Except that it isn't fact. You are not qualified ( nor am I) to determine facts about biology, which it turns out, just like physics, is not always common sense or easily understood by lay people.
Seriously dude? Now really--I mean SERIOUSLY DUDE?
Let me get this straight: I need to be a biologist to know the difference between a male and a female? I need to be some kind of expert either in medical science or biology, or both, to know the difference. You know what it is interesting? The common, uneducated, uncool, unhip, unenlightened masses for 2000 years have been able to tell the difference without this new fangled "Science" of yours. Now you want to suggest that I need to be a biologist or have a PhD in medical science to know the difference between a male and a female. Outside of that, I offer nothing but "opinion." Sir, there is male and there is female. This is NOT "opinion" this is FACT. Just becasue a bunch of experts and all the cool kids have been fooled into believing differently, does not change anything.
I am sure why you can understand----I am not buying what you are selling.
You have an uninformed opinion, which those who are informed, disagree with.
Yeah--"uninformed." I need to be a biologist or a medical doctor to know what male and female is. Outside of that, I just have an "opinion."
Sir, just so you know--this is why there are people who are "anti-science." When scientists try to fool people--and when they do not buy what they are selling---attempt to insult them as being too stupid to understand--that is why some are anti-science. I am actually pro-science, but I do not believing in using it as a weapon to deny reality.
Your opinion is fine for every day interactions but is dangerously wrong when you inter the realm of intersec, transgender and related issues.
For heaven's sake, sir. I do not need to be an expert in biology or medical science to know that there are two sexes and only two sexes. I do not care how the experts want to bully me. 10 PhD's in biology cannot change the truth sir.
What utter nonsense. You claim that your subjective and uninformed opinion is not backed by science because science is influenced by other people's informed opinions. Well duh! Politics and religion have no place in biology. They do hay a place in dealing with the consequences of biology, in caring for those affected and dealing with the prejudices of the uninformed such as yourself
The problem, sir, is that just like us superstitious, uneducated, uncool, unhip, superstitious religious cannot separate out politics and religion, scientists can't do it either.
More garbage. Science is cutthroat competitive. Every scientist wants to break the consensus and overturn the status quo.
Sure they do--but not on controversial issues.
Any scientist falsifying results for financial gain would lose all credibility. As would any scientist pandering to the political needs of the uninformed, such as yourself.
Sir, you do not have to "falsify results" in order to give people the results they want. You can make the data say whatever you want.
Of course not. If it goes against what you believe is common sense, you reject it in the belief that your uninformed opinion is more reliable than the informed opinions of experts. You trumpet this arrogant lunacy as if it was a virtue.
It is not arrogant to say "There are two sexes and only two sexes" sir. That is fact, not opinion.
"I don't know anything about art, but I know what I like." is the cliche phrase of an arrogant philistine. What makes you think that " I don't know anything about science, but I know what is true." is any less pathetic?
But I am not arguing that.
Um, that would be reality.