He didn't drop it, the case got dismissed! Are you thick?
You know that’s worse, right?
He didn't drop it, the case got dismissed! Are you thick?
Where did I assert that it doesn't exist?LOL. What weak spin. I asked whats taking so long to release the Epstein Island list. Your laughable reply is it doesn't exist.
1. The House votes to impeach (or not).I remember the Senate not voting to impeach.
And the impeachment vote wasn't????????????????????1. The House votes to impeach (or not).
The Senate votes to convict (or not).
2. Conviction votes are basically partisan.
And the house vote wasn't????????????????????????????????It was a partisan vote.
Never said they weren't.And the impeachment vote wasn't????????????????????
Thanks for the correction.Never said they weren't.
Impeachment = "the party in control of the House thinks that the President did something wrong".
Acquittal = "the President's party has enough Senators to preclude a super-majority".
Nothing more.
Several Republican congressmen voted to impeach Trump on the second occasion.And the house vote wasn't????????????????????????????????
...RINO's?Several Republican congressmen voted to impeach Trump on the second occasion.
And several senators voted to convict.
Based on what?...RINO's?
AWWWW!!!! Gets corrected and starts to insult.lol I bet you can use some plastic surgery, since Halloween only comes once a year!.lolClick the link you quoted when responding. Until you do, Jenny Craig is your best option.
Post 49 and 51. NEXT!Where did I assert that it doesn't exist?
Quote, please.
Here is post #49, in its entirety:Post 49 and 51. NEXT!
This is positing an alternative, not making an assertion.Or, they don't exist.
These are questions, not assertions.If it exists, where is it?
If you don't know, on what do you base your claim that it exists?
Nice backpeddling.lolHere is post #49, in its entirety:
This is positing an alternative, not making an assertion.
Here is post #51, in its entirety:
These are questions, not assertions.
I think I just did.Care to retract?
Backpedalling?Nice backpeddling.lol
Where is it, then?The mere possibility that a list doesn't exist is laughable. WEAK!
Questions are not allusions.Again you are alluding to the fact that there may be no list,
You don't don't to tell me what I know, let alone what everybody knows.EVERYONE knows there is a list of people who visited the Island.
A retraction would be a reversal.I think I just did.
LOL! The fact that your argument was that the proof does not or may not exist is laughable.Backpedalling?
I quoted the post, and it did not assert what you said it did.
Where is it, then?
(Again, a question; not an assertion.)
Questions are not allusions.
They are questions.
You don't don't to tell me what I know, let alone what everybody knows.
A retraction would be a reversal.
An admission that you made a mistake.
I won't hold my breath.
What list?Let's start again! Why hasn't the list been made public and why haven't there been any arrests!!
What do you mean, "again"?Tell us again how the list may not exist.
And this is a fallacy.Anyone with half a brain
You asserted that this list exists.Your defense on the other hand is laughable.
What list?
The one that hasn't yet been proven to exist?
What do you mean, "again"?
I never told you that the first time.
And this is a fallacy.
You asserted that this list exists.
I asked for evidence of that.
You have offered none.
Your getting owned and still play dumb.lolI have nothing to defend.
Again, this assumes that such a list exists.Here we go again! The log list of the people who visited the Island and the clients of the underaged girls!
How?We know the list exists.
You cant be that naive. I'm done here. I'll be waiting for your non corrupt justice system to provide something, anything about the Epstein clients(we know exist) and the charges laid.Again, this assumes that such a list exists.
How?