Still no fossils

[rossum]

F. would have to physically produce Rossum stating the claim. I'm not even sure video of Rossum would suffice, would it?

The video itself might be evidence, but in ferengi-world, a link to the video is not evidence. Links are not evidence for ferengi.

 

[mikeT]

Anyone who has faith in evolutionism has by default made that claim.

Since evolutionism only exists in the heads of creationists, your sentence has no objective meaning.

 

[CrowCross]

Since evolutionism only exists in the heads of creationists, your sentence has no objective meaning.

No, your fervent faith in evolution is an ism.

 

[mikeT]

No, your fervent faith in evolution is an ism.

You don't have the ability to see into my head, and thus cannot know the strength of any faith I have, about anything.

Due to you literally making up words and stuff up about other people, your claims about such things have no merit.

 

[CrowCross]

You don't have the ability to see into my head, and thus cannot know the strength of any faith I have, about anything.

Due to you literally making up words and stuff up about other people, your claims about such things have no merit.

Are you now saying mutations didn't create our DNA?

 

[ferengi]

You've provided no evidence that Rossum made this claim.

Your evidence is?

 

[ferengi]

The video itself might be evidence, but in ferengi-world, a link to the video is not evidence. Links are not evidence for ferengi.

Does Information get copied from the environment into DNA by random mutation and natural selection?

 

[ferengi]

The video itself might be evidence, but in ferengi-world, a link to the video is not evidence. Links are not evidence for ferengi.

Do random mutations produce DNA?

 

[mikeT]

Your evidence is?

Your complete lack of evidence, of course, as well as your unwillingness to even pretend you're going to submit any.

aka. you lose

 

[rossum]

Does Information get copied from the environment into DNA by random mutation and natural selection?

Yes it does. Some random mutations do not match the environment, those are deleterious mutations which are eliminated by natural selection. Other random mutations better match the environment, those are beneficial mutations which are increased and spread by natural selection.

Over many generations the information in the population's DNA changes to better match the information in the environment.

 

[ferengi]

Your complete lack of evidence,

Unsupported assertions and arguments from ignorance are not evidence.

 

[ferengi]

Yes it does.

Your evidence is?

 

[rossum]

Your evidence is?

Some random mutations do not match the environment, those are deleterious mutations which are eliminated by natural selection. Other random mutations better match the environment, those are beneficial mutations which are increased and spread by natural selection.

Over many generations the information in the population's DNA changes to better match the information in the environment.

 

[ferengi]

Some random mutations do not match the environment, those are deleterious mutations which are eliminated by natural selection. Other random mutations better match the environment, those are beneficial mutations which are increased and spread by natural selection.
Over many generations the information in the population's DNA changes to better match the information in the environment.

Unsupported assertions are not evidence.

 

[rossum]

Unsupported assertions are not evidence.

Thnk you for that unsupported assertion, ferengi. Please show us your evidence.

 

[ferengi]

Thnk you for that unsupported assertion, ferengi. Please show us your evidence.

Still no evidence and shifting the burden.

 

[rossum]

Still no evidence and shifting the burden.

Still no evidence from ferengi.

 

[ferengi]

Still no evidence from ferengi.

Still no evidence and shifting the burden.