Electric Skeptic
Well-known member
So you stopped beating your wife then?So you knew God then?
Like yours, you mean? Let's not forget that you, too, have an unbelieving mind.Oh the wondrous meanders of a unbelieving mind.
So you stopped beating your wife then?So you knew God then?
Like yours, you mean? Let's not forget that you, too, have an unbelieving mind.Oh the wondrous meanders of a unbelieving mind.
One of your more amusing contradictions. If unbelief doesn't exist, why are you constantly whining about all of us (including you) who have unbelief?Actually in reality unbelief doesn't exist, because if belief exists and all knowledge of the truth and reality only comes through belief, then in reality unbelief can't tell us anything about the truth.
Please don't tell me you're not resurrecting the same argument which you lost here several years ago...Actually in reality unbelief doesn't exist
So you stopped beating your wife then?
Like yours, you mean? Let's not forget that you, too, have an unbelieving mind.
One of your more amusing contradictions. If unbelief doesn't exist, why are you constantly whining about all of us (including you) who have unbelief?
Please don't tell me you're not resurrecting the same argument which you lost here several years ago...
Nope.The state of unbelief or lack of belief is the state of something not occurring in reality
Nope.
"Straw man" and "unbelief": two terms you've proven (in the last 5 minutes) you don't understand.
Unbelief is merely a lack of belief in the truth or existence of a thing. For example, you wallow in unbelief whenever you object to belief's ability to make falsehoods known to you as truth.
And yet you consistently misidentify when people are misrepresenting you.A strawman is when you misrepresent my position and then argue against your misrepresentation rather than my position in reality.
Then you agree that unbelief exists in reality.And unbelief is just a lack of belief.
And yet you consistently misidentify when people are misrepresenting you.
Then you agree that unbelief exists in reality.
Where did you point this out?No I don't, as I just pointed out how you were misrepresenting my position
That's different from what you wrote before. You said unbelief is just a lack of belief; the "in reality" bit is something you're dishonestly tacking onto your previous claim.No, rather unbelief is just a lack of belief in reality.Then you agree that unbelief exists in reality.
That's different from what you wrote before. You said unbelief is just a lack of belief; the "in reality" bit is something you're dishonestly tacking onto your previous claim.
No straw man, just your misrepresentation of my argument.
Yours.Another strawman.
You do not know what the word 'strawman' means, as you demonstrate every time you use it.Evasion. I have never beaten my wife.
Again, so did you know God or not?
Strawman
I have a believing mind, because I believe in order to know anything about the truth and reality, then I must believe it first before the truth and reality is made known to me. That's a believing mind.
False yet again. Why do you continually state falsehoods about me and others? Is your position weak that it cannot stand up to the truth?But you on the other hand; you have a unbelieving mind, because you disbelieve that you have to believe first in order know anything about the truth and reality.
You have an unbelieving mind as well.you have a unbelieving mind, because you disbelieve that you have to believe first in order know anything about the truth and reality.
So where does lack of belief occur? If I say "I don't believe in God" is that an unbelief or a belief and where does it occur?Here's another strawman.
No, rather unbelief is just a lack of belief in reality. I believe that belief is what occurs in reality and unbelief or lack of belief is what doesn't occur in reality. Understand?
So where does lack of belief occur?
If I say "I don't believe in God" is that an unbelief or a belief and where does it occur?