You are wrong. Your epistemological method is also unverifiable. Anyone can claim they are right because that have the Holy Spirit and those they disagree with are wrong because they don't. If we are just going to assert things and then say they are true because of the Holy Spirit, we are wasting our time. I can just do the same and round and round we go...My insistence is that I do not interpret scripture, but that God reveals the spiritual truths within scripture to me and those who are born again.
It is folly to not see it you way... Got it.No. I am saying that if you are only able to interpret scripture or lean on the interpretation of other men then you do not have the indwelling HS that reveals the Spiritual truths within scripture.
The natural man cannot understand the Spiritual, for it is folly to him.
But I do, since you have truth revelated to you directly by God. To not agree with you is the not believe God.You don't have to agree with me, that is your prerogative.
Yes I have.
Here, apply some hermeneutic to these scriptures and tell me what you understand it to mean:
17 For Christ did not send me to baptize but to preach the gospel, and not with words of eloquent wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.
5 that your faith might not rest in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood this, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
10 these things God has revealed to us through the Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God.
14 The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
This is getting old. I get it... Your "reading" of Scripture is correct because you "read" it in the Spirit. I don't read it the same way, so my reading of it is "natural." Please....Does your hermaneutic tell you that you can interpret scripture with scripture in the natural?
Your insistence that I interpret scripture remains debunked.
You are not the Holy Spirit.What do you mean? Can you correct the Holy Spirit?
Again, you are not the Holy Spirit.Are you so blinded that you think God reveals untruths to those He indwells? Why do you want to try and correct the HS?
Is this an actual revelation apart from Scripture? Is God teaching you directly? What revelation are you talking about?Why can you NOT agree that your own interpretation of scripture without revelation from God can be corrected by God through His perfect revelation?
Surely....What is keeping you from accepting that? Surely it is not me.....
Finally, we agree!This is getting boring and ridiculous.
Dang, it was nice while it lasted...I have made my point well enough.
What revelation? Are you talking about the Bible or some special revelation from the Holy Spirit that is only for you? And if I trust you doesn't that mean I trust men?You can carry on putting your trust in your own abilities and those of other men.
I will trust in God and I will stand on His revelation.
You think the Borgia Pope was Holy....
Ever heard of David? Also, you are sowing divisions... I must stop engaging with you...It shows you how much you lack revelation of what it means to be holy...
You think this means holy:
9 Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, 21 envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
I never claimed such a thing.You also think "will not inherit the kingdom of God" actually means "God uses sinful men like the Borgia Pope, therefore despite his continuous unrepentant sins listed here he WILL INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD" I don't care that it says will not!
Question: is your pastor sinless?He among others of your so-called successors were devils, and were most certainly not representing Christ who lived a perfectly sinless life. To even call him and others the representative of Christ is blasphemy.
You do not understand the role of pope and why we refer to them that way. It must be because you do not have the Holy Spirit.Is your argument therefore NOT that the Borgia pope represented Jesus Christ?
Is your argument not that he was at one point your most holy Father?
I can be correct by correct things. What you have presented is not correct and is supported by you claiming to be the Holy Spirit.And yet you are the one that stands un-correctable despite all the logic and scriptural support given. Like a child who blocks his ears and goes nuhuh.....
I never endorsed any sinful action and I condemn any sinful action by any pope.Logic 101
By endorsing the Borgia Pope as your most holy Father and the representative of Jesus Christ on earth, you are endorsing his unrepentant lifestyle and sin as being that of a most holy man who is representing Christ on earth.
You think this is just say so....
1 John 1:99 Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, 21 envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Here I leave you. You have continually misrepresented by views. You are also uncorrectable and your epistemology is unverifiable.