King Charisma
Member
Science alters its views to preserve its observations. Christianity alters its observations to preserve its views.
You should bring this to the attention of those scientists who are Christians.Science alters its views to preserve its observations. Christianity alters its observations to preserve its views.
What would be interesting would be to compare the differences between the reasons they believe the things of science true and the reasons they believe Christianity true.You should bring this to the attention of those scientists who are Christians.
In many instances Christianity has a head start on what happened....and doesn't need the T.o.E. to show how we got here.Science alters its views to preserve its observations. Christianity alters its observations to preserve its views.
Well, that's pretty simple.....the Bible say there was a city here or there.....and they go look and find a foundation.What would be interesting would be to compare the differences between the reasons they believe the things of science true and the reasons they believe Christianity true.
What counts are the reasons behind why you think something true. Science has a far superior methodology than Christianity when it comes to things like T.o.E.In many instances Christianity has a head start on what happened....and doesn't need the T.o.E. to show how we got here.
But that example is not getting to whether Christianity is true.Well, that's pretty simple.....the Bible say there was a city here or there.....and they go look and find a foundation.
As I said, what counts are the reasons behind why you think something true. The reasons behind why you think there was a worldwide flood are not very scientific compared to the reasons the majority of scientists think there wasn't such a flood.The Bible says there was a world wide flood...along with other non-biblical flood literature and scientist find evidence that shows of a world wide deluge that covered the planet, laid down strata and buried things.
.....and the atheist want to cry foul????
Apples to oranges fallacy.Science alters its views to preserve its observations. Christianity alters its observations to preserve its views.
You should bring this to the attention of those scientists who are Christians.
Christians who are scientists observe methodological naturalism and generally don't waste their time thumping their bibles at atheists.You should bring this to the attention of those scientists who are Christians.
Because you can't ?No need for me to elaborate. ?
Spiderman takes place in a city called New York. The existence of New York City proves that Spiderman is true. Just using your logic.Well, that's pretty simple.....the Bible say there was a city here or there.....and they go look and find a foundation.
There's no need -- apples to oranges ?Because you can't ?
Actually it's apples to apples. They both purport to make statements about the natural world. You can't elaborate because you're just making feeble excuses.There's no need -- apples to oranges ?
Spiderman is a fictional character. Just citing the truth.Spiderman takes place in a city called New York. The existence of New York City proves that Spiderman is true. Just using your logic.
God is a fictional character. Just citing the truth.Spiderman is a fictional character. Just citing the truth.
No, it's not.Actually it's apples to apples.
Sience is learned through observation; Christinaity is learned through revelation -- apples to oranges.They both purport to make statements about the natural world.
See above ?You can't elaborate because you're just making feeble excuses.
Jesus isn't. Just citing the truth.God is a fictional character. Just citing the truth.
Yes it is. Apples to apples.No, it's not.
If revelation were a valid way of learning then it would have valid things to say about reality, which it does not.Sience is learned through observation; Christinaity is learned through revelation -- apples to oranges.
Jesus is a fictional character. Just citing the truth.Jesus isn't. Just citing the truth.