Tetsugaku
Well-known member
Again, unsupported that there was ever any such Time=0.They are eternal as they are part of the nature of God. But they did not exist at T=0 within this universe because this universe did not exist.
There was a Time = 0, when this universe did not exist and therefore the laws of logic did not exist in this universe.
It's neither rational, nor justified, nor a fact.I am not trying to justify anything, I am just stating a fact that it is a rational assumption.
Unless your primary source says more than your secondary source, it's of no use to you whatsoever. And if it does, then you need to quote it.No, I gave you the name of the primary source.
We were talking of the creation of the universe, meaning the cause would be in God's temporal dimension while the effect would be in ours. But in any case, we still have no experience of this kind of causation, which means any inductive or abductive case based upon such speculation is undermined.No, the causation only occurred in one dimension of time, just not ours.
Nothing you said addressed my refutation.I did and nothing you said refuted my point.
This is still mere anecdote. And no, I'm not going to go and read an entire book if you aren't going to make a case for its claims.Well respected doctors and nurses observed it. Read the book I provided the name of.
I'm still waiting for you to present your criteria for attributing intentionality, or to at least explain why you think this would require the mind to be more than a pattern of firing neurons and synapses. Obviously I disagree that substance dualism is just as likely or plausible as non-reductive functionalism.I am not saying it cannot be the mind, I am only saying my interpretation is just as likely as yours.