Immaterial to my argument. Gays can call their "union" whatever they want. Government has no interest in sanctioning their claim...except to assuage their feelings...and government has no real interest in assuaging feelings.I know what it means - gay marriage will not reduce the birth rate because gays won't be reproducing whether they are married or not.
Oh please. Who cares what you claimed. If you don't defend the whole alphabet argument, you're not the one who will get me fired from my teaching position when. I don't address the ten year old the way the twisted mother insists I address whatever. Do you deny the claim is being made by those with lawyers to make good on their threats?Where did I claim otherwise?
Who cares if my friends and I are being dragged in front of the school board while you sit and say nothing? Is that supposed to make a difference?Don't assume that all of your opponents think alike across the board.
My students are being mislead by abusive parents infected by the claims...It's not time for you and me to be bickering over non-essentials.
See the preamble to the US constitution. There is no state interest in offering the same benefits to those who are interested in securing the blessings of freedom onto a posterity. The rest do not matter. Who cares what they call their friendship? If legitimacy is only established in government sanction...explain why a friendship should be sanctioned?See my first sentence - the US population is in no danger from gay marriage.
Nothing wrong with pursuing happiness...there is no purpose in giving tax breaks to happy people.Also, I seem to recall "... life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness..." being in there somewhere...