Speculationism on steroids.
Bloogers say so? lol
The claims that the Krebs cycle is "irreducibly complex" are refuted even if this was merely speculation - but that is not the case here. In the post I linked to the blogger quoted a section of a textbook he wrote that explains in detail why we have good reason to think the Kreb's cycle evolved ion that way.
This is just a fraction of the text:
Most species of bacteria do not have a complete citric acid cycle. The most common versions of an incomplete cycle include part of the left-hand side. This short linear pathway leads to production of succinate or succinyl CoA or α-ketoglutarate by a reductive process using oxaloacetate as a starting point. This reductive pathway is the reverse of the traditional cycle that functions in the mitochondria of eukaryotes. In addition, many species of bacteria also have enzymes from part of the right-hand side of the citric acid cycle, especially citrate synthase and aconitase. This allows them to synthesize citrate and isocitrate from oxaloacetate and acetyl CoA. The presence of a forked pathway (Figure 13.24) results in the synthesis of all the precursors of amino acids, porphyrins, and fatty acids.
This is not just speculation, this is science supported by
real evidence.
Those who lie by pretending this is just speculation prove to the rest of us that Christians cannot be trusted. If creationists lie about this, why should we think they would not lie about the resurrection? If this is the morality of Christians, who should we think stories in the gospels are try?
Every time a Christian lies it makes me wonder if the Easter story is just another Christian lie.
sandwalk.blogspot.com
