The Climate Is So Bad..........

I was told you claimed to perform circumcisions

is this true?
Actually one of your LYING atheeist Komrades said I claimed to do 400 a month. Why do you people make stuff up?

Are you proud of how Mike Mann lost his lawsuit? And can't cough up court ordered legal fees?

Are you proud of how your Kultists discussed their tricks in Climategate?

Just as filthy as your Hunter Biden.
 
No conspiracy just the usual propaganda
You think the melting ice caps and glaciers is propaganda?
The climate has always done that throughout history, has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels
Since pre-industrial times, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have risen by 30%, alongside sharp increases in other greenhouse gases, in
particular methane and nitrous oxide. As noted in 2002 atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide levels were higher than they had been for at
least 420,000 years.

Would you like to explain that jump as a natural phenomenon?

Yes, but you’re misinterpreting the data.
In what way? How about some actual facts rather than your opinion?
Yeah yeah yeah, but none of your chicken little hysterical predictions have come true so far but they do sell books‼️‼️
They are starting to happen. Sea levels are rising, ice caps and glaciers are melting, the planet is heating up.

Again rather than personal opinion, how about some facts to counter that?
 
We get it

You think all of the world’s scientists are lying to us about climate change

scientists from every country and every political position

I think that’s absurd

the motivations of the climate deniers are obvious and their dishonesty is clear to anyone that fact-checks them
I think it is probably something along the lines of "In Tucker Carlson We Trust".:ROFLMAO:
 
Because you cannot answer. If the climate, as you nuts claim, is warmer than it should be then it seems reasonable to ask how warm should it be?
Well my dear "Cranky Uncle"

It is not about "how warm should it be" but how can human life, as billions of us currently enjoy, it be sustained?

We know that over the last hundred and twenty years there has been a massive retreat of mountain glaciers all over the world, while since the 1950s the Arctic ice has been thinning dramatically with the result that in the summer of 2000 the North Pole was ice free. It is now predicted that the Arctic ocean in summer will very likely be completely ice free before 2050.

Furthermore, the extent of Arctic sea ice in spring and summer is 10–15% smaller than it was 40 years ago, while ice on lakes and rivers at higher
altitudes in the northern hemisphere has now been recorded as melting in spring two weeks earlier than a century ago. In the early 2000s northern hemisphere spring snow cover was already 10% down on the 1966–86 mean and IPCC predictions at the time suggested that that polar and mountainous regions of the hemisphere could be 8 degrees Celsius warmer by 2100.

In 2004 the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was 380 parts per million [ppm] and as the oceans warm they absorb more
more carbon dioxide from the air and become more acidic. Dramatically increasing the rate of melting of snow and ice means rising sea levels: tide gauge data indicate that global sea levels rose by between 10 and 20 centimetres during the twentieth century, and this rise is expected to escalate drastically in the coming hundred years, with sea levels predicted to be 40 centimetres and perhaps over 80 centimetres higher by 2100.

This year the temperatures in Greenland have been at around 15 degrees C [60 F] which is ten degrees warmer than is normal for this time of year and melting is increasing. This impacts on sea levels. For example, a 1-metre rise in sea-level would see the Maldives under water, while a combination of rising sea level and sinking of the land surface have been forecast to result in a 1.8-metre rise in Bangladesh in another thirty years or so. That would lead to the loss of 16% of the land's surface which supports millions of people.

Further temperature rises will also impact on vegetation and animal life as well as humans. At present there are some 8 billion of us on earth [unlike in the distant human past] and all those people need to be fed and housed. Hence as areas of the world become uninhabitable for humans we are going to see mass migrations of people moving to areas that are still sustainable. There will also be the risk of diseases hitherto not found in certain regions arriving as natural vectors [insects etc] move into those regions as they warm.
 
Well my dear "Cranky Uncle"

It is not about "how warm should it be" but how can human life, as billions of us currently enjoy, it be sustained?

We know that over the last hundred and twenty years there has been a massive retreat of mountain glaciers all over the world, while since the 1950s the Arctic ice has been thinning dramatically with the result that in the summer of 2000 the North Pole was ice free. It is now predicted that the Arctic ocean in summer will very likely be completely ice free before 2050.

