

your boring me. Please give us the order given in Ezekiel 36:26,27. You don't go to the end of chapter and read backwards. You will learn that next year when your in the 4th grade.
I will stick by my choice meat comments until you tell me the context in which the choice meat used the term and why James White objected.
Where does it speak of conditional election? Show us we will wait
You are running from the issues
You were asked to
show where the New covenant teaches unbelieving, unforgiven, unjustified children of wrath are indwelt by the Spirit turning them to believers as you theology requires
why is it you cannot do so ?
As I stated
this you never even attempt for it is so ridiculously unbiblical it should not be taken seriously
As for your choice to go to the old covenant
it would have been appropriate for you to address this
Do you believe the old covenant contradicts the New ?
crickets
Believers today are under the old covenant ?
still more crickets
If you want to know what the New covenant teaches would you go to the New or the old Covenant ?
Why no answer to such a simple question
Ezekiel never mentions faith and concerns those who are his people
Ezekiel 36:8 (KJV)
8 But ye, O mountains of Israel, ye shall shoot forth your branches, and yield your fruit
to my people of Israel; for they are at hand to come.
Ezekiel 36:12 (KJV)
12 Yea, I will cause men to walk upon you,
even my people Israel; and they shall possess thee, and thou shalt be their inheritance, and thou shalt no more henceforth bereave them
of men.
Ezekiel 36:20 (NIV2011)
20 And wherever they went among the nations they profaned my holy name, for it was said of them, ‘
These are the LORD’s people, and yet they had to leave his land.’
nothing there about enemies of God being turned into believers by the indwelling of the Holy spirit
but that is what you theology requires
and you cannot provide it
that points out the fact your theology is built upon a faulty foundation and is not consistent with the whole council of God
Rather you take one verse which you can read your theology into (it is never so stated) and then ignore the fact it is
contradicted by other scriptures previously pointed out
It is not a sound methodology rather being an effort to twist scripture to support what it does not