So where I pointed put to you its not legal you didnt agree it was murder either.By definition, abortion cannot be murder anywhere it's legal.
So where I pointed put to you its not legal you didnt agree it was murder either.By definition, abortion cannot be murder anywhere it's legal.
So which ones? The ones who make laws that abortion is legal or the ones that make laws that abortion is illegal? Did you not know they differ? Oh no of course you didnt otherwise you wouldnt be posting what you areLawmakers make the law, of course. Do you really not know that?
Does it matter whether the perpetrator is trans or not? A man pretending to be a woman in order to have sex with a man would be using clear deception and could be guilty of rape or sexual assault, (depending on what sexual activity actually took place) I believe there have been one or two cases where this has happened. A post op trans woman who has sex with a man could claim that there was no deception on her part as she considers herself to be legally, morally and physically, female. It would be up to the court to decide in any particular case how much if any deception there was and whether it met the threshold of criminal deceit.Should rape by deception be legal for trans people? To have sex without telling they are trans.
My friend is a victim of this. The person didn't share they were trans until after wards. My friend stopped all communication with the trans person. And is trying to cope with traumatic experience. They dealing with a high level of anxiety now. They are afraid to have any social interactions with anyone male or female they don't already know because they are scared they can't tell the difference.
My friend you live in a complete fantasy land. This post unduly and unnecessarily long. I gave you the English definition of murder above from the dictionary with the link. That really is the end of the discussion.Blatantly and completely false. Consult any dictionary.
I would call that a reflection of sociopathic lack of empathy, and inability to see reality from anyone's perspective, but their own. These people can remember the steps that they took to change the appearance of their body. They also are aware that people who've never met them before don't enjoy that same information advantage. Furthermore, they are well aware of what is downstream from a heterosexual's reason for dating. You can't look at all that together and excuse them for the lack of forthrightness.If they believe that the body they have now is a true reflection of who they are then they wouldn't see it as being dishonest?
If the "Adultress" was pregnant, then WHY would a test for adultery be needed?That's your choice if you believe adulteresses never ever become pregnant, but why weren't male adulterers also commanded to drink a "bitter water" abortifacient and say "so be it, so be it" too?
Or are you just in denial about what the bible actually says and means?
Cite or admit to a falsehood.So where I pointed put to you its not legal you didnt agree it was murder either.
Does it matter whether the perpetrator is trans or not? A man pretending to be a woman in order to have sex with a man would be using clear deception and could be guilty of rape or sexual assault, (depending on what sexual activity actually took place) I believe there have been one or two cases where this has happened. A post op trans woman who has sex with a man could claim that there was no deception on her part as she considers herself to be legally, morally and physically, female. It would be up to the court to decide in any particular case how much if any deception there was and whether it met the threshold of criminal deceit.
The underlying question you are asking is should a trans woman be treated in law as a man or as a woman. Ceteris paribus I think that has been answered in most jurisdictions. You may not like the answer, but then most court judgements leave somebody unhappy.
What are your grounds for saying this?Many trans people know that most biological men and women and many same sex attracted people don't want to have sex with them.
What is your evidence?But some try to get them to do it anyway by getting their consent under the assumption that they think they are what they look like. Whether the trans person believes they are what they look like or not, the person probably wouldn't have given their consent if they knew they were trans. That is the issue.
The point is that every case is different. First, find an actual case. Second try using existing legislation to see if it is sufficient. Thirdly, depending on the outcome assess whether new legislation is required. Fourthly, design the new legislation so that it fixes any problems of natural justice which have Ben identified, without causing new ones. Fifthly pass the legislation. Finally, test the legislation in the courts to ensure it is fit for purpose.To the people who don't want to have sex with trans people this is not in the same category of lying to get sex like some people do. It is extremely serious to some men if they are heterosexual for them to put their private in to the private of another man. Some are willing to kill over it because of how serious it is to them. Just because it isn't serious to those who accept trans people as being the sex they feel they are is besides the point.
So hopefully there is a way to try keep this from happening and punish people who do it.
Now if a person is told by the person that they are trans and they still consent to it then that is different.
I think many years ago I heard of a person who was trans get married to someone who didn't know they were trans. The trans person tricked them. That was horrible. Wanting to be accepted doesn't give someone the right to do that but some think they can force acceptance. And that's a problem.
What are your grounds for saying this?
What is your evidence?
The point is that every case is different. First, find an actual case. Second try using existing legislation to see if it is sufficient. Thirdly, depending on the outcome assess whether new legislation is required. Fourthly, design the new legislation so that it fixes any problems of natural justice which have Ben identified, without causing new ones. Fifthly pass the legislation. Finally, test the legislation in the courts to ensure it is fit for purpose.
Whereabouts on this progress chart are you, or are you asking for a solution to a problem that only exists in your mind?
Is this illegal? You can find people giving tips on how to score all over the Internet. Or so I'm told.Some giving tips on how to trick people into having sex with them.
Because there were no reliable tests for early pregnancies, adulteresses were just commanded to drink a "bitter water" abortifacient and say "so be it, so be it". Which is why male adulterers weren't also commanded to drink a "bitter water" abortifacient and say "so be it, so be it" too, since they don't normally become pregnant, even if you believe that adulteresses never become pregnant either.If the "Adultress" was pregnant, then WHY would a test for adultery be needed?
So what's the difference between a woman's vagina and the vagina of a man with Swyer syndrome such as Hanne Odiole, and what relevance is it to you anyway?It is extremely serious to some men if they are heterosexual for them to put their private in to the private of another man.
So how do you trick people into having sex?tips on how to trick people into having sex with them.
It only takes a month to find out, y'all!Because there were no reliable tests for early pregnancies, adulteresses were just commanded to drink a "bitter water" abortifacient and say "so be it, so be it". Which is why male adulterers weren't also commanded to drink a "bitter water" abortifacient and say "so be it, so be it" too, since they don't normally become pregnant, even if you believe that adulteresses never become pregnant either.
And if the adulteress is not pregnant then the "bitter water" abortifacient will have no effect.It only takes a month to find out, y'all!
Alleged adulteress.If the "Adultress" was pregnant, then WHY would a test for adultery be needed?
I have given you the evidence for this. what are your grounds for not taking any notice of what people tell you?What are your grounds for saying this?
Why are you interrupting? My post was not aimed at you or about anything you have said. Let the man speak for himself.I have given you the evidence for this. what are your grounds for not taking any notice of what people tell you?