The Church vs. The Individual

Anselm01

Active member
LOL! The only thing funnier is that your post got no response. Could it be that it is not considered fair to point out the obvious?

It was the individual, the Roman Pope, who went against a body of believers of which he was a part rather than submit.

What will they think of next?
And this is different from each individual Protestant being the final say on what is and what is not "biblical." Remember, God's perfect context in reading the Bible is whatever you think it is. At least the pope has apostolic succession. You got nothing.
 

BJ Bear

Well-known member
And this is different from each individual Protestant being the final say on what is and what is not "biblical." Remember, God's perfect context in reading the Bible is whatever you think it is. At least the pope has apostolic succession. You got nothing.
Apart from your misinterpretation of Scripture and it's right interpretation according to it's God given perfect immediate context, it is clear from Scripture and history that the Roman Pope has nothing more or less than every other wild eyed fanatic or cultist who thinks he has swallowed the Holy Spirit, feathers and all.
 

Anselm01

Active member
Apart from your misinterpretation of Scripture and it's right interpretation according to it's God given perfect immediate context, it is clear from Scripture and history that the Roman Pope has nothing more or less than every other wild eyed fanatic or cultist who thinks he has swallowed the Holy Spirit, feathers and all.
Careful, you may come off as brash.

I am still waiting on that definition of "God given perfect immediate context." As far as I can tell it is whatever you want it to be...
 

BJ Bear

Well-known member
Careful, you may come off as brash.
Just an observation based on his claims and actions throughout the Roman Pope's novel history.
I am still waiting on that definition of "God given perfect immediate context." As far as I can tell it is whatever you want it to be...
I gave it to you in the other thread, then demonstrated it according to your proposition, but as of yet you haven't responded.
 

BJ Bear

Well-known member
Novel, right...
The Roman Pope's basis is novelty as are the many of the office holders subsequent actions and doctrines. A case in point is that of the post in this thread to which you still haven't responded.
Can you let me know what thread and post #? I will respond. I may have missed it.
It is the last post in the Difference Between Biblical And False Teaching.
 

Manfred

Well-known member
Back at you!

Okay... this does not apply to you.
How ridiculous.
You think the word of God does not apply to believers.....

But we have at least established that you can only interpret scripture, and that the spiritual truths in scripture is not revealed to you.

Why you keep insisting that applies to me is only you closing your ears and going blah blah blah as you do not believe me when I say the indwelling Holy Spirit reveals the Spiritual truths contained within scripture. These Spiritual truths were not the opinions and interpretations of the Authors of scriptures, but they were inspired by the Spirit and revealed by the Spirit.

Again, and for the last time. I have never justified the evil actions of any man. Nor have I stated that the Holy Spirit produces evil fruit.
You claim that the Borgia Pope succeeded Peter as the pope of God God's Church. That he represented Christ on earth.

By making this claim, you are doing exactly what you are denying above!

You justify his evil acts by saying God used him .... According to your beliefs and not mine, he "was" Christ or the embodiment of Christ.
Justifying his sin by saying God used his sin is blasphemy, as you equate the same to Christ who the Pope represents.
Can can use anyone He wants, even people who are evil.
Genesis 50:20
20 As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.
And the ones who meant evil? Were they representing God on earth? Were they born again believers or were they enemies of God....
Your argument is that someone who supposedly represents Christ or who is the true representative of Christ had the exact opposite attributes displayed by Christ as man...

You are so blinded you cannot even see that for those who do such things, there is no place in the Kingdom of God and therefore you pretend he spent some time in purgatory and then he will inherit the Kingdom of God.
"I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God."
Jesus also personally picked a traitor.
Luke 6:12-16
12 In these days he went out to the mountain to pray, and all night he continued in prayer to God. 13 And when day came, he called his disciples and chose from them twelve, whom he named apostles: 14 Simon, whom he named Peter, and Andrew his brother, and James and John, and Philip, and Bartholomew, 15 and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon who was called the Zealot, 16 and Judas the son of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor.
And you think he inherited the kingdom of God.
Are you now a universalist that believes you can do as much evil as you want and God uses you, so he will excuse you and pamper you in heaven for being able to use you!

22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory

Ex opere operato "from the work performed." The Holy Spirit can work through any vessel, regardless of the state of their souls at the time. Sacramentally, a person's individual holiness cannot affect efficacy, as it is a grace that is given by Christ Himself. Efficacy depends on the proper disposition of the person receiving grace, not the person through which the grace is given.

