That is just not true and there is no proof that it was altered. The support for it as being reliable is real, there is absolutly zero support for an altered docket page.
I have pasted the copied dockets pages here maybe 20 times...remember when I showed you JS was a prisoner?
DB did not say tha,t BoJ did. And he nor you remotely understand the argument.
This is what DB wrote...
"But here is my question--which does not seem to be addressed in any source I can find:
If Emily Pearsall( Niece of Justice Neely) --tore the 1826 "trial" page(s) from Judge Neely's docket, and went to Utah with that record in the mid 1800's(which record suddenly disappears for a century)--then how did that very record then suddenly reappear again with the New York court records, under the discovery of Walters in the 1970's"
Which makes zero sense.
The torn docket pages were first published in England, in 1872 after Emily's death, which is 46 years, not a century. The bill, in Justice Neely's handwriting, was found in the basement of the county jail in Norwich, in 1971, which matched the docket page charges. I thought DB understood the argument, but I guess he does not. One was the page in his personal Docket, the other was a "bill" (invoice) to the county for his charges, again the bill being in his handwriting.
An interesting side note is that in in 1986, an overzealous Mormon, Ronald Vern Jackson, made a claim of forgery, and long story short, claimed that the bill was altered, which turned out it was, by him, trying to dispute it.
