You are presenting a big logical fallacy above, and expecting us to believe a fallacious argument called "argument from silence".
As has been explained to you several times by me (and perhaps others), "The ONLY thing that silence proves is silence on that particular issue. Yet, you are pushing one more logical fallacy, both of which invalidate your efforts to make a point. The repetitive posting of unanswered questions will not cause them to be answered because that is just another form of "magical thinking".
It is my opinion that the reason no one answers your questions is because they see the inherent trap in each of them.
Then, this clip of your own words reveals much about your position:
You must see by now that the Evangelical position, especially in the NT is exegetically based, but the positions your SDA friends take is opinion based. Here is the difference in the approaches
The SDA position is opinion based, meaning that Ellen, or other SDA higher ups believe that these disconnected verses when strung together teach certain SDA doctrines so they are presented as truth.
On the other hand, the Evangelicals believe in the plenary inspiration of Scripture that the words used, their context, meaning, grammar and syntax are all equally and divinely inspired. Taken as a whole they present a context that is never changing, and plainly point to a singular interpretation. On those building blocks we build our doctrinal foundation.
Here is the proof that you place yourself as an authority for SDA things, and in the process run down others not believing as you do:
Really, Icy? You have that high of an opinion about your beliefs?
I guess you really believe that because you condesendingly posted:
Do you use a crystal ball or anything similar to project your imagined mind reading ability onto other posters as you claimed above?