NO they don't and those quotes have been posted. It is RCs who demote them and ignore what they wrote that they don't like.They always agree with us. That's why we quote them and Protestants demote them.
NO they don't and those quotes have been posted. It is RCs who demote them and ignore what they wrote that they don't like.They always agree with us. That's why we quote them and Protestants demote them.
I don't see the word "Scripture" in there. I see "divine power". What is the context?Oh so you don't trust God.
2 Peter 1.3
His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him who called us by his own glory and goodness.
This means through our knowledge of Jesus, where is that knowledge of Jesus, it is in scripture.
I didn't say it was in there. I said and you need reading comprehension skills obviously - how do we know about Jesus He is in scripture. Try reading it without your RC len on, it may provide clarity. The word scripture does not need to be in there. It is you who is trying to add to scripture. I quoted the verse.I don't see the word "Scripture" in there. I see "divine power". Are you adding to Scripture?
In persona Christi comes straight from Scripture.I didn't say it was in there. I said and you need reading comprehension skills obviously - how do we know about Jesus He is in scripture. Try reading it without your RC len on, it may provide clarity. The word scripture does not need to be in there. It is you who is trying to add to scripture. I quoted the verse.
Your institution shows Jesus in a bad light, if we follow the examples of your leaders past and present we can do whatever we like. The real Jesus cannot be seen in your institution, your Jesus hides behind his mother and he is so scary you need to go through his mother and the actions of your leaders who claim to be in persona Christi shows a weak, sinful Jesus.
IN persona Christi means:
The Church says that the no Priest acts "in persona Christi Capitis".
In persona Christi is a Latin phrase meaning "in the person of Christ", an important concept in Roman Catholicism. Wiki.
In persona Christi comes straight from Scripture.I didn't say it was in there. I said and you need reading comprehension skills obviously - how do we know about Jesus He is in scripture. Try reading it without your RC len on, it may provide clarity. The word scripture does not need to be in there. It is you who is trying to add to scripture. I quoted the verse.
Your institution shows Jesus in a bad light, if we follow the examples of your leaders past and present we can do whatever we like. The real Jesus cannot be seen in your institution, your Jesus hides behind his mother and he is so scary you need to go through his mother and the actions of your leaders who claim to be in persona Christi shows a weak, sinful Jesus.
IN persona Christi means:
The Church says that the no Priest acts "in persona Christi Capitis".
In persona Christi is a Latin phrase meaning "in the person of Christ", an important concept in Roman Catholicism. Wiki.
ROFL. Talk about misusing scripture. Where is the scripture that uses the term in persona christi, I mean RCs ask this of us? I mean in persona Christi relates to more than confession if that is what you are trying to make out with your post.In persona Christi comes straight from Scripture.
2 Cor 2:10
Now to whomever you forgive anything, I also do; and indeed to whom I have forgiven, if I have forgiven anything, it is for the sake of you, in
In persona Christi comes straight from Scripture.
2 Cor 2:10
Now to whomever you forgive anything, I also do; and indeed to whom I have forgiven, if I have forgiven anything, it is for the sake of you, in the person of Christ,
Unlike Jesus they cannot read people's hearts.Lying Catholic priests insist that they forgive sins of others "in the person of Christ."
Come to find out, they admit later they do not know if those who confess are actually forgiven at all.
LOL.
Somehow I don't think the real Christ is so confused....and He definitely does not lie as much.
Yes Peter would be absolutely appalled at what the RCC has done over the centuries and what lies it has taught as doctrines. He would have had nothing to do with such a "church."Yes but they need evidence for their claims whether that is right or wrong in my opinion. They tend to just call people heretics for no real reason . Peter would have nothing to do with the RC and we would be appalled at the way they use him to support their corrupt, false church with its false teachings.
You are funny.
Well that would include Paul since he said it. How kind of you to call him a liar.Lying Catholic priests insist that they forgive sins of others "in the person of Christ."
Come to find out, they admit later they do not know if those who confess are actually forgiven at all.
LOL.
Somehow I don't think the real Christ is so confused....and He definitely does not lie as much.
Peter would be absolutely appalled at what Protestantism has done over the centuries and what lies it has taught as doctrines. He would have nothing to do with such a "church".Yes Peter would be absolutely appalled at what the RCC has done over the centuries and what lies it has taught as doctrines. He would have had nothing to do with such a "church."
Peter would be absolutely appalled at what Protestantism has done over the centuries and what lies it has taught as doctrines. He would have nothing to do with such a "church".
There you go. Fixed it.
Lying Catholic priests insist that they forgive sins of others "in the person of Christ."
Come to find out, they admit later they do not know if those who confess are actually forgiven at all.
The priest is not "confused". The priest confers absolution in the name of Jesus. It is Jesus's forgiveness that is conferred.Somehow I don't think the real Christ is so confused....and He definitely does not lie as much.
This highlights the difference between preaching and practicing. Peter preached the real Gospel message, despite the fact that he did not always follow it. Peter was not sinless. So much for the distinction between "our institution" and Peter.You didn't fix anything. peter preached the real gospel message. But your institution doesn't follow the message peter preached.
Comparing who is the bigger sinner is not the way to resolve the legitimacy of a church, considering that ALL people are sinners. If sinning makes one's church illegitimate then ALL churches are illegitimate.Protestants did NOT torture millions of people over the centuries...
Peter was not sinless
Comparing who is the bigger sinner is not the way to resolve the legitimacy of a church, considering that ALL people are sinners. If sinning makes one's church illegitimate then ALL churches are illegitimate.
Then why is it that in your attack on the Church, instead of citing false teachings, you cited crimes committed by the Church? If your issue is the teachings then stick to talking about the teachings and don't resort to the red herring of "crimes committed by the Church".I never said he was.
Its what a church teaches that is the issue, not that all peoples are sinners.
Then why is it that in your attack on the Church, instead of citing false teachings, you cited crimes committed by the Church? If your issue is the teachings then stick to talking about the teachings and don't resort to the red herring of "crimes committed by the Church".
Peter would be absolutely appalled at what Protestantism has done over the centuries and what lies it has taught as doctrines. He would have nothing to do with such a "church".
Peter was not sinless.
Well that would include Paul since he said it.Lying Catholic priests insist that they forgive sins of others "in the person of Christ."
Come to find out, they admit later they do not know if those who confess are actually forgiven at all.
LOL.
Somehow I don't think the real Christ is so confused....and He definitely does not lie as much.
Lying Catholic priests insist that they forgive sins of others "in the person of Christ."
Come to find out, they admit later they do not know if those who confess are actually forgiven at all.
That makes sense since the forgiveness is contingent upon the sincerity of the penitent. No one ever said that a priest forgives the sins of the insincere.
The priest confers absolution in the name of Jesus. It is Jesus's forgiveness that is conferred.
Peter would be absolutely appalled at what RCs have done throughout the centuries, especially the false claim they are his successors. How can they be his successors when they fail to meet the scriptural requirements for leaders.Peter would be absolutely appalled at what Protestantism has done over the centuries and what lies it has taught as doctrines. He would have nothing to do with such a "church".
There you go. Fixed it.