Furthermore, the extent of Arctic sea ice in spring and summer is 10–15% smaller than it was 40 years ago, while ice on lakes and rivers at higher
altitudes in the northern hemisphere has now been recorded as melting in spring two weeks earlier than a century ago. In the early 2000s northern hemisphere spring snow cover was already 10% down on the 1966–86 mean and IPCC predictions at the time suggested that that polar and mountainous regions of the hemisphere could be 8 degrees Celsius warmer by 2100.

In 2004 the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was 380 parts per million [ppm] and as the oceans warm they absorb more
more carbon dioxide from the air and become more acidic. Dramatically increasing the rate of melting of snow and ice means rising sea levels: tide gauge data indicate that global sea levels rose by between 10 and 20 centimetres during the twentieth century, and this rise is expected to escalate drastically in the coming hundred years, with sea levels predicted to be 40 centimetres and perhaps over 80 centimetres higher by 2100.

This year the temperatures in Greenland have been at around 15 degrees C [60 F] which is ten degrees warmer than is normal for this time of year and melting is increasing. This impacts on sea levels. For example, a 1-metre rise in sea-level would see the Maldives under water, while a combination of rising sea level and sinking of the land surface have been forecast to result in a 1.8-metre rise in Bangladesh in another thirty years or so. That would lead to the loss of 16% of the land's surface which supports millions of people.

Further temperature rises will also impact on vegetation and animal life as well as humans. At present there are some 8 billion of us on earth [unlike in the distant human past] and all those people need to be fed and housed. Hence as areas of the world become uninhabitable for humans we are going to see mass migrations of people moving to areas that are still sustainable. There will also be the risk of diseases hitherto not found in certain regions arriving as natural vectors [insects etc] move into those regions as they warm.
All this has happened before. The climate shifts. Who knew? The Ice Age? Mid- Evil warming period ring a bell?

So if the Earth us warmer than it should be, because of man, then how warm should it be? What is normal?
 
All this has happened before. The climate shifts. Who knew? The Ice Age? Mid- Evil warming period ring a bell?

So if the Earth us warmer than it should be, because of man, then how warm should it be? What is normal?
Firstly we were not pumping out the amount of carbon dioxide and other pollutants at earlier periods in human society as we are today and secondly the human population of the planet was a great deal smaller. Your comments are uninformed and somewhat ignorant.
 
Would you like to explain that jump as a natural phenomenon?
How many times in the 4 billion years lifetime of the earth do you think the climate has gotten hot, cold, and then unbearably hot again. It's probably happened thousands of times - and all without man being "the" main factor. As the great sage George Carlin once said: "The earth is not going anywhere, we are". This is all just a monetary distribution scheme and an attempt by some to wield as much power over others as they can.
 
Firstly we were not pumping out the amount of carbon dioxide and other pollutants at earlier periods in human society as we are today and secondly the human population of the planet was a great deal smaller. Your comments are uninformed and somewhat ignorant.
You are the one who is ignorant and can't see what is really going on here. All that is happening is a natural occurrence that always happens on this planet called earth. During the last 10 years or so, there has been a marked increase in solar activity and the magnetic poles of the earth are shifting. That's is what is causing "climate change", not man and his use of fossil fuels (which are also natural to the planet". Mellow out friend, God has it all in hand.
 
You think the melting ice caps and glaciers is propaganda?
There are no melting ice caps. Where’s your scientific proof for that? You should come up with actual information and proof of that other than your propaganda from your bigoted climate change hoaxer sites.
Since pre-industrial times, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have risen by 30%, alongside sharp increases in other greenhouse gases, in
particular methane and nitrous oxide. As noted in 2002 atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide levels were higher than they had been for at
least 420,000 years.
Not only have you been duped by climate change hoaxers but you’ve also been duped by evolution hoaxers. There’s no such thing as 420,000 years, that’s another unscientific and unproven evolutionary conjecture you blindly believe
Would you like to explain that jump as a natural phenomenon?
Yes, it’s just a natural occurrence observed and recorded in historical science
They are starting to happen. Sea levels are rising, ice caps and glaciers are melting, the planet is heating up.
Once again, you, (not really you but your leaders), find a scant bit of information from science and then you morph it, mix in large percentage of fictional computer modeling and there you have it— your make believe climate change facade
Again rather than personal opinion, how about some facts to counter that?
So far you’ve ignored the facts.

Either you don’t know the difference between a fact and an opinion or you’ve chosen to believe whatever you want to believe despite the facts. I would guess it’s a good bit of both
 
Firstly we were not pumping out the amount of carbon dioxide and other pollutants at earlier periods in human society as we are today and secondly the human population of the planet was a great deal smaller. Your comments are uninformed and somewhat ignorant.
My points are unaddressed..

