Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Peer review. Mutual adoration societies.If it agrees with you then it is reputable.
Peer review. Mutual adoration societies.If it agrees with you then it is reputable.
That is your opinion.This was a factual story about Ukraine taking over a city formerly held by Russia.
This was not an opinion piece that could be subject to disagreement.
This was all over the news.
Facts are facts.
Just hours after the Post report, which turned out to be entirely true and accurate, other media sources began circulating a letter allegedly signed by 51 intelligence officials, both current and retired, allegedly from both parties, who called the Hunter Biden laptop and the information contained therein a sophisticated Russia disinformation campaign.
Looks like you're the one attempting to change the subject.Trying to change the subject
I was addressing of what your definition of what is a reliable source .The subject is the withdrawal of Russian troops from Lyman in Ukraine, a fact reported by the NYT that you seem to have problems accepting, although all news sources have reported it, even Fox!
Ukraine war: Russia withdraws troops from Lyman, strategic town in region Putin annexed
Ukraine's Armed Forces said it had encircled as many as 5,500 Russian troops near the town of Lyman in the Donetsk region.www.foxnews.com
He is kind of stuck.That has to be embarassing, having to pull out of a region you just one day earlier declared was now annexed into being part of your country. Putin just keeps embarrassing himself with this idiotic invasion.
In this case the NYT reported on the facts about the Ukrainian takeover of Lyman. None of those facts are in dispute.I was addressing of what your definition of what is a reliable source .
NYT is a very reliable source of Fake News. They killed a story reporting on The Harvey Weinstein several times. Sexual predator privilege.I was addressing of what your definition of what is a reliable source .
“Fake news” is just a troll. No one so stupid as to really believe Hateway Pundit is a reputable source and the New York Times is just propaganda could possibly be able to type words.Really, and I bet you can provide solid examples of the NYT printing misinformation?
It amuses me that the people who cry about fake news are the ones who so often fall for it.
I also wonder if the newly minted, yet fake Russian citizens
will be used as conscripts to fight against their brothers, sisters, and close relatives in the current and ongoing Ukrainian counteroffensive.
__
I wish the NYT would report that oxygen is required for human life... how many RWers would stop breathing the instant they read it...In this case the NYT reported on the facts about the Ukrainian takeover of Lyman. None of those facts are in dispute.
If you want to change the subject to how to identify a reliable source, you can start a new thread.
Turns out the citizens of Lyman did not have internet or electricity, so they had not heard the news that their city had been annexed by Russia, making them Russian citizens.Fake according to whom?
The NYT just reported that the 2022 Nobel in physiology and medicine went to Svante Paabo for his work on sequencing Neandertal DNA and on human evolution. Sure to cause many RW heads to explode, who will also deny the accuracy of the story.I wish the NYT would report that oxygen is required for human life... how many RWers would stop breathing the instant they read it...
Fake news and a failed argument from authority fallacy does not prove evo.The NYT just reported that the 2022 Nobel in physiology and medicine went to Svante Paabo for his work on sequencing Neandertal DNA and on human evolution.
Fake according to whom?
Good news for whom? Ukrainian forces have suffered massive causalities to support Washington's demand for an offensive at all cost.This is from the NYT. Am not posting a link since it is behind a paywall, however, this news should be available elsewhere.
Good news. Hope the Ukrainians can keep this up.
I wonder if the Russian public is being informed of this.
Soldiers and commanders interviewed in the past week portrayed the battlefield losses as ‘high’ and ‘massive’ . . .They describe large offensives in which columns of Ukrainian tanks and armored vehicles tried to cross open fields only to be pounded mercilessly by Russian artillery and blown up by Russian mines . . . during a recent assault we lost 50 guys in two hours. In another place . . . hundreds of Ukrainian troops were killed or wounded while trying to take a single village which is still in Russian hands . . .
There should be little doubt what Putin will do:The ball is in Putin's court. He claimed that these regions were Russian forever, and that attacks on them would be regarded as attacks on Russia. He implied that he would respond with nuclear weapons.
I cannot imagine he would do anything so foolish, but dangerous men do foolish things when backed into a corner.
We will defend our land with all the forces and resources we have, and we will do everything we can to ensure the safety of our people.–Vladimir Putin from the annexation speech
Yet he ran away a day after annexing this regionThere should be little doubt what Putin will do:
You are off topic. Your NyT Fake news coverage.The NYT just reported that the 2022 Nobel in physiology and medicine went to Svante Paabo for his work on sequencing Neandertal DNA and on human evolution. Sure to cause many RW heads to explode, who will also deny the accuracy of the story.
So your klowns pretend God was wrong?I started a thread in the Evolution forum with links and details
Russian military strategy is to withdraw when necessary to preserve their fighting force. In contrast, western armies tend to try to hold territory at all cost, even if that strategy results in the destruction of their armies.Yet he ran away a day after annexing this region