You would have found a home with the Donatists on the 4th to 6th centuries.
He can yes. So are you saying the Pope who is the supposed successor of Peter was not born again and the he did not have to display the fruit of the Holy Spirit but his works of evil was as he was lead by the Holy Spirit?
You are one confused Padre
Well, I did not do that, so I am good.
You attribute the evil acts of the representative of Christ the so called "Holy" Father, Pope Borgia to the Holy Spirit.
That would be the same as attributing incest and murder to the work of the Holy Spirit.
 

Manfred

Well-known member
I have 'life within me' [Jn 6]
Why contradict yourself then?
That you follow man and his [new] traditions
NWRT
Yes, pray for enlightenment
I already told you that the Holy Spirit indwelling me reveals the Spiritual truths to me, and you already admitted that He does not indwell you but only your "Church" and you think I should pray for "enlightenment"?
What enlightenment would that be?
 

Anselm01

Active member
How ridiculous.
You think the word of God does not apply to believers.....
No. I believe it does, but you are using it wrong.
But we have at least established that you can only interpret scripture, and that the spiritual truths in scripture is not revealed to you.
No, you have not.
Why you keep insisting that applies to me is only you closing your ears and going blah blah blah as you do not believe me when I say the indwelling Holy Spirit reveals the Spiritual truths contained within scripture. These Spiritual truths were not the opinions and interpretations of the Authors of scriptures, but they were inspired by the Spirit and revealed by the Spirit.
Nope. They are your OPINIONS only. I know you want to give your opinions divine authority, but it will not happen as long as you persist in error.
You claim that the Borgia Pope succeeded Peter as the pope of God God's Church. That he represented Christ on earth.
Not how the papacy works.
By making this claim, you are doing exactly what you are denying above!
No.
You justify his evil acts by saying God used him .... According to your beliefs and not mine, he "was" Christ or the embodiment of Christ.
Justifying his sin by saying God used his sin is blasphemy, as you equate the same to Christ who the Pope represents.
Nope. The pope is not the "embodiment of Christ" on earth.
And the ones who meant evil? Were they representing God on earth? Were they born again believers or were they enemies of God....
Are you talking about the sons of Jacob? You know, one of those sons was Judah (the ancestor of Jesus), btw.
Your argument is that someone who supposedly represents Christ or who is the true representative of Christ had the exact opposite attributes displayed by Christ as man...
My argument is that God can use sinners. Here is a news flash: you are also a sinner.
You are so blinded you cannot even see that for those who do such things, there is no place in the Kingdom of God and therefore you pretend he spent some time in purgatory and then he will inherit the Kingdom of God.
"I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God."
Never claimed this.
And you think he inherited the kingdom of God.
I have no idea if he did or not.
Are you now a universalist that believes you can do as much evil as you want and God uses you, so he will excuse you and pamper you in heaven for being able to use you!
Nope.
22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory.
God can do as He pleases.
He can yes. So are you saying the Pope who is the supposed successor of Peter was not born again and the he did not have to display the fruit of the Holy Spirit but his works of evil was as he was lead by the Holy Spirit?
You are one confused Padre
I am saying God is faithful regardless of our faithlessness.
You attribute the evil acts of the representative of Christ the so called "Holy" Father, Pope Borgia to the Holy Spirit.
No. Not how the papacy works.
That would be the same as attributing incest and murder to the work of the Holy Spirit.
No. I am done with you. Matthew 10:14.
 

Manfred

Well-known member
No. I believe it does, but you are using it wrong.
Because I believe the Holy Spirit reveals the Spiritual truths in the Bible while you merely interpret it as the fancy catches you....
Nope. They are your OPINIONS only. I know you want to give your opinions divine authority, but it will not happen as long as you persist in error.
And you can discern Spiritual truths in the natural..... I think not. As per your own testimony, you are only able to interpret it the way you want to. There is no Spiritual revelation only self....
Not how the papacy works.

No.

Nope. The pope is not the "embodiment of Christ" on earth.
"Vicar of Christ (from Latin Vicarius Christi) is a term used in different ways and with different theological connotations throughout history. The original notion of a vicar is as an "earthly representative of Christ", but it's also used in the sense of "person acting as parish priest in place of a real person."[1] The title is now used in Catholicism to refer to the bishops[2] and more specifically was historically used to the Bishop of Rome (the pope). "

Why do you pretend otherwise?
Are you talking about the sons of Jacob? You know, one of those sons was Judah (the ancestor of Jesus), btw.
I gave you Judas and Pharaoh as an example, why do you pretend I dd not?
My argument is that God can use sinners. Here is a news flash: you are also a sinner.
News flash. I am no longer a slave to sin. I have been redeemed by Christ my Lord and Savior, and I am no longer an unredeemed sinner.
I am under grace, as are all other born again believers, and I am not yet perfected, but we are on a journey of sanctification. On this journey our lives change for the better as we walk in the Spirit and not in the flesh.
Pick up a Bible and read about these things...

