So you FEEL threads are evidence of your evo religious?
Why do you run from the information question?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
She did it again - ross claims "Random mutations generate new information"
- Thread starter ferengi
- Start date
Why do you run from the information question?
I do not. I started three threads on exactly that. Threads you like to pretend do not exist because they soundly trashed the ID position.Why do you run from the information question?
- Can Evolution Create Information (part 1)?
I started a thread "On Measuring Information" about how IDists measure information, and I now want to look at how that can be applied to evolution. IDists offered two quite different ways to measure information. I will look at the other another time. Here is the first: One way is to measure...
forums.carm.org
- On Measuring Information
We often talk about information on this forum. I have never been that clear on how IDists actually measure this quantity, despite it being a big part of their arguments. I mean, look how often ferengi enquiries about information? Ten times a day? They seem very sure evolution cannot create...
forums.carm.org
The DI's Information Argument
The Discovery Institute (DI) claim evolution cannot create information. It is a claim that comes up a lot, so I thought it worth while exploring their take on it in depth. https://www.discovery.org/a/118/ They divide evolution into two parts... To see that natural causes cannot account for CSI...
forums.carm.org
So you are still running - threads are not evidence - try againI do not. I started three threads on exactly that.
Those threads are evidence that IDists get beat time and time again on this issue.So you are still running - threads are not evidence - try again
And this thread is evidence that when they do, they run off, then two days later they delude themselves it never happened, and come right back and start a new thread on the exact same topic.
You got beat on this topic all those other threads. You are presenting nothing new here. What exactly are you trying to do ferengi? Do you think your inane posts make creationism/ID look persuasive to anyone? Anyone visiting this forum who is undecided can see at a glance that all you have is evasion and a bunch of stock phrases you recycle ad nauseum. Meanwhile, evolutionists have real science in real, peer-reviewed journals.
Every time you bring this up you loose, so why keep doing it?
Where is YOUR evidence I am wrong?So you are still running - threads are not evidence - try again
Why do you feel your pet theory is excused from having to be supported? Is it not a little hypocritical to constantly demand evidence from us, but never provide any yourself? How do you rationalise that to yourself, ferengi? Or do you just ignore it and pretend it is your opponent who is the hypocrite?
Your unsupported assertions are not evidence.Those threads are evidence that IDists get beat time and time again on this issue.
Nope - sorry - I am not an atheoevolib- I THINK.Why do you feel
Of course not. But those threads where ID arguments got soundly beaten certainly are.Your unsupported assertions are not evidence.
No need to apologise, I think it is a good sign that you are not sure of your position.Nope - sorry - I am not an atheoevolib- I THINK.
So you admit you have no evidence for evo - but believe by faith.Of course not.
Prove evo creates functional biological information.