But everyone on your side of the ideological divide said its different, and now you are saying it can be the same.
Completely and obviously false. Nobody has said they must be different; everybody knows they can be the same. For the vast majority of people, they are the same.
I know what the deception is, I am just using your own words to expose the deception.
The only thing you're exposing is that you don't even understand the issue.
So for example a the word 'transsexual' better describes a man who lives their lives as best they can as woman because they have a dysphoria with their sex.
A transsexual person is a transgender person. I know you hate the dictionary, but it's already proven you wrong on this.
And you've already been shown to be wrong about gender dysphoria, too.
In gender identity ideology a 'transwoman' is a word used to make out a man is a woman when of course they aren't. and 'gender identity' tries to say they are a woman.
A transwoman is a person whose biological sex is male and whose gender is female. Just like the transsexuals you admit exist.
Woman is the biological sex, using the word 'transwoman' doesn't change that, and
Nobody disputes this.
transwoman is not the correct term to refer to the sex, transsexual is.
The dictionary has already shown you to be wrong.
this makes no sense. What you mean is gender is how the person feels about themselves (regardless of whether its reality) which includes among other imaginations, where they dont acknowledge the biological sex they are.
What I mean is what I said, not your caricature of it.
proven as above. If you want to disagree then address what I wrote rather than a baseless denial.
You've not proven anything.
HIS sex. Its a man remember. So yes it does deny his sex, and the point made was the events are segregated by biological sex, so that no longer exists.
HER sex. Biologically male, gender female. It does not deny his sex, nor can you show that it does.
Events are separated by gender, not biological sex. If they were not, transwomen would not be able to compete in women's events.
Maybe they should change them to the transmen's 100 metres and the transwomen's 100 metres, because currently at the when we call it the women's weightlifting event it isnt just women but men as well.
It is women whose biological sex is male.
o, female is biological sex. So her gender would be masculine or feminine.
The dictionary has already proven you wrong on this one, too.
Its not hard, its obvious from reality you are completely deluded. If you look in dictionaries a couple of decades ago the sex is male and female and the gender is masculine and feminine. The concept now has tried to get the gender including male and female and it doesn't work.
Of course it works, and you've not been able to show any way in which it doesn't.
And what dictionaries a couple of decades ago is irrelevant - go back and live then, if you like. Today gender is male and female.
Just how confused and out of touch with reality are you? To be able to communicate with people we have to be able to understand reality let alone language applied to it.
Personal remark ignored. We all understand reality and language applied to it. Well, most of us. Some of us have irrational problems accepting words in common usage.
Not so. The eyes cant be hair any more than the biological sex be the gender. Female is the biological sex of the woman just as eyes and hair are not values but organs of the body. The eye and the hair are different parts of the body that you have applied the colour of brown too, your wife is not two different things that something has been applied to, but the same entity that two different things have been applied to. And the two different things are a contradiction. Its not really an analogy but a confused nonsense.
No, it's an analogy. Gender and sex are different things, just like eyes and hair are different things. You've nowhere shown any contradiction.
But remember, based on the clarification that all of you have given that sex and gender are different I asked you what sex your wife was and you said her gender is female. That would mean they are different the same. Now you are having to tell me, which I have been telling you all along, is that gender can be the same as biological sex. So telling people it is different is not true. And there one has both the deception and the unreality exposed.
I'm curious - do you think that this paragraph of yours actually makes sense? A person's gender can be the same as their biological sex; in most cases it is. That does not make them the same thing, and some people's gender is different to their biological sex. I've no idea why this is so hard for y ou.
as we have seen some do, so you are wrong to claim it is false.
No, we haven't seen any, so I am correct to claim it is false. The dictionary has already shown you to be correct, despite your hatred for it.
No that is what we have shown to be false and deception, not least in that transwomen has the sex 'woman' in it, not the gender 'feminine' Its a lie.
You've not shown anything to be false or deception. And you're still denying what the dictionary says.
The videos are there as evidence for discussion and reasoning and I have quoted and cited what they have said.
Where? Cite where you quoted it.
What the science teacher who identifies as trans says is what I have been telling you.
Cite them saying what you claim they are saying, or give a time reference.
So you don't believe even the people you are trying to talk about.
When you actually produce them saying what you claim, your comment will have meaning.
In evidence as described above. You wont address the reasoning and evidence so you just deny it and repeat the decpetion.
Not in evidence as described above.
No I am exposing what you claim about them is irrational, which it is.
No, you're not. You've not been able to show a single irrationality. Your argument consists entirely of denying dictionary definitions and repeating "isnotisnotisnot" with your fingers in your ears.
Theres a good chap