If you want to correctly label the Borgia Pope and yourself as unredeemed sinners, go ahead. I will not be lumped into the same mold as you. Where is the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit evidenced in the life of the sinner? Your insistence that the Holy Spirit works through sin is and will remain blasphemy.

Never claimed this.
You insistently claim that the Holy Spirit uses sinners and they will end up in heaven.
Do you as a Catholic now deny purgatory?
I have no idea if he did or not.
You have no idea?
This proves my point in that you are only able to interpret scripture as the whim takes you.
What do you interpret this to mean:
19 Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, 21 envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. (Gal 5)
Nope.

God can do as He pleases.
And you believe it pleases God to sin by ascribing the sin of your depraved Pope as the work of the Holy Spirit.
Your assertion is that the Holy Spirit used the sin of the Borgia Pope. Can you give an example of how it was used?
I am saying God is faithful regardless of our faithlessness.
Of course He is. Do you think He will be unfaithful to His own word?
When He says that people who behave like your Borgia pope behaved will not inherit the Kingdom of God your reaction is you think he may have inherited the Kingdom of God, despite what God said.
No. Not how the papacy works.

No. I am done with you. Matthew 10:14.
And you think that you have been presenting the gospel?

All you have managed to do is to make a feeble attempt to prove your church is the church Jesus Christ is building. It clearly is not. Jesus does not need to use a depraved individual as head of His church, where every atheist can point a finger and say, if that is Christianity, then I am in a good place....
 

Manfred

Well-known member
No contradiction... life within me [The Eucharist]
Sad how you have to be convinced you swallow life and then only temporarily for you have to do it again and again


13 In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it, to the praise of his glory.

I am sealed once for as long as I have this wretched body with the Holy Spirit.

You are at least consistent in that you admit you are not indwelt by the Holy Spirit and receive life temporarily every time you follow a ritualistic belief system.
 

Arch Stanton

Well-known member
Sad how you have to be convinced you swallow life and then only temporarily for you have to do it again and again
unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you DO NOT HAVE LIFE within you

For MY FLESH IS TRUE FOOD, and my blood is true drink.
 

Manfred

Well-known member
unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you DO NOT HAVE LIFE within you

For MY FLESH IS TRUE FOOD, and my blood is true drink.
Why do you have to do it repeatedly?

Is life not life?

You should start thinking for yourself...
10 And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

You think He is sacrificed over and over again.
 

Manfred

Well-known member
I would go to a quiet place and ask Christ that question.

Proverbs 3:5-6 Trust in the LORD with all your heart,

on your own intelligence do not rely;

In all your ways be mindful of him,

and he will make straight your paths.​
You think Jesus is sacrificed over and over and over.....

Why are you trusting in man and not the word of God?
10 And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

You change once for all to over, and over and over again
 

Arch Stanton

Well-known member
You think Jesus is sacrificed over and over and over.....
Mt 12:36 I tell you, on the day of judgment people will render an account for every careless word they speak.
Why are you trusting in man and not the word of God?
Eph 3:10 so that the manifold WISDOM of God might now be made known THROUGH the CHURCH to the principalities and authorities in the heavens.
You change once for all to over, and over and over again
Eph 4:14 so that we may no longer be infants, tossed by waves and swept along by every wind of teaching arising from human trickery, from their cunning in the interests of deceitful scheming.
 

Manfred

Well-known member
Mt 12:36 I tell you, on the day of judgment people will render an account for every careless word they speak.

Eph 3:10 so that the manifold WISDOM of God might now be made known THROUGH the CHURCH to the principalities and authorities in the heavens.

Eph 4:14 so that we may no longer be infants, tossed by waves and swept along by every wind of teaching arising from human trickery, from their cunning in the interests of deceitful scheming.
And?

Are these scriptures supposed to exonerate you?

How sad...
 

Manfred

Well-known member
go to your quiet place away from the deceiver and pray for wisdom and guidance
That is why I am staying far away from your false teachings
Why would I need to be exonerated? I am in Christ's One True Church!
No you are not
It is quite sad that you believe a bunch of men that were disgruntled with Christ's Catholic Church! THAT is sad!
Never said such a thing.
You still think the RCC is built on Peter right? It has nothing to do with Christ...
 
Top