show (I can't remember which show) said that spending 5% of the US defence budget on Ukraine has resulted in the destruction of 50% of the Russian army. No American lives (except for volunteers) have been put at risk, so all in all giving military aid to Ukraine has been very successful.
 
Back
Top