“no errors of translation in the KJV”
Who are you talking to?
Nobody I know.
Are you suggesting that you accept the truth that there are errors of translation in the KJV?
Here are quotations quoted from Nick Sayers, someone whom you know, as reported at another forum concerning Bible versions. These quotations are found in the opening post of a thread entitled "Nick Sayers: KJOnlyist, or just misunderstood? which you have probably seen.
"God promised to preserve His words somewhere. I believe it is in the TR and Masoretic text underlying the KJV."
"the text underlying the KJV is what I would gravitate towards. Scrivener did a good job, but not perfect."
"the unprinted edition underlying the KJV is the most accurate form of the TR"
"The KJV is the most accurate rendition of the TR."
"The TR is akin to the original."
"I wrote an article to show the errors in the KJV, and proved myself wrong."
"I have yet to find any errors in the KJV."
"We believe that the King James Version is the most accurate representation of the Textus Receptus and is
without translational error."
[bold type in last statement added by this poster]
These statements indicate that Nick Sayers can soundly be considered to be a KJV-only advocate.