nice dodging .... and yet you can't drag yourself away from the darinian evo... to admit that the the science shows that the genes existed long before they were expressed in form.... now how can blind slow random evo account for that? Try again?
They have different eyes though. Why do they have different eyes? (I'll give you a hint: all vertebrates have one sort of eye, and all squid have another.....care to guess why that is? Give it a shot!)
but you in fact did say it blindly stumbles upon 'similar solutions'.... lol now let's see you explain your new 'similar solutions' problem. You see you need guidance for both ... concluding similarity... and coming to a 'solution' .... you seem to be front-loading the answer and you don't even comprehend it. best you just step back and think before typing ...you will be more believable (maybe) SMH... similar solutions... and you can't even explain that one... just that it must be. too funny
"High resolution three dimennsional vision provides a selective advantage" is not "guidance". LOL.
then step up and do what no other A/mat here is able to .... show how evolution front-loaded the PAX6 gene into life.... long (millions of years) before it was even expressed..... seems like some intelligence was needed... because now we all know that random blind dumb luck was not the cause.
and yet you can't even explain how or why the genes needed for life's eyes ... limbs ...etc were already front-loaded long before the evo-devo need for them arose. shoot I'd have more respect for you if you at least admitted that much...and said it was just some unknown aspect of evolution not yet understood...... yet you just wallow in your faith of lacking
You bounce between topics like a hyperactive ping pong ball.
And you still can't show us any evidence to support your claim that the genus Tritosecale was manufactured from laboratory chemicals or from the straw which you are try to grasp.
And you dodge like the inept materialist you prop yourself up to be
Not quite, dear. Pax6 is found in bilaterian metazoans. A distinct gene (PaxB) with similar molecular function is in more basal metazoa, including sponges WHICH DON'T HAVE EYES but do have photoreceptors.PaxB is also expressed in Cnidaria, but they require the participation of OTHER transcription factors to make functional eyes
silly boy.... try reading with comprehension:
Already read, and replied to. You aren't answering the question: squid and fish have different eye structures.silly boy.... try reading with comprehension:
Humans & Squids Evolved Eyes with Same Genes | RealClearScience
Editor's Note: This article was provided by The Conversation. The original is here. Eyes and wings are among the most stunning innovations evolution has created. Remarkably these features have...www.realclearscience.com
And perhaps you should ask your Sunday School teacher or an intelligent banana to explain to you the definition of the word "evolution" and how the genus Tritosecale evolved from the genus Triticum and the genus Secale by cross fertilization, and was not manufactured from laboratory chemicals as you falsely claim, or by an intelligent banana waving a magic wand.
you keep dodging the question.... micro evolution can explain the differences in complexity.... but no amount of evolution can explain the coding in the earliest genes that coded for eyes long before they ever appeared (no pun intended)..... maybe you are smart enough or maybe you can phone your socialist prof for help... I'll wait till you google up something
you certainly don't seem that smart ..maybe you got your 'claimed' PHD on-line (or maybe you didn't) at all but every scientists knows that Triticale was first manufactured in a lab..... your ignorance is astounding
Why not? Show the math please. In specific, please demonstrate that PaxB could not possibly evolve.