As I don't pretend human beings can be killed because I think they are paracites(sic), I don't see why I should give any reasons. Perhaps you would like to give reasons why you persistently misrepresent my position? The logical reason would be that you find it impossible to attack my actual position, so misrepresentation is all you have.
Woman, Temujin, in observable reality, biological sex and dictionary definition, is the adult female of the species with xx chromosomes, female anatomy and female reproductive organs. A man is the adult male human being with XY chromosomes, male anatomy and male reproductive organs. So when somone like yourself says a man who calls himself a 'transwoman' is a woman, be sure to know that when you use the word woman we know you dont know who or what you are talking about.
Sorry, did you not call the foetus a paracite? Shall I check if its actually you misrepresenting my position and you making the false accustations.
I have never called anything a paracite. The foetus is of course biologically parasitic on its mother. That is a simple scientific observation. It is not the basis for any moral judgement either way. Nor is it some kind of slight or insult. Just an objective scientific fact.
You mentioned women so it is crucial to understand what you mean as part of the this thread.
Obviously parasite and not paracite and therefore yes you have called the foetus a parasite. So you have falsely accused me.
and your reasons have been exposed as devoid of sound rational, logical and moral basis by the refutations.
On the contrary, you made an untrue statement regarding my reasons behind my support for abortion. One of several, different untrue statements. As I have said, misrepresentation is seemingly all you have.
Nonsense. You have refuted nothing. You haven't even established a case for your own position, let alone refuted mine. You even fail to refute the straw man misrepresentations you have constantly used.
The meaning of woman doesn't change to suit your argument using the pretext of context. Since you call a man who calls himself a 'transwoman' a woman, clearly you don't properly recognise what a woman is, so you aren't credible when you talk about women in a conversation.
Crucial to your posts as described. Since you dont always recognise what a woman is, we cant be sure what you are trying to say.
Which bit? You have included the foetus as a parasite in your argument for pro-choice abortion, and so how is it untrue? Were you telling fibs ar the time?
Firstly I do not pretend that unborn humans can be killed. It is a reality. That is what legal abortion permits. I am not pretending. I, unlike you, am acknowledging that reality.
Yes I know all that, but that isnt what I challenged you on, about your statement.
What on earth are you talking about?
Well you worry about yourself chap. Take care.
Nothing more dangerous than an abortion. At least one dead.