You are missing the point... Intentionally, I believe. The point is, we are not making it up. It is a Biblical fact. If you have a. Issue with it go argue with the author.
LOL No, my Church, Christ Jesus,does not have a Temple
The , clearly, your church isn't the church that John saw would exist in the last days. That appears to be a serious problem. That would indicate that your church is an imposter.
Of course, you could just explain how the Bible is wrong, but that still leaves you empty handed.
You don’t defend your beliefs
I think that's obviously false.
that you don’t define or articulate your beliefs
Also false. You don't get to define my beliefs, so the fact that I disagree with what you claim I believe doesn't mean I don't articulate them. In fact, I do and I am very clear about what I believe and I'm pretty sure that those beliefs are aligned with what my church and it's leaders teach. But I sense that the argument is about to change and your starting off into another rabbit hole.
The results of this argument have been met, we are being attacked by so-called Christians for resembling the actual New Testament church when they have nothing even remotely like it. No prophets, no apostles, not temples. One has to wonder, what is the source of their organization. It certainly isn't the Bible.
you only follow a baseline of talking points.
I'm pretty sure that's not true either. But more to the point, why doesn't your church have these very basic Biblical elements? In fact, why is it an issue to have continued scripture? The New Testament church had continuing scripture. What happened? Why are you guys so far off the baseline?
I do see that is a define need for you to change the subject.