We are? Yet the Earth has been warmer. How? With a much smaller population. Your correlation between population and carbon output does not seem to jive. Your simply parroting silly leftist talking points.
 
All this has happened before. The climate shifts. Who knew? The Ice Age? Mid- Evil warming period ring a bell?

So if the Earth us warmer than it should be, because of man, then how warm should it be? What is normal?
That "Mid-Evil" warming period was adjusted and Mannipulated to prepare the Hockey Stick.
 
There are no melting ice caps.
  • The Ward Hunt Ice Shelf, the largest single block of ice in the Arctic, started cracking in the year 2000. This shelf, which has been around for the last 3000 years, has split all the way and is now breaking into little pieces.
  • According to NASA, the polar ice caps are melting at an alarming rate of 9% per decade. The thickness of the Arctic Ice has decreased by 40% since the 1960s.
  • According to scientists at the U.S Center for Atmospheric Research, if the current rate of global temperature rise continues, the Arctic will be free of Ice by 2040.
  • The IPCC predicts that sea levels could rise by 10 to 23 inches by 2100
So far you’ve ignored the facts.
What facts? You have yet to present any.
 
You are the one who is ignorant and can't see what is really going on here. All that is happening is a natural occurrence that always happens on this planet called earth. During the last 10 years or so, there has been a marked increase in solar activity and the magnetic poles of the earth are shifting. That's is what is causing "climate change", not man and his use of fossil fuels (which are also natural to the planet". Mellow out friend, God has it all in hand.
The Sun follows a regular 11-year pattern of activity, known as the sunspot cycle, during which time its output varies by about 0.1 per cent. Solar
output also changes over longer periods, ranging from hundreds to tens of thousands of years, and these can play a significant role in cooling or warming the planet and – in recent centuries – in modifying or masking the effect of anthropogenically derived gases.
 
  • The Ward Hunt Ice Shelf, the largest single block of ice in the Arctic, started cracking in the year 2000. This shelf, which has been around for the last 3000 years, has split all the way and is now breaking into little pieces.
  • According to NASA, the polar ice caps are melting at an alarming rate of 9% per decade. The thickness of the Arctic Ice has decreased by 40% since the 1960s.
  • According to scientists at the U.S Center for Atmospheric Research, if the current rate of global temperature rise continues, the Arctic will be free of Ice by 2040.
  • The IPCC predicts that sea levels could rise by 10 to 23 inches by 2100

What facts? You have yet to present any.
You probably didn’t know it but NASA is not a reliable source for obtaining objective scientific information especially regarding climate change.

But hey, you didn’t know the difference.

When I asked for scientific information [except (to the exclusion of) climate change gullibles and propagandists], I should have been more careful to include NASA in there for you but at least now you know.

NASA is just another science fiction enterprise, (albeit not futuristic science fiction rather current fiction being peddled off in the place of real science), controlled by the usual suspects who have seized control of certain educational establishments

Ok, so here’s your second change. This time quote reliable sources of information
 
Your points are talking points we have heard ad noseum. The simply beg the question as my unanswered question point out.
ad noseum

I think you intended to write ad nauseum.

There is no way of knowing what is normal as you put it. It is a fallacious question. However, that does not surprise me coming from someone who is in denial.
 
You probably didn’t know it but NASA is not a reliable source for obtaining objective scientific information especially regarding climate change.

But hey, you didn’t know the difference.

When I asked for scientific information [except (to the exclusion of) climate change gullibles and propagandists], I should have been more careful to include NASA in there for you but at least now you know.

NASA is just another science fiction enterprise, (albeit not futuristic science fiction rather current fiction being peddled off in the place of real science), controlled by the usual suspects who have seized control of certain educational establishments

Ok, so here’s your second change. This time quote reliable sources of information
Here's your second chance - provide some attested scientific data that support your contentions.
 
"but most of them are", utter nonsense.
of the 150 glaciers in Glacier National Park in 1850, only 25 remain. Eleven of the park's named glaciers have melted away since 1966.

Between 1966 and 2015, all of the 25 glaciers in the park got smaller. Some lost as much as 80% of their area, with average loss of 40%.

How can you deny that this is a major loss of glacier number and size?

If you have alternative numbers, post them.

That the projected date of the complete loss of all glaciers was off is not the major failing you think it is as we are clearly on the path to that result.